Here's the perfect formula to write a literature review paragraph.
A great literature review paragraph needs exactly 2 components.
Most students think every paper needs its own paragraph.
Completely off the mark.
The secret?
Combine synthesis + evaluation:
• Find papers with similar findings
• Group them under one theme
• Connect everything together
• Add critique for each study
Example:
Bad:
"Smith (2020) studied caffeine. Jones (2021) also studied caffeine."
Good:
"Studies show caffeine boosts performance in endurance athletes (Smith, 2020; Jones, 2021), though dosage timing remains debated. While Smith found pre-workout intake optimal, Jones demonstrated mid-workout consumption produced stronger results in elite runners."
See the difference?
One uses contrasting to tell a story.
One just glances over the studies.
A systematic review requires exhaustive, comprehensive searching with quality assessment criteria, while a rapid review can be completed with time-limited formal quality assessment. The difference is months of work.
According to this paper, 14 literature review types exist.
→ You need thorough certainty
→ Time isn't the main factor
→ Quality is everything
Pick rapid when:
→ You need quick insights
→ Time drives decisions
→ Good enough works
Don't overcomplicate this.
Your timeline decides.
Source: Grant, M. J., & Booth, A. (2009). A typology of reviews: An analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Information & Libraries Journal, 26(2), 91–108. DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x
Which review type fits your project?
Join 6,913+ researchers if you like snack-sized research tips like this: go.lennartnacke.com/newsletter
Chat PDF in Paperpal just changed how I read research papers.
Just uploaded a systematic review paper and my jaw dropped.
Here's what happened:
1. Instant paper breakdown
• Title, authors, DOI extracted automatically
• Smart summary generated in seconds
• Key sections identified and linked
• Research questions pulled out precisely
2. Smart paper connections
• Found relevant papers I hadn't discovered
• Connected papers across different fields
• Added them to my library with one click
• Surfaced hidden relationships
But the real magic? The built-in question engine.
Instead of scrolling endlessly, I clicked "Provide a summary of the discussion section" and got 6 key points with direct links to my source text.
Want to try something powerful?
Upload your PDF and ask:
• "What are the main findings?"
• "Describe the methodology"
• "List the research questions"
It finds answers instantly, with links to the exact paper sections to double-check.