Thread by @WallsOther

1) More from @barnes_law on the raid: Because the subpoena was on the ENTITY, and not on Trump PERSONALLY, they deliberately tried to keep Trump from invoking various Constitutional rights.

2) The FBI said they had to keep the info secret, then disclosed it, showing that . . .

@barnes_law 2) contd . . . they all along attempted to fight this in the court of public opinion, NOT in front of a grand jury. (First time they have ever done a photo of supposedly classified docs, which could of itself be a federal crime by the FBI).

3) All due to America's "public. . .

@barnes_law 3) conbted . . . ignorance of the law".

4) "They could always go rogue with the DC system and indict anyway, but legally they have nothing.

5) This "confirms that this is a Deep State raid for Deep State documents (i.e., FISAs)"

@barnes_law 6) Another tipoff that this is Deep State not legal is how they are fighting the Special Master.

7) Trump argues docs should be removed from DOJ custody. The fact that DOJ is fighting this, it reveals DOJ doesn't want ANYONE to see what's in these docs.

@barnes_law 8) DOJ didn't find what they wanted. Guy running the op had to resign rather than being exposed to an Inspector General investigation removing it from IG & putting authority back to corrupt DOJ which can protect him.

@barnes_law 9) "Trump is NOT in as precarious a position as all the commentators think," but the fact that the Deep State sees him as an "existential threat" to their power.

@barnes_law 10) It's very important, as Barnes shows, that the subpoena was against Donald Trump the OFFICE, and not the person of Donald Trump, which no one gets cuz they can't read a damn subpoena.

@barnes_law 11) The process is unfolding where the INjustice system only shows us some of the cards. No transparency at all.

12) the Trump case proves that Julian Assange was right in his legal challenges.