Ryan Goodman Profile picture
Aug 31 15 tweets 7 min read
Key in the DOJ brief are new revelations of facts that go to the core of Trump's criminal liability.

Fact-1: Trump never claimed the documents were declassified.

End of story on that attempted defense or attempt to deter prosecutors from indicting (as a discretionary factor).
2. Looks like Justice Department has one or more people dead to rights on obstruction, 18 USC 1519.

These newly revealed facts also goes to 18 USC 402 (disobeying the GJ subpoena).

@AWeissmann_ has identified 402 as potentially easiest road to an indictment for MAL.

Plus...
3. Plus these passages on obstruction directly implicate Trump's lawyers in the alleged crimes.

That's NOT going to play out well for Trump if DOJ follows past practice.

I discussed in earlier thread how prosecutors could put the lawyers on the stand.👇
4. There it is. In black and white.

The false certification by Trump's lawyers on June 3.

Note the yellow highlights (mine) that point directly to trouble for Donald Trump - for obstruction and concealment.
5. In another passage about June 3 retrieval of classified documents, DOJ states:

Yet again, never a peep by Trump's side with any claim that he had declassified the documents.

Plus Trump counsel's actions suggested they believed the docs were classified.
6. Hard to keep track of all the false statements by Trump's counsel to the Department of Justice/FBI!

Here are more:

- that all records from the White House were stored in one location
- that there were no records in Trump's office space
7. New facts: June 3 search turned up (based on FBI preliminary review):

38 documents with classification markings
16 SECRET
17 TOP SECRET

Including "markings reflecting sensitive compartments and dissemination controls" -- indicating government's most highly guarded secrets.
8. This line points directly at Donald Trump.

In August 8 search, classified documents were

- not simply found in MAL
- not simply found outside the storage room
- not simply found in Trump's office

but found in the desks in his office.

He needs to think about a plea deal.
9. More evidence Trump disobeyed subpoena and concealed more docs.

Recall Trump team certified on June 3 "a diligent search was conducted of the boxes that were moved from the White House to Florida."

Yet FBI found this on Aug 8👇

Including the unmissable colored cover sheets.
10. This is a powerful line, and one that a close reader has already come to think by this point.

It's incriminating that the FBI found "in a matter of hours" two times amount of docs with classified markings as Trump team had weeks to locate.

PLUS and this is a big plus...
11. Important what happens here:

June 3:
Trump team "explicitly prohibited" DOJ looking inside other boxes in storage room to see if other docs with classified markings there (p. 13).

August 8 FBI search:
FBI finds 76 docs with classified markings in same dang storage room!
12. Hats off to @AWeissmann_ who called it from the moment Trump team filed their motion with a litany of false statements.

It opened the door for DOJ to publicly correct the record in Response brief.

Trump's legal team, and their client, again with self-inflicted wounds.
13. Yep.👇

@ryanjreilly: "The passports themselves, and their location, are very good evidence that Trump unlawfully retained national defense information."

Active passports in same drawer as classified docs. Prosecutors could even note that at trial.
14. Keyword: comingled

When Trump/his lawyers say the FBI also took some personal belongings, remember:

That's apparently because it was comingled with classified docs and thus likely EVIDENCE he was willfully retaining the classified materials!

15. I'll end with this fine point by @waltshaub:

"If the FBI found these documents in your home, you would go to jail."

Now imagine being found with over 300 of these classified documents (and the first 100 documents totaling more than 700 pages)!

<end>

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Ryan Goodman

Ryan Goodman Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @rgoodlaw

Sep 1
Truly nonsensical what Judge Cannon may do here.

Executive privilege
does
not
work
this
way.

She indicated she may appoint special master “to screen documents for any potentially subject to executive privilege claims by Trump.”

Compounding the problem…
politico.com/news/2022/09/0…
2. Compounding the problem

She indicates this approach will keep one part of Exec Branch (FBI) from accessing materials upon review of “executive privilege”

while …

Making an exception so that another part of the Exec Branch (ODNI/IC) has access for damage assessment.
🤔
3. Plus how does one put the toothpaste back in the tube?

The DOJ/FBI surely now has knowledge of the classified and other presidential records they retrieved from MAL.

Thanks to reporting from @joshgerstein @kyledcheney @nicholaswu12

politico.com/news/2022/09/0…
Read 4 tweets
Aug 28
We generally do not publish on Sundays, but did today.

This important article gets to the core of Trump's request for a Special Master to keep "executive privilege" docs from FBI.

A great expert @mls1776 analytically decimates that idea.

justsecurity.org/82873/assessin…
2. "Notion that a former president can block his successor from accessing presidential records...needs for purposes of carrying out executive functions would be the most extreme manifestation of a doubtful legal theory, and one that has no support in any legal authority to date."
3. And this on-point quote from the legislative history of the Presidential Records Act. 👇

"We cannot allow the most secret documents to be taken away every 4 years and treated like the personal property of a private citizen—the ex-President of the United States. ..."
Read 4 tweets
Aug 27
I discussed w/@KateBolduan @kaitlancollins @OutFrontCNN

MAL Affidavit points to obstruction/concealment:

- 06/08 DOJ instructs: Keep all docs in storage room

- 08/05 Aug affidavit: Probable cause docs now in other rooms

- 08/08 FBI search: Docs found in Trump bedroom & office
2. Plus @kaitlancollins's point that DOJ clearly concerned about Trump's obstruction and cited that as a big reason for redactions, and judge agreed.
3. Here's the Washington Post report I discussed in @OutFrontCNN segment.

Reporting that in August search, FBI found documents "in Trump’s bedroom, office and a first-floor storage room."

(by @jdawsey1 @CarolLeonnig @JaxAlemany @PostRoz)
washingtonpost.com/national-secur…
Read 4 tweets
Aug 24
“It could not be determined who was involved with packing the boxes at Mar-a-Lago or why some White House documents were not sent to the Archives, though people familiar with the episode said Trump OVERSAW THE PROCESS HIMSELF—and did so with great secrecy”
washingtonpost.com/national-secur…
2. Not what one would exactly call ‘cooperative’:

“Trump only agreed to return some of the documents after a National Archives official asked a Trump adviser for help, saying they may have to soon refer the matter to Congress or the Justice Department.”

washingtonpost.com/national-secur…
3. Not just reporters. FBI has info that puts this on Trump:

“FBI … interviews with others in Trump’s orbit, including valets and former White House staffers...
Agents were told that Trump was a pack rat who had been personally overseeing his collection of White House records.”
Read 5 tweets
Aug 23
!! National Archives letter to Trump attorney, May 10, 2022.

First note what's missing from the exchanges

ANY CLAIM by Trump's side that he'd declassified the materials.

Full Text: justsecurity.org/wp-content/upl…

Letter was published by John Solomon
(h/t @JasonLeopold @MollyJongFast)
2. The letter confirms Trump was told by NARA the first batch of materials contained "over 100 documents with classification markings, comprising more than 700 pages. Some include the highest levels of classification, including Special Access Program (SAP) materials."

700 pages!
3. Letter is a slam dunk on 'executive privilege.'

Citing on-point Supreme Court decision (Nixon v. GSA), the Office of Legal Counsel and NARA explained there was no legal basis whatsoever for Trump.

Plus "President Biden defers to my determination" with OLC on exec privilege.
Read 7 tweets
Aug 23
"Mr. Trump went through the boxes himself in late 2021, according to multiple people briefed on his efforts, before turning them over."

nytimes.com/2022/08/22/us/…
2. "The F.B.I. agents who conducted the search found the additional documents in the storage area in the basement of Mar-a-Lago, as well as in a container in a closet in Mr. Trump’s office."
3. Lawyers who drafted & signed false statement come into focus:

"Corcoran then drafted a statement, which Ms Bobb, who is said to be the custodian of the documents, signed. It asserted that, to the best of her knowledge, all classified material that was there had been returned"
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(