Share this page!

LawBeat Profile picture
Twitter logo
Aug 30 • 12 tweets • 5 min read
BREAKING: Karnataka High Court is hearing Anjuman Islam Trust against a Karnataka High Court order against Ganesh Chaturthi celebrations in Hubbali Idgah Maidan #GaneshChaturthi2022
The Anjuman Islam Trust refers to Supreme Court order of passed in the evening which had halted Ganesh Chaturthi festivities at another Idgah Maidan of Bengaluru. Trust says same relief be given here #GaneshChaturthi2022
AAG says that the Corporation has the right to use the property as it pleases. Bench asks if this is true.
AAG says there is no dispute to the Title of the Maidan. “#Ganeshotsav2022 is not strictly religious, after all everyone is welcome,” he says
BREAKING: Karnataka HC to dictate order on whether Ganesh Chaturthi festivities can be held at Idgah Ground (Huballi-Dharwad) at 10.45 PM. Anjuman Islamic Trust says #SupremeCourt passed order refusing permission at Bengaluru’s Idgah Maidan, same applies here #GaneshChaturthi2022
🚨Bench assembles, Karnataka High Court is now dictating order. #Ganeshotsav
Karnataka High Court: Not in dispute that property (Idgah ground at Hubbali-Dharwad) belongs to respondents #karnatakahighcourt #GaneshFestival
Karnataka HC: Anjuman Islamic Trust has admitted that Hubbali-Dharwad Idgah ground belongs to respondents #GaneshFestival #karnatakahighcourt
BREAKING: Karnataka High Court says Muslim trust is licensee of property (Idgah Ground at Hubbali-Dharwad) and not exclusive owner #GaneshaChaturthi #IdgahMaidan
BREAKING: Petitioner has civil remedy if respondents go in abrogation of Places of Worship Act. Their position no ground to grant status quo on Idgah Ground at Hubbali-Dharwad #GaneshChaturthi2022 #karnatahighcourt
🚨Petitioner not entitled to avail benefit of Supreme Court order passed on Idgah Maidan status quo today: Karnataka High Court #GaneshChaturthi2022 #idgah
BREAKING: Karnataka High Court REJECTS plea by Muslim trust to disallow Ganesha Chaturthi festivities at Idgah Ground located at Hubbali-Dharwad in Bengaluru, Trust NOT entitled to benefit of Supreme Court order passed earlier
(Photo: The Hindu)
*Hubbali-Dharwad, not Bengaluru

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
　

Keep Current with LawBeat

LawBeat Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @LawBeatInd

LawBeat Profile picture
Sep 1
BREAKING: @RBI has informed the #DelhiHighCourt that a regulatory framework to
support orderly growth of credit delivery through #DigitalLending methods while mitigating the regulatory concerns, has
been firmed up.
The affidavit has been filed in a plea seeking regulation of Online Lending platforms charging exorbitant rates of interest from small borrowers.
#OnlineLending
@pbhushan1
"The said regulatory framework is expected to address the concerns relating to unbridled
engagement of third parties, mis-selling, breach of #DataPrivacy, customer grievance redressal, unfair business conduct, and unethical recovery practices," RBI adds.
Read 5 tweets
LawBeat Profile picture
Sep 1
#DelhiHighCourt hearing a plea filed by Manjit Singh Chauhan appearing in person over the issue of repairing 'pathetic' road in the Kotla Mubarakpur area.
Chauhan submitted that the authorities since 20 years have not done anything.
The officers are sitting in their offices, I have to come to the court and waste the time of the court since last 4 months.
The bench has asked to inform them about who is the boss of CPWD and thereafter they'll follow the issue.
Read 4 tweets
LawBeat Profile picture
Sep 1
#DelhiHighCourt to hear a plea seeking regulation of Online Lending platforms charging exorbitant rates of interest from small borrowers.
#OnlineLending
@pbhushan1
Advocate Prashant Bhushan submitted that after the Court issued notice, the Government issued a circular for the lending platforms in general and later the a expert committee had submitted its report and since then they are taking time.
There are several platforms which are not registered as an NBFC, the authorities are in power to take appropriate action, Bhushan added.
Read 5 tweets
LawBeat Profile picture
Sep 1
📍Bench Led by Justice DY Chandrachud will hear plea today by Archbishop of Bangalore Diocese Most Rev Peter Machado alleging that there is "targeted attack on Christians". It seeks registration of FIRs and conduct an investigation into the same by an SIT #SupremeCourt
In their reply to the PIL, Centre had recently informed the #SupremeCourt that on a preliminary ascertainment of the assertions, it found that the petitioner resorted to falsehood and self-serving documents.
Read more here:
lawbeat.in/amp/top-storie…
A bench of Justices DY Chandrachud and Hima Kohli begins hearing the matter.
Read 5 tweets
LawBeat Profile picture
Sep 1
#DelhiHighCourt hearing a plea filed by TV Today Network Limited against a Single Judge's order dismissing a plea filed by TV Today against the I&B Ministry's warning over content telecasted on its news channel.
The Ministry had issued a warning against TV Today for allegedly telecasting a video wherein an elephant was being mercilessly beaten and fire was thrown at him.
#DelhiHighCourt
Counsel appearing for TV Today submits that a disclaimer was shown before the video, and this was to show the brutality on animal.

Court: The video should have been blurred.

Counsel: The concept of blurring in case of animals is unknown.
Read 4 tweets
LawBeat Profile picture
Aug 30
BREAKING: Advocate @AshwiniUpadhyay tells #DelhiHighCourt that the Court cannot be mute
spectator if followers of Indian religions are being converted to foreign religion by force, allurement.

Upadhyay filed additional affidavit in his plea against forceful religious conversion
Upadhyay submits that "religious conversion by intimidating, threatening and
deceivingly luring through gifts and monetary benefits is an offence
Ghaziabad (Uttar Pradesh) but not in adjoining East Delhi."
He argues that similarly, religious conversion using black magic and superstition
is offence in Gurugram and Faridabad but not in adjoining West
and South Delhi, which not only contrary to the Articles 14 but is also
conflicting to the principles of secularism and rule of law.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(