2/ Arbitrum Nova is a new chain built w/ AnyTrust tech for low txs fees and a high level of security. Nova differs from @arbitrum One by not posting all tx data on chain, but to a Data Availability Committee.
3/ AnyTrust is a tech developed by @OffchainLabs (who built Arbitrum).
Nova security level sits between a sidechain and an optimistic rollup: with a set committee that operates the chain, the req is only for a small minority (2/20, for ex) to be honest. A sidechain would req 51%+
4/ Rather than posting all data to the @ethereum network, the committee certifies and validates batches of transactions and only posts the certifications to #Ethereum, resulting in significant cost savings for users.
5/ There’s no need to record all L2 tx data on the L1 chain, because nodes can rely on the committee to provide data if needed. Instead, it’s safe to simply record the hash of a tx batch on the L1, with huge savings vs how rollups work
6/ Still, withdrawals to L1 can be executed immediately, as soon as the committee vouches for them
As a security measure, If there is any issue with the committee, the chain fallbacks to a rollup-like architecture
7/ "Data will be posted on the L1 Ethereum chain, and withdrawals will have a delay period, just like on a standard rollup–until the committee resumes operation"
9/ The chain is built specifically for web3 games and social projects, and any dapp that requires high frequency and is ok with off chain data storage.
Chain/L2 specialization is something we are going to see more and more in the future
10/ Another perfect ecosystem for Session Keys, a primitive that allows users to pre-approve a specific type of txs and then dApps to execute them whenever needed (ex: an onchain game where users don't having to re-approve every move). A much better UX!
13/ With Nova now being connected on Connext, it means builders can easily create xApps, deploy them on Arbitrum Nova, and interact with any chain in a secure and flexible way, accessing liquidity and data on Arbitrum or any other L2.
1/ Earlier this year, we announced the Amarok network upgrade to overcome limitations in Connext v1. It introduces support for arbitrary message passing, enabling developers to integrate easily into our network to build fully expressive xchain (cross-chain) applications (xApps).
2/ The upgrade modularizes the bridging stack. Instead of 1 system powering all of the functionalities, developers instead call into a single function (xcall) that splits actions between a Liquidity Layer (Connext) & a Messaging Layer. blog.connext.network/announcing-the…
3/ After intensive research into the tradeoffs of bridge security models, we chose to partner closely with Nomad, the team that invented the Optimistic Bridge model - a messaging system that relays data across chains using fraud proofs similar to optimistic rollups.
1/ At approximately 9:32 pm UTC yesterday, an attacker began exploiting a bug in Nomad’s Ethereum smart contract, resulting in the theft of approximately $190M. Here’s what we know so far and what you can expect from us in the coming days:
2/ The vulnerability was caused by a bug introduced during a routine upgrade of the Nomad contracts. The bug unintentionally removed the requirement that a message be proven, allowing attackers to bypass proving the validity of messages to the contract’s process() function.
3/ The bug existed on all replicas across the 6 chains Nomad is deployed on but was outside the scope of Nomad’s fraud-proof mechanism. As such, it was unrelated to the Optimistic Bridge security model and unable to be stopped by Nomad’s watchers.
Given recent market conditions and volatility, we have decided to delay our token distribution temporarily. Below you’ll find the reasons behind this decision and the next steps we are putting in place to transition Connext into a DAO.
1/ In late April, we announced plans to launch $NEXT, a network utility and governance token, in addition to our intent to transition to a DAO — decentralizing the majority of our operations.
2/ Since that time, market conditions have shifted dramatically, bringing heightened volatility and an exodus of many smaller holders throughout the space. Historically, launching a token in this type of market has had a centralizing effect on ownership,
1/ Our latest governance proposal to distribute 300k $OP to Connext Liquidity Providers raised some fair questions as we never thoroughly explained this concept before for Amarok.
Here is how Liquidity Provision will work in the next version of Connext
2/ For the current version of Connext, all liquidity providers are “active”, meaning they have to set up a router in order to provide liquidity and support the functioning of the network. These LPs currently earn 5bps on each transaction.
3/ The system is kept trustless thanks to a peer-to-peer atomic swap process. 1 Router locks its tokens on one chain, user on the other, and only after that they exchange tokens with each other.