Trading players used in limited special competitions is a really effective method as the 'meta' players change week to week.
In specialists, most people buy at least one card for their lineup, because the u40 average cap is so restrictive.
Because they only care about the player for that given GW, prices can rise rapidly as that player is significantly better in this single GW, than they usually would be.
Therefore, our trading opportunity comes from identifying these meta players for a single GW, before...
...the managers playing S05 buy them.
1. Identify the players 2. Buy the cards 3. Sell into the pre-GW rush
Simple.
Timing the Buy
L15 averages for special comps lock in after the penultimate GW.
This means that for a weekend GW, a player's average locks in for special comps after their previous weekend game.
So for GW302, the special comp average locks once a player has played in 300...
...even if they play again in 301.
This means we can see which players are eligible by the weekend close on Tuesday, or for most teams, we can see on Monday - these are the buying days.
Picking the Players
I use 7 main factors when selecting players.
One thing to remember is that when selling, buyers are buying based on their perception, not necessarily the facts 🔍
1. Utility
We want players who fit under the Average Score Cap, because the player pool for these slots is much smaller.
Specialist u40 is the smallest pool, with Underdog u45 and u50 the other key ones.
Also, look at players who may be picked for multiple comps...
...such as Challenger Specialist, Underdog u45 and Specialist.
For example, in GW302 Sven Mijnans is u40 eligible, playing in Chal Europe, making him a viable option for all 3 of those comps as the u40 option in specialist, or a u45 pick in underdog.
2. Fixture
Obviously, being a heavy favourite to win the game is an important factor. To check this, you can look at betting odds to see how favourable a fixture is.
Anything lower than 2.0 is good, lower than 1.4 will primarily be big teams, so...
...between 1.4-1.8 can identify solid teams with good fixtures, whose players generally rise most.
Moreover, a lot of buyers won't look this deeply, meaning that their perception of a fixture can influence their decision heavily. This brings me to my next factor.
3. Team/Player Reputation
As we mentioned, the strength of fixture is a key factor. However, people often rely on their perception of the matchup rather than the stats or facts.
Therefore, team reputation is a big factor, where people assume teams with big reputations are good, and lesser known teams are bad.
Using SD, you can see the badges of teams, so people see a badge they don't know well (maybe a newly promoted side) and assume they are bad.
Using Mijnans again as example, people see Sparta Rotterdam v Volendam and immediately assume Sparta are a heavy favourite as Volendam is a small, lesser-known newly promoted side, and they may not recognise the badge.
The same works for teams with a strong reputation, where people immediately assume they must be heavy favourites because they are a big side. This can be applied to players as well, but as we are primarily targetting lower-end cards, it’s not such a big factor.
4. Home Advantage
Home advantage is a strong factor in many leagues, although certain teams/players gain more/less advantage than others. However, playing at home is generally seen as a good thing, making these fixtures more desirable.
People will rarely check to see if a team/player has a strong home advantage, and instead will assume that home is better, making these cards more desirable.
For leagues such as MLS where Home advantage is notoriously strong, this may be a bigger factor.
5. Opponent Average Score
Even though I personally don’t rely much on this, because of the variation of scoring between different player roles, the SD opponent averages are commonly used by Sorare players to pick cards.
Therefore, when this shows a high score, people will immediately assume this is a good fixture for that player.
Colour indicators are commonly used in many financial or statistical environments to allow quick interpretations of numbers - these are incredibly powerful.
How often do we hear people talk about ‘green scores’?
A score could go from green to not green due to 0.1 points, yet the perception of each score is different. The point is, a nice green opponent average score is very desirable.
6. Average Score Variation
This one isn't vital, but targetting players with L5 or L40 averages superior to their L15 is only a good thing.
When an L15 average drops below a Specialist Cap (eg. 40), but their L5/L40 are significantly higher, this is a quick way for people to..
...infer that the player doesn't ‘belong’ below that score cap.
I don’t give this that much weight because I have repeatedly earned good returns with players of which this is NOT the case.
Again, Sven Mijnans this week. His L5 is 39 and L40 is 42, importantly they are both...
...yellow on SD, but he has returned ~100% on his limited this week. If the players has this average score situation, that is good, but is not essential.
7. Game Time
Finally, when people are scouting through a list of players they don’t know well, they will take a look at the % of games played on SD, and quickly ignore a player if its 60% or below on the L5.
Especially if this is paired with a L5 <35.
Target players who are regular starters, and who show this on SD.
Even if you know the player will start, if they haven't started in the last few games people won't take the risk.
Selling
Selling is fairly simple.
People will focus on building these lineups from Tuesday night-Friday morning, so this is when to sell.
Closer to the deadline you can get the highest price as there are increasingly fewer sellers, however, this comes with the risk of not...
...selling your card because there are also fewer buyers. Try to spread sales across a couple of days if you have multiple cards of one player.
Budget
This method is tough on rares or SRs, as they’re illiquid. I’ve tried it frequently but it doesn't work well, and limiteds are vastly superior given their liquidity.
Therefore, you don’t need a big budget at all.
People don't want to spend loads on a one-week player, so cheaper players with good fixtures can see a bigger % rise than the top players.
Also, you don't want to buy more than ~5 cards of one player as selling a lot of cards can be tricky.
GW302 Examples:
Gerardo Arteaga, L15 44
1. Eligible for Chal SP, SP, U45, U50 2. Playing Sint-Truiden, 1.65 favourite 3. Genk strong Sorare reputation 4. Home 5. Oppo avg 47 (not amazing but ok) 6. 61 L5 (Dark Green) 7. 100% L5 game time
Mon-Fri Rise: 50%
Sven Mijnans, L15 34
1. Eligible for u40 slot in SP and Chal SP, U45 2. Volendam, 1.65 favourite + looks easy 3. Volendam poor rep 4. Home 5. 57 oppo avg 6. L5 and L40 both 5+ over L15 7. 100% L5 games played
Mon-Fri Rise: 97%
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The Numbers game, @DavidSally6 & Christopher Anderson -
In my opinion the best book out there for developing your knowledge and understanding of football. My book is full of turned pages and scribbles highlighting actionable advice, often challenging common beliefs.
It’s an overall look at football performance using numbers, but rather than being super technical or analytical the book explains the theories clearly with examples and anecdotes, then backs them with numbers or facts.
Odgaard recently signed from Sassuolo for £3.7m, after a strong 21/22 season on loan at Waalwijk.
When starting last season, Odgaard averaged 53.5pts per game, helped by his 0.51 G+A/90.
While he certainly benefited from being their talisman, Waalwijk finished as the 10th best side, with Odgaard directly involved in 40% of their goals.
Following some early European transfers, here are 3 Elite tier u23 stacks to consider for the new season, with Mid and Lower tier options coming this weekend 👀
PSG have signed creative midfielder Vitinha for ~£37m.
Following poor midfield signings in the last few seasons, they lack a trusted midfield trio behind their forward line.
Despite playing with just 3, they had six CMs with over 1200 minutes last season.
Vitinha looks to be an excellent solution to this problem. With his deep field passing and comfort on the ball, he provides creativity from outside the 18yard box.
He averaged a 73% dribble success rate and a 55% duel success rate, while completing 90% of his passes...
While there are a few 4.0m defenders expected to move to starting roles at new teams, Neco Williams at Forest looks to be the best pick.
Neco played 14 games on loan at Fulham in the second half of 21/22, where he scored 2G and 2A in 1200minutes, for a goal involvement every 3.3 games. Forest are expected to play a 3atb system, where Neco would operate as the right wing-back.
The giant clubs of world football are often perceived as too big to fall. They have too much history, financial backing or a big enough fanbase to protect them from prolonged periods of downfall.
Yet just in the last couple of decades, we’ve seen clubs including Liverpool, Arsenal, Milan and now Manchester United have periods of prolonged decline.