In light of Biden's speech last night, some pro-life reflections upon @saletan's insight that the GOP's strategy, which Trump has taken to a new level, is based on "inserting lies into conventional moral appeals":
I and my fellow US pro-lifers made a deal with the devil. 1/x
The GOP said, "We'll save the unborn if you let us promote the death penalty."
The US pro-life movement said, "Sure."
The GOP said, "We'll save the unborn if you let us defund programs that help poor families raise and educate healthy children."
Pro-lifers said, "Sweet!"
2/x
The GOP said, "We'll save the unborn if you let us demonize the poor as parasites, welfare queens, and illegal aliens."
The US pro-life movement said, "That's fine."
The GOP said, "We'll save the unborn if you let us defend torture."
Pro-lifers said, "No problem there."
3/x
The GOP said, "We'll save the unborn if you let us oppose free universal healthcare."
US pro-lifers said, "OK!"
The GOP said, "We'll save the unborn if you let us demonize the 99.9 % of climate scientists warning of human-caused climate change."
Pro-lifers said, "Great!"
4/x
The GOP said, "We'll save the unborn if you let us mock and threaten those seeking to protect themselves and their loved ones from a deadly worldwide pandemic."
The US pro-life movement replied, "[*cough*] We salute you! And Grandma would too if she hadn't died of COVID."
5/x
The GOP said, "We'll save the unborn if you let us write abortion-banning laws without consulting doctors on safeguards to protect mothers' lives."
US pro-lifers replied, "Abortion bans? Did someone say abortion bans? Why consult doctors? Ban first and ask questions later!"
6/x
Finally, the GOP said, "We'll save the unborn if you accept our election lies--lies that, when translated into concrete action (as in 1/6), will deliver a death blow to American democracy."
The US pro-life movement said, "If that's what it takes, that's what it takes!"
7/x
And now that the US pro-life movement has sold itself to the GOP, and the GOP has sold itself to MAGA, President Biden says MAGA forces who would "take away a woman's right to choose" are a threat to democracy.
The pro-life movement cannot deny that is what it has become.
8/x
I am, and will always be, pro-life.
I repent of the devil's bargain I made with the GOP when I was part of the US's tainted pro-life movement.
The only moral way to protect the unborn in the political sphere is by winning hearts for life within a functioning democracy.
9/x
Democracy, and the individual freedoms and responsibilities it enables, is the first-order value that makes a culture of life possible. Without it, we're left to the whims of strongmen who, even if they protect the unborn, will persecute Catholics and all who oppose them.
10/x
See, for example, Ortega's "pro-life" Nicaragua, which insists that women carry even ectopic pregnancies to term, while jailing and torturing Catholic clergy and laity for their faith.
I hope that one day the Democratic Party will again make room for @demsforlife.
11/x
And I hope very much that the GOP will reject Trump and Trumpism, root and branch, rejecting "stolen-election" lies and standing for truth.
I hope too for a viable pro-life third-party and for proportional representation (ranked-choice) voting to strengthen our democracy.
12/x
But in the meantime, as a pro-life Catholic, I see no alternative but to stand with @POTUS for the nation's soul, against Trump and Trumpism, against what the GOP has become.
I make no apologies for that. And no pro-life Catholic who believes in democracy should have to.
13/x
. It's the threat posed by a GOP that refuses to reject Trump's election lies. It's the threat of the US falling under a "pro-life" strongman as did Nicaragua. 2/x
Chuck Donovan cites @CCamosy's article offering advice for the GOP. I want to respond to that. But first, since Chuck is bringing him into a thread in which he said that many pro-lifers were Never Trumpers, let's look back at Dr. Camosy in 2016. 3/x
I recently requested prayers, as I had a meeting at a diocese that I hoped might lead to a job.
Well, your prayers & mine were answered: I *wasn't* hired, but I trust that means the Lord has something better.
Now I have two more prayer requests + an offer to pray for you:
1/x
1) Please keep praying the Lord will lead me to a position that will engage at least some of my abilities as a Catholic theologian/canon lawyer/writer/editor/sparkplug/etc.
2) Tonight, the vigil of my birthday, I renew my annual dedication of my celibacy. ...
2/x
I first dedicated my celibacy to Jesus's Sacred Heart through Mary's Immaculate Heart in 2013. This will be my tenth annual promise. Please pray that I receive the grace to live out my dedication to Jesus through Mary and to grow in my celibate vocation.
This week @OrbisBooks confirmed to me that my biography of Fr Ed Dowling SJ (bookshop.org/books/father-e…) will be in stores Dec. 1. So I'm thrilled to be able finally to plan my book tour! Thus far I've confirmed dates in DC & MD, & am working to confirm ones in OH, TN, & MO. 1/x
But here's the deal: I want to speak about Fr Ed EVERYWHERE--every state, every country, every place that'll have me. The advance response to my bio of him (see @amazon for more endorsements: amazon.com/Father-Ed-Stor…) bears witness that his story has great power to inspire. 2/x
To me, speaking about Fr Ed is a missionary task, so I'm willing to go anywhere that'll host me and accept whatever they can offer. I'm hoping that, as with other missionaries, I'll find that what I receive from the more well-off sponsors will make up for those less well-off. 3/x
Certainly, per canon law, Bishop DeGrood has a responsibility to teach the Catholic faith, & as a shepherd he has the right to make particular law for his diocese. And most of his new policies are in line with accepted canonical practice. But a few are dangerously ambiguous. 2/x
By "dangerously ambiguous," I mean that a few of the new policies require clarification--otherwise they harm the faithful's rights & won't withstand an appeal to the Holy See.
The ambiguity is present in the policies on reception of adult Baptism, Confirmation, and Eucharist. 3/x
The latest CatholicVote video makes the seemingly innocuous point that churches should do marriage ministry. However, it features JP De Gance of Communio (not the journal), which harvests data under the guise of helping churches minister to couples. (1/x)
The bottom line of "People You May Know" is that Communio's goal isn't about fostering marriages for marriages' sake, or even about fostering marriages for the sake of boosting churchgoing. It's really an effort funded by the secretive Council for National Policy, ... (3/x)
The award for today's pettiest controversy goes to the heresy hunters who are all atwitter over @JamesMartinSJ's referring to Jesus as a "human being." Father Martin's accusers fail to note that he is using the term "human _being_," which is not the same as "human person." 1/x
Father Martin well knows that Jesus is a divine Person. But Jesus also has a human operation--what John of Damascus calls his human "energy"--that enables him to act in a human manner.
Granted, Thomas Aquinas, centuries after John, will distinguish "operation" from "being." 2/x
Thomas does this to avoid terminology that might lead to calling Jesus a human person (See ST III q. 19 a. 1 ad 4: newadvent.org/summa/4019.htm….) But though the Church usually follows Thomas & avoids calling Jesus a "human being," not every orthodox theologian's gotten the memo. 3/x