High inflation, rising energy costs around the world, rising food prices, supply chain issues…
These are all policy disasters and they’ve got little to do with what your government says the root causes are.
A thread 🧵 for your awareness 👇
California declaring every new vehicle sold after 2035 must be green, then asking residents to stop charging vehicles when the energy grid is stressed… it’s energy policy is a joke
German energy policy has been a huge disaster in this decade. First think about energy independence, then think about shutting down your nuclear power plants for some green reasons. Don’t put your energy dependence on other nations who could easily take advantage of it 🤷♂️
Follow China 🇨🇳 if possible only for your nuclear energy policy. Don’t follow China for the coal & fossil fuel based energy policy. China has been the largest green house gas emitter and they need to bring this down drastically.
Way too much power is given to oil producing nations like Saudi 🇸🇦
Nations should be slowly weaning off fossil fuels. They should have strategic reserves of oil stored. Nations should not stop drilling for oil & not stop pipeline projects until they’re energy independent.
The west should be wise enough to play their energy cards close to their chest rather than giving it away to a mad man… they can’t do much now. They’ve dug themselves into a hole.
This is what happens to countries who have thoughtless irresponsible short term energy policies 🤷♂️
Venezuela 🇻🇪 the worlds largest crude oil reserves state… its bankrupt right now. That’s the power of sanctions. US and it’s allies pretty much pushed Venezuela into a death spiral and to top it all off they can’t access their own gold worth $1.8 billion sitting in BOE vaults
German parties this winter 😂
Hahaha 😂😂
What happens if you go 💯 electric
People are burning their energy bills in Naples as a protest to high energy prices. Playing #CatchMeIfYouCan with the energy companies 😂
Few ways out…
- Energy companies go bankrupt
- Reduce energy bills (print money)
- Do the right thing (policy)
Energy bills going up from 60k to 420k pounds for this one pub. Consider leaving a big tip next time.
In the shadowed annals of empire, the invasion of Iraq revealed the blueprint: invent an existential threat, amplify it through every megaphone of power, then unleash hell under the banner of salvation. Weapons of mass destruction—those ghostly specters that never materialized—served as the perfect phantom, terrifying enough to silence dissent yet vague enough to evade accountability when the lie collapsed. The true prize was never aluminum tubes or yellowcake; it was the second-largest proven oil reserves on Earth, waiting to be liberated from a dictator and delivered into the hands of Western corporations. The war was sold as a moral crusade, but the receipts came later in the form of no-bid contracts and decades of guaranteed crude flowing through friendly pipelines.
Venezuela now stands in the crosshairs of the same script, only the boogeyman has been rebranded for a new century. Where once we feared mushroom clouds, we are now instructed to tremble before weapons of mass intoxication—tons of cocaine allegedly funneled through Caracas by a regime painted as the kingpin of global narco-terrorism. The opioid crisis ravaging American towns becomes the emotional battering ram, the humanitarian catastrophe of Venezuelan migrants the moral veneer, while the real objective glitters beneath the Orinoco Belt: the largest oil reserves on the planet, currently outside the grip of ExxonMobil and Chevron. The pattern is identical—demonize, destabilize, invade or install a compliant regime—only this time the pretext is not yellowcake but white powder, and the war will be waged not with tanks rolling across the desert but with sanctions, proxy forces, and perhaps, when the moment is ripe, a "limited intervention" to stop the drugs and secure the wells. History does not repeat; it simply changes costumes.
MOST OF EUROPE HAS DEVOLVED INTO AN ORWELLIAN DYSTOPIA PRIORITIZING IMMIGRANTS OVER CITIZENS, PRIORITIZING CENSORSHIP AND TYRANNY OVER FREE SPEECH
Britain's justice system has become a grotesque betrayal of its own people, prioritizing the leniency of foreign criminals over the safety and dignity of native citizens. In cases where migrants commit heinous acts like assaulting vulnerable young girls, courts hand down sentences that are laughably mild, often mere slaps on the wrist that allow perpetrators to roam free far too soon. Meanwhile, ordinary Brits who dare to protest against this influx of danger—standing up for their communities and demanding accountability—are slammed with harsher punishments, locked away for longer periods as if their righteous anger is the real crime. This inverted priority exposes a government more concerned with appeasing international optics and virtue-signaling tolerance than protecting the innocent, leaving families shattered and streets unsafe while rewarding those who prey on the weak.
By shielding immigrant offenders with soft sentencing and aggressive policing of dissent, Britain has effectively sided with the predators, eroding the social contract that once promised security and justice for all. Citizens watch in horror as resources pour into housing and supporting migrants, even those with criminal records, while victims of their violence receive scant support or closure. This systemic failure fosters a culture of fear and resentment, where the rule of law bends to multicultural mandates rather than upholding the rights of the law-abiding majority. In doing so, the nation not only fails its people but actively undermines their trust, paving the way for deeper divisions and a society where native lives seem expendable in the name of misguided compassion.
Oh, sure, because nothing says "democracy" like making sure every Tom, Dick, and undocumented Harry can waltz into a polling booth without so much as flashing a library card—after all, why bother with pesky proof when we've got all those other life essentials locked down tighter than a bank vault?
Democrats, in their infinite wisdom, apparently think that requiring ID for voting is just a sneaky Republican plot to keep the unwashed masses from exercising their sacred right to pull a lever, because heaven forbid we treat elections with the same rigor as picking up a six-pack or enrolling little Timmy in daycare.
It's not like voting could possibly influence, say, the entire country's future or anything; nope, that's totally on par with forgetting your ID at the pharmacy and having to reschedule your allergy meds pickup. How dare we impose such burdensome barriers on the one activity where fraud is about as common as a politician keeping a promise?
But wait, there's more hilarity… Democrats oppose voter ID because, gasp, it turns out getting that shiny piece of plastic can cost money, time, and a small sacrifice to the DMV gods—things that disproportionately hit poor folks, minorities, and the elderly who, coincidentally, might not vote for the party of tax cuts for billionaires.
It's almost as if these laws are less about stopping the mythical hordes of bus-riding imposters and more about engineering a voter turnout that's whiter and wealthier than a country club brunch. Who needs evidence of widespread fraud when you can just wave around memes implying hypocrisy, ignoring that voting is a constitutional right, not a privilege like boarding a plane or buying a firearm? Democrats must be cackling in their secret lairs, plotting to let everyone vote so easily that actual democracy breaks out—what a diabolical scheme!
BOTH DEMOCRATS AND REPUBLICANS ARE PROTECTING ELITE PEDOPHILES REFLECTING A DEEP SYSTEMIC ROT IN AMERICAN POLITICS
In the shadowy corridors of American power, both Democrats and Republicans have a vested interest in shielding pedophiles and suppressing explosive lists like those tied to Jeffrey Epstein and Sean "Diddy" Combs. This bipartisan complicity stems from a shared ecosystem of elite influence, where high-profile figures from both parties have been entangled in these scandals. Democrats, with connections to figures like Bill Clinton who flew on Epstein's plane multiple times, and Republicans, including ties to Donald Trump who once praised Epstein's social circle, recognize that full disclosure could unravel their mutual networks of donors, lobbyists, and power brokers. By stonewalling investigations and slow-walking document releases, they preserve a fragile truce that protects their own from accountability, ensuring that the political machine continues uninterrupted. This isn't mere oversight; it's a calculated defense of the status quo, where exposing one side's skeletons risks toppling the entire house of cards.
Beyond personal entanglements, the protection racket thrives on financial incentives that transcend party lines. Epstein's web of influence included Wall Street titans and Hollywood moguls who funneled millions into campaigns on both sides of the aisle, creating a dependency that neither Democrats nor Republicans dare disrupt. Similarly, Diddy's empire, with its deep roots in entertainment and business, has donated to politicians across the spectrum, buying silence and favors. Releasing these lists would not only implicate individuals but also expose the corrupt underbelly of campaign finance, where dark money from compromised sources props up elections. Both parties, reliant on this influx of cash to maintain their grip on power, collude in burying the truth—through sealed court documents, delayed FOIA requests, and media deflection—to safeguard their economic lifelines, proving that when it comes to self-preservation, ideology takes a back seat to greed.
Ultimately, this bipartisan cover-up reflects a deeper systemic rot in American institutions, where justice is subordinated to elite solidarity. Pedophiles like those on these lists aren't just isolated predators; they're often embedded in a class of untouchables who wield influence over lawmakers, judges, and intelligence agencies. Democrats and Republicans alike benefit from this arrangement, as it allows them to control narratives, manipulate public outrage, and divert attention to partisan battles that distract from real accountability. By protecting these lists, they perpetuate a cycle of impunity that erodes public trust and shields the powerful from the consequences ordinary citizens would face. In the end, it's not about left or right—it's about an entrenched oligarchy ensuring that the veil remains intact, lest the masses demand a reckoning that could dismantle the entire facade.