Paul Krugman Profile picture
Aug 24 5 tweets 1 min read
There are arguments against Biden's student loan forgiveness plan — is this the best use of ~$200 billion? Is it fair to those without such debt? Also arguments for, which I'll have more to say about. But all the talk about inflation is fairly baffling, for two reasons 1/
First, the US is a very big economy. Any impact of this forgiveness on spending will be small relative to GDP. If you want to compare with the Rescue Plan, this is roughly 1/10 the size, with effects likely to be spread over multiple years. Just not big in macro terms 2/
Second, to the extent that deficit spending was inflationary in 2021, it was because the Fed was accommodative — complacent about inflation (yes, like me) and unwilling to raise rates. These days, any expansionary impact, if there is one, will be offset by monetary tightening 3/
The argument "but it will be inflationary" seems so obviously wrong, so inconsistent with the math, that, as I said, it's baffling. Maybe people who oppose this move on other grounds are just going for the cheap shot? 4/
Again, I can see reasons to oppose this move, although you want to compare it not with what we should do ideally but with *what Biden can actually do*. But spare us the inflation scare talk 5/

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Paul Krugman

Paul Krugman Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @paulkrugman

Aug 26
In a different universe, Rs would respond to Biden's debt relief by saying "This is poorly targeted and doesn't address the deeper issues. Here's our better plan." But the GOP no longer does policy — and their actual response was awesomely tone-deaf 1/
First of all, these are the last people who should be insisting on the sacred obligation to repay your debts, no matter what. It's harder to find prominent MAGA Republicans who aren't grifters and/or deadbeats than ones who are. The opportunities for mockery are endless 2/
Second, around 40 million Americans will be getting debt relief — and they have families, too. Suggesting that they're all doing something immoral is ... not smart, politically. As a group, they probably lean Democratic, but not uniformly — and turnout matters too 3/
Read 4 tweets
Aug 25
Such a strange debate over debt relief and inflation, especially the unhelpful discussion about baselines. Here's what we know: the end of the payments moratorium will be modestly contractionary; debt relief will offset some but not all of that contraction 1/
If we ignore the role of the Fed, this means that output and inflation will be a bit higher than they would if the contractionary stuff wasn't offset. This doesn't mean inflation higher than it is now, and the difference will at most be a fraction of a percentage point 2/
Add in that the Fed is in the process of doing whatever it takes to bring inflation down. Do we seriously think that debt relief will frustrate the Fed's efforts? 3/
Read 4 tweets
Aug 17
Not sure we even have a disagreement. The likelihood of positive externalities from alternative energy makes a subsidy-based approach to climate better than your usual second-best policy — but there is definitely a case for broad disincentives to emit greenhouse gases 1/
On the other hand, given those externalities, a carbon tax alone wouldn't be first-best either. If there were no political constraints, we'd probably want a mix of emissions taxes and industrial policy. But you can't ignore those constraints; getting the IRA is a miracle 2/
I'd add that among the political constraints is the reality that if you do clever things to compensate voters who lose from taxes ... they won't notice. E.g., schemes to neutralize the impact of carbon taxes with lump-sum transfers were just naive about how much voters know 3/
Read 4 tweets
Aug 14
Some further notes on the changing politics of environment. Not only did the 1990 bill pass with bipartisan support, one of the Yea votes was a first-term senator from Kentucky named Mitch McConnell 1/
In the 1990s, the parties weren't that far apart on environmental policy — nothing like the chasm that mainly emerged during the Obama years 2/
Here, from Pew, is opinion on whether we should do what it takes to protect the environment: 3/
Read 6 tweets
Aug 9
Personally, I'm annoyed by the searching of Mar a Lago — not the fact that it happened, but the timing. I was hoping that we could spend at least a few days talking about Dem's incredible climate policy triumph, which has now been crowded off the front pages 1/
Obviously, though, the FBI had reason to believe that there was an urgent need to act. No idea what if anything they found, but does anyone really doubt that Trump engaged in massive lawbreaking? As everyone says, no way the FBI would have done this lightly 2/
What's interesting is the reaction of Republican legislators. They know perfectly well that Trump engaged in sedition, but they don't care. However, they're probably also aware that Trump himself is a political liability 3/
Read 5 tweets
Aug 7
To anyone about to write this up primarily as a horserace story — some already have — stop. Yes, the midterms matter, hugely; but first and foremost this was a victory for urgently needed policy 1/
Dems came into power with a three-part agenda: climate, infrastructure, and social programs. They just delivered on the first, which was the most crucial — and no, it wasn't far less than they sought. It accomplished most of the original objective 2/
On infrastructure, Obama wanted to invest but couldn't; Trump promised to invest but didn't; Biden actually got it done 3/
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(