The Starry Night is a great lesson on how technology changes art.
Vincent Van Gogh created his masterpiece in 1889. But the painting style was born from the art world's response to the invention of photography decades earlier.
Here the story🧵
Van Gogh was born in 1853 in Zundert, Netherlands.
He had an interest in art from a young age, including a short stint as an art dealer. But through his teens and 20s, poor mental health prevented Van Gogh from keeping a profession.
In 1881, he moved back in with his parents.
With financial and emotional support from his younger brother Theo, Van Gogh began to paint more seriously.
The two brothers corresponded frequently by letters, which has given future generations full access into Van Gogh's psyche.
Van Gogh's early works were character and setting studies.
Compared to his more famous pieces, there was a lack of color.
This style was very much in line with the post-Enlightenment norm of capturing scenes as a form of documentation (eg. look quite realistic).
Now, let's rewind back to 1839.
That year saw the development of the first photographic camera for commercial use -- the Daguerre camera.
While it required 30 minutes of light exposure, that was much shorter than the hours required of photography devices in previous decades.
Camera technology advanced and the ability to capture real-life images no longer required an artist. Up to this point, the norm to have a portrait "done" was commission a painter.
By 1849, 100k Parisians had a portrait taken by camera.
Artists were freed to try new techniques.
The most notable art movement was Impressionism, which began in 1860 (France).
Artists like Claude Monet tried techniques that were different than what a camera could capture (playing w/ light, color, brushstrokes)
The paintings were a subjective view of reality (often nature).
Back to Van Gogh: he followed his brother Theo to Paris in 1886 (then Arle, France in 1888).
In France, Van Gogh was exposed to Monet (and other Impressionists).
The budding artist transitioned from the dark Dutch painting style to a brighter palette and more subjective view.
The "ear cutting" incident took place in Arle on December 23rd, 1888.
Van Gogh mutilated himself after a mental breakdown. He spent months in hospital before admitting himself to a psychiatric institution in Saint-Remy France in May 1889.
What followed was a creative explosion.
Saint-Remy was quite a progressive asylum. The institution believed it was crucial to surround patients with nature.
Van Gogh spent the next year on a strict schedule and made 150 paintings.
This was the view from Van Gogh's room, which inspired a number of landscape paintings.
The view also inspired The Starry Night, which Van Gogh painted on the night of June 23rd, 1889.
Van Gogh made the painting in a studio room (different than his bedroom view).
It was actually done during the daytime and meant he did it from memory (as subjective as it gets).
It wasn't the first time Van Gogh had painted a starry night sky:
◻️Cafe Terrace at Night (Sept 1888)
◻️Starry Night Over The Rhone (Sept 1888)
But the night sky in these paintings are much more "realistic" than the one he painted at Saint Remy…
Van Gogh — who is considered a post-impressionist —believed The Starry Night to be a failure.
In a letter to French painter Emile Bernard, Van Gogh said the work was too abstract and unrealistic.
Turns out Van Gogh's subjective approach became his most enduring work.
Within 14 months, Van Gogh was dead from a self-inflicted gunshot wound. He was 37 and had only sold one painting in his life.
Today, The Starry Night is displayed at The MOMA in New York. It's the 3rd most visited painting in the world (after Mona Lisa and The Sistine Chapel).
Why does Van Gogh's masterpieces resonates? Astrophysicist Neil deGrasse Tyson has my favorite explanation:
If you enjoyed that, I write interesting threads 1-2x a week.
A Neil Degrasse Tyson presentation that inspired this thread:
There’s a great scene in Doctor Who where they bring Van Gogh to Paris in 2010 to a museum and let him see how much his work has changed the world
The Starry Night was also influenced by the famous Great Wave by Japanese artist Hokusai (who Van Gogh admired)
Here’s the clip of @neiltyson explaining why The Starry Night is his favorite painting: “It’s not what Van Gogh saw that night. It’s what he felt.”
Here’s a fascinating TED ED video explaining how the swirls in The Starry Night seem to show that Van Gogh understood one of the most complex phenomenons in physics: fluid dynamics (which remains a semi-mystery)
🔗
There are some great Starry Night parody paintings
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
This timelapse of Alex Honnold’s 1 hour 35 minute free solo climb of Taipei 101 is unreal.
He said the main challenge was “not getting complacent up the bamboo boxes, because it’s 64 of the same sequence over and over.”
His music playlist (mostly Tool) helped because each bamboo box took about the length of a song and he could keep pace.
Honnold wants to climb other mega skyscrapers if allowed.
Thinks Taipei 101 was the ideal challenge, though: “This one is so perfect for climbing. There are some buildings that are almost too easy for climbing. Like, ones that have a window washing track on the outside, where you’re just hand over handing on some track the whole way. You can climb it, but it’s not a challenge. The thing about Taipei 101 is it’s perfectly in the sweet spot for me, where it’s possible, and it’s not too insanely hard.”
“The dragons, they’re also probably the scariest thing to actually do. I mean, they’re really fun, they’re really cool. It’s an incredible sequence, cool position. But every time I set up on the dragon, I’d be like, “this is kind of crazy.” You’re like, out over the abyss. It’s cool.”
Matt Damon and Ben Affleck on Rogan taking about how Netflix has changed filmmaking.
A major considerations is dealing with distracted viewers. To keep them tuned in, “you re-iterate the plot 3-4x in the dialogue because people are on their phones.”
Then, in action films, you change the ordering of climatic fights.
In traditional action films, you’d have “three set pieces” in every act (I, II, III) and each would “ramp up” (spend the big money on third set piece).
But streaming has to hook viewers within 5 minute, so the incentive is to put a major battle or action sequence much earlier.
Also, the directors have less incentive to make a film look great because so many people watch on laptops and phones.
They do say that streaming allows for more bets on risky projects since the theatre economics are geared towards IP, sequels and super-heroes.
Example: an independent film with a $25m budget would spend $25m on marketing (1:1 ratio). But since it splits box office with the theatre, the film needs to make $100m (1/2 of which is $50m) just to break even.
They’re realistic about the state of film and call it a supply-demand issue. If the demand is for at-home viewing (eg. Netflix 300m+ subs), then filmmaking approach will change to feed the algo.
When there’s demand for theatre, Damon will go team up with Christopher Nolan to make “The Odyssey”.
A similar dynamic is happening to streaming TV shows. The incentives for story arc, dialogue and character types warped thr medium.
The Economist has a great piece on strategy sportsbetting apps use to throttle smart bettors:
▫️Skilled players are “sharps” and given “stake restrictions” if they play too well (bets are capped).
▫️Rest of players called “Square”.
▫️In 2025, 4.3% of active UK accounts had a “stake factor” below the maximum bet allowance of 100%.
▫️Sportsbook will take bets with a profit margin as low as 4.5%.
▫️If they are able to do good “player-profiling” and keep the “sharps” from playing, the profit margin can reach 10-20%.
▫️As important as keeping out “sharps” is hooking “whales”, the deep-pocketed players that are willing to keep playing (and losing) large sums.
▫️Some “whales” are actually “sharps” in disguise, though. They’ll lose a bunch of bets to lull the sportsbook then put down a massive bet when they have an edge.
▫️While there is a risk of a “whale” being a “sharp”, the value of a real “whale” is so high that sportsbook will take the risk
▫️“In March 2024 PointsBet, raised its share of online sports-gambling revenue in New Jersey from 11% to 24% after wooing a single cash-spouting customer away from DraftKings.” (I can confirm that this wasn’t me).
▫️How sportsbook profile players:
> Playing on Mobile is a good sign (where majority of people play)
> Playing on PCs is a bad sign (it’s easier to compare odds and run models)
> E-wallets are a red flag (sportsbooks prefer debit direct deposit that can attach a player to a single account; e-wallet is more anonymized and players can move cash between sportsbook more quickly to shop for the best odds)
> Women bettors are a red flag (most bettors are men and “sharps” often use women to place bets)
▫️First wagers are a major tells (typical bettors go after top leagues — NFL, NBA, EPL — and do so near the start of the game).
▫️Popular bets for “squares”: who will win, scoring margins and how star player will perform (also, they love multi-leg parlays).
▫️“Sharps” go after less popular leagues and place bets as soon as odds are published, when they are most mispriced. They also go after less popular bets such as “pts in Q3” or stats from a random player (“Sharps” rarely do parlays and don’t withdrawal winnings often).
▫️One gambling consultant tells The Economist that “By the time a customer places his first bet, [sportsbooks] are 80-90% certain they know the lifetime value of the account.”
▫️”Sportsbooks look at a player’s ‘closing-line value’ — a measure that compares the odds at which he bets with those available right before a match begins. If it is consistently ahead of the market over his first ten wagers, he is highly likely to beat the book in the long run.”
▫️Sportsbook mathematically monitor players and creates a new risk score every 6-8 hours (risk score = estimate of probability that customers will wind up unprofitable).
▫️E-wallet users, women and bets over $100 are flagged. These suspicious bettors are given 30% of maximum bet (and proven sharps only allowed 1%).
▫️High-skilled players will often get a “beard” to bet on their behalf. Most sportsbooks ban this practice but it is widespread.
▫️Safest “beards” are close friends and relatives because you can mostly rely on them to pay out any winnings. The “beards” try to look like degens (playing at 3am, bet non-stop and doing ridiculous parlays) before placing a winning bet.
▫️The most effective strategy for “sharps” is “whale-flipping”. Find a losing gambler, then ask to put a (likely) large winning bet amongst their pool of guaranteed losers.
▫️Once “sharps” max out the people they can use as “beards”, they tap professional networks called “movers”. These “movers” employ a bunch of “mules” who can put down bets on the behalf of the network. Low-end movers charge 10-20% while high-end movers charge 50% of winnings.
On a related note, I wrote on how slot machines make $10B+ a year in Las Vegas (~70% of all casino gaming revenue).
The history, psychology and design of the device…which went from a throwaway game to the industry’s “cash cow” and “gambling’s crack cocaine.”readtrung.com/p/the-ludicrou…
Satya Nadella on why Microsoft Excel has been so durable after 40 years:
> the power of lists and tables
> the malleability of the software (“a blinking canvas”)
> spreadsheet software is Turing complete (“I can make it do everything”)
> it’s the world’s most approachable programming environment (“you get into it without even thinking your programming”)
The invention of bánh mì is a combination of climate, trade and urban layout of Saigon in late-19th century designed by French colonist.
When the French captured the area in 1859, most economic activity in the region took place along the Saigon river.
The population built makeshift homes tightly bundled by the river banks. Outgrowth from this eventually lead to narrow alleyways between many buildings that is trademark of the city (the Khmer named the region Prey Nokor then French renamed it Saigon and then it was renamed to Ho Chi Minh City in 1976 after end of Vietnam War).
Over decades, the French created European street grids and built wide Paris-type boulevards in the city to funnel commerce to larger markets (also make the city easier to administer).
It was at these markets that French baguettes were introduced and traded.
Bánh mì bread is known for being flaky and crispy on the outside while fluffier on inside (so god damn good).
Two features of Saigon helped create this texture:
▫️Climate: The heat and humidity in Southeast Asia leads dough to ferment faster, which creates air pockets in bread (light and fluffy).
▫️Ingredient: Wide availability of rice meant locals added rice flour to wheat flour imports (which were quite expensive). Rice flour is more resistant to moisture and creates a drier, crispier crust.
Fast forward to the 1930s: the French-designed street layout is largely complete. Now, the city centre has wide boulevards intersected by countless narrow alleyways.
The design was ideal for street vendor carts. These businesses were inspired by shophosue of colonial architecture to sell all types of goods as chaotic traffic rushed by.
Vietnam has some of the most slapping rice and soup dishes, but many people on the move in the mornings wanted something more portable and edible by hand.
Bánh mì was traditionally upper class fare but it met the need for on-the-go food.
Just fill the bread with some Vietnamese ingredients (braised pork, pickled vegetable, Vietnamese coriander, chilies) along with French goodies (pate).
Pair it with cà phê sữa đá (aka coffee with condensed milk aka caffeinated crack) and you’re laughing.
Haven’t lived in Saigon for 10+ years but ate a banh mi every other day when I did.
While there, I also sold a comedy script to Fox (pitch: “The Fugitive meets Harold & Kumar set in Southeast Asia”).