“If you agree with Savarkar, you will have political power, and he has a strong position in the Indian independence movement.”

— Rash Behari Bose in 1939 issues of Japanese Magazine Dai AjiaShugi

He also says: ‘Savarkar "is heroism, valor, adventure,and epitome of patriotism".
Well with people like Rash Behari Bose praising Savarkar as most important personality in Indian Independence Movement in 1939, such tall leader doesn’t needs certificate from non nuanced people like @t_d_h_nair

Here is image of Japanese Article
You can read the whole article written by Rash Behari Bose here savarkarsmarak.com/rashbiharibose…

Of course people like @t_d_h_nair have no clarity that independence case because of INA at large along with other mutinies.

Does Mr Nair who founded first INA?
It was Rash Behari Bose who had founded based on militarisation policy always shown as way to independence by Savarkar.

This letter by Savarkar’s secretary to KC Das shows link between Netaji, Rash Behari & Savarkar leading to Azad Hind Fauj.
I know it will be too much to ask from @t_d_h_nair to read , but @vikramsampath in his second volume on Savarkar had very well established that Savarkar indirectly led to independence through the military mutiny which he always saw as path right from writing book on 1857.
Savarkar was so keen to act upon world wars for seeing it as best opportunity to hit the British.

@t_d_h_nair to prove your silly tweet you will need to refute 5 lakh words of @vikramsampath

For me, Savarkar was the pioneer man who led our success in getting independence.
The dolt @t_d_h_nair calls the article of Rash B Bose as Sanghi photoshop despite giving magazine snippet and date.

Liability lies on him to prove that March,April, 1939 issue of DAI AJIA SHUGI, from ASIATIC SOCIETY TOKYO PUBLICATION didn’t publish it.
Someone should tell @t_d_h_nair that the letter mentioned here showing the link between INA, Netaji, Savarkar & Rash Behari Bose can be read in a book “The Two Great Indians In Japan” by Japanese Ohshawa published in 1954

Link: archive.org/details/in.ern…
And @t_d_h_nair as far as WA university photoshop is concerned consult @Ashok_Kashmir who has yet to show primary source name to @anujdhar & @chandrachurg for an image put in his book showing Savarkar targeting Netaji through bow & arrow.

Bada aaya challenge wala...

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Aabhas Maldahiyar 🇮🇳

Aabhas Maldahiyar 🇮🇳 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Aabhas24

Aug 31
Elephant-faced God found in a plate excavated in Luristan dated to 1200-1000 BC.

Image Source: @Bharathgyan

Description Snippet: The problem of Ganapati
by H. Heras ImageImage
Ganạpati figure at Kanṭ̣aka Cetiya, Srilanka dated 2nd Century AD.

Source: academia.edu/36049182/Gan_a… ImageImage
Read more about this Ganpati in Buddhist Kanṭ̣aka Cetiya in this paper by M.K. Dhvalikar that shows how Hindu Ishvara Ganesha was very much part of Buddhist tradition.

Link to journal where this paper was published noolaham.net/project/46/455… Image
Read 4 tweets
Aug 30
1/n The founder of INA, Rash Behari Bose had found "a real leader of men," increasing his "revolutionary zeal," while meeting with Jatindranath Mukherjee(Bagha Jatin).

Snippet of text:book by Uma Mukherjee(1966) Jatindranath Mukherjee in 1909Two Great Indian Revolution...
2/n Arun Chandra Guha, a MP of Congress (1952-67) in his book, "First Spark of Revolution" described Jatin's acts after Alipore Case as "daring actions in Calcutta and in the districts, to revive the confidence of the people in the movement (...)"

Refer page 163, 1971 edition Image
3/n According to the Sedition Committee Report 1918, Jatin had introduced in "bank robbery on automobile taxi-cabs," a new feature in revolutionary crime (as they called it).

He was a real threat to Brits.

Read the whole report here archive.org/details/sediti… Image
Read 4 tweets
Aug 27
The religious symbolism of different colours were pioneered by Mahatma Gandhi in 1921 session of congress.

He commissioned P Venkayya to design a flag with the spinning wheel on a red & green banner. The red was to signify Hindus and the green for Muslims.
But something is interesting here. Although Gandhi ji wanted the proposed flag to be presented at the Congress session of 1921, but it wasn’t complete on time.

Hence instantly another flag was proposed at the session with similar idea of religions with upgradation. Gandhi's Flag, introduced at the Congress meeting in 1921.
Gandhi points out later for the delay to be fortuitous since it allowed him to add colour for other religions. Along with red & green, white was added to represent all the other religions.

@ashajadeja325 ji I referred this paper as source:
Read 4 tweets
Aug 24
1/n Thread

While historians like Yusuf Ansari keep normalising Muslim Invasions Primary sources keep reminding us of atrocities.

Let’s check a few.

Qazi Mughisuddin's reply to Sultan Alauddin Khalji when he asks how to treat Hindus? Image
2/n Alauddin: "How are Hindus designated in the law, as payers of tributes or givers of tribute?

Qazi Mughisuddin: “They are called payers of tribute, & when the revenue officer demands silver from them, they should tender gold. Image
3/n If the officer throws dirt into their mouths, they must without reluctance open their mouths to receive it. By doing so they show their respect for the officer. The due subordination of the zimmi is exhibited in this humble payment & by this throwing of dirt in their mouths.
Read 21 tweets
Aug 24
The historian Yusuf Ansari is losing all that should make him historian & more a troll.

@feludamitter said it for “those who accuse Pushyamitra” not that it makes accusations true.

Even Prof Thapar disagrees on accusations against Pushyamitra.
There is a reason @yusufpore that why no one could take up challenge of SR Goel put decades back to prove Hindus destroyed Buddhist Places.

I give this challenge to you again. Prove it using “Contemporary Primary Source”.

There is a reason why Prof Thapar too disagrees.
And as a matter of caution I must show you that how foolish it is to claim that Pushyamitra destroyed Buddhist places. This is the thread. As start Historian Yusuf should begin by refuting it as part-1 of challenge given by SR Goel.
Read 4 tweets
Aug 22
Haha! I dared you to refute works of @NirajRai3 . Can you or not?

Forget @tjoseph0010 rebutting the scientist Niraj, has he even been able to rebut Talegeri Ji’s work?

Stop using other shoulders that too one which is already shaggy.
Again you missed it completely.
I had said that you may bring Murirkula, & then I’ll will show you how you have misinterpreted it.

Bring your pointer & then I’ll show you where your “analysis” stands.
No one is denying the massacres by Sakas, show me where they imposed their faith system or killed in name religion as the likes of Ghazni, Ghori etc?

Their sole purpose was to islamise. I showed you what Utbi says. There are more & more.
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(