The #ESCCongress session started with @FudimMarat discussing how it worked – explaining how pts with HF have poor baroreflex sensitivity, that baroreflex down-regulation is related to worse HF symptoms & barostim provided chronic improvement in muscle sym nerve activity
2/n
Next William Abraham talked about what has been learnt from clinical trials, focusing on BeAT-HF which was an RCT that showed BAT significantly improved exercise capacity, QoL, NYHA class and NTproBNP, and was safe
The final speaker was @JBauersachsMD who described real world experience – how it is implanted and followed up and its CE mark indication (pts who are NYHA III and EF </= 35% despite treatment with appropriate HF guideline directed therapy
So where does this leave BAT? Well, it is CE marked & FDA approved, but has not yet shown a mortality benefit & the ESC HF guidelines state that evidence is currently insufficient to support a specific recommendation for a ⬇️ in mortality or hospitalization
And what about price?
A 2018 analysis listed the system price at 21000euros, but claimed this could still be cost effective/QALY.
An American study suggests it is less costly than OMT alone btn yrs 2&3
It will be interesting to see whether BAT moves into the mainstream in the coming years, and even if no mortality benefit is seen, a significant QoL benefit should not be underestimated. 7/7
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
2) Revascularization with PCI does not improve event-free survival in pts with severe LVSD over OMT alone
(HF cohort, not acute ACS pts or significant angina)
3) In pts with rheumatic heart disease and AF, RCT evidence supports VKA use over rivaroxaban, with decreased composite of CV events and death with VKA and no increase in bleeding.
Indications for referral for surgery for severe asymptomatic AS:
❤️Some match ESC guidelines (Vmax >5m/s, LVEF <55%, symptoms on exercise testing)
❤️lower cut off for raised BNP (2x ULN compared to ESC’s 3x ULN)
❤️include valve area <0.6cm2 (not mentioned by ESC)
2/n
The NICE guidelines for referral for surgery for severe asymptomatic AS do NOT include a couple of criteria mentioned by the ESC guidelines:
▪️ progression ≥ 0.3m/s/yr not included
▪️ Sustained fall in BP >20mmHg on exercise testing not included
3/n
1)The indications for surgery in severe asym AR have changed
- LVEDD has disappeared from the summary table& diagram
- but LVEDD>65mm is mentioned in the text as a possible indicator for surgery (less than previous >70mm) if there is progressive LV size⬆️/⬇️EF
Incidental finding of dilated aortic root/ thoracic aortic aneurysm – what should you do?
Fully-referenced thread covering when to intervene, how to follow up and what else to think about
1/n
To start with the basics: the size of the aortic root varies based on sex, height, weight and age, so these details are required to put a basic figure into context.
The commonly used nomogram to work out if an aortic root is dilated based on body surface area and age is based on the work of Roman et al, and is quoted in the ASE/EACVI 2015 guidelines