1: TDR theories, principles and methods have been largely governed by researchers from the global North. To enable more context-sensitive TDR framing, we investigated contextual conditions impacting TDR in 6 case studies in Asia, Latin America and Africa.
2: Our results revealed several challenges that should be considered when conducting TDR in these contexts—though many may also be relevant in global North contexts:
3: Common challenges related to unstable social, political, and environmental conditions, as well as science systems themselves.
We conclude that TDR must (a-d):
4:
a) become more adaptive, flexible, and resilient in its design;
b) acknowledge local ways of communicating, researching, and learning in its methods;
5:
c) be embedded in long-term partnerships that facilitate trust building and familiarization with local cultures and socio-political dynamics;
(d) involve explicit theories of change that reflect local
conditions.
6: However, avoiding the reproduction of power relations while considering different research cultures is a tightrope act. When core principles of TDR, like open deliberation, are at risk, researchers need to reflect their own roles and epistemological values.