This whole game of “election misinformation” is tiring. That’s what EVERY campaign consists of. By responding with “the Hunter laptop story was true!” we are accepting their premise that elections can ever be “misinformation-free.”
They had been subtle for years, slowly creeping the term “fake news” into our discourse. Trump saw what was happening, and attacked their overall premise. That was his appeal, he didn’t play their game, he showed how petty and underhanded they are.
But we’ve let “misinformation,” “disinformation,” “election interference,” and other bullshit terms define the acceptable scope of our national debates. They can’t win in battles of ideas, so they attack and distort language itself.
THREAD: First of all, @DanCrenshawTX, being a prick throughout your thread is not really a good way to convince people of the “truth” you claim to espouse. Secondly, your bait-and-switch in the language you use is rather apparent… 1/5
You first insinuate the bill doesn’t “kick unvaccinated service members out of the military,” but later you claim it extends the prohibition against “dishonorable” discharges. Not quite the same thing (as you well know). 2/5
The bill explicitly ALLOWS service members to CONTINUE to be discharged on the sole basis of refusing the COVID vaccine, by ensuring that any such discharge shall only be an “honorable discharge” or “general discharge under honorable conditions.” 3/5
These dates are even more significant when considering that Hannah was being considered for Trump’s envoy to Syria. On February 13, 2018, it was reported that Hannah was being considered for the role. al-monitor.com/originals/2018…
First off, I appreciate the “DreamTeam” moniker (if I am in fact included within that term); but don’t for a second think that anyone you include in that group doesn’t incorporate thoughts, ideas, challenges, debate, or theories into consideration from the rest of this corner. 2/
There are too many facts for ANYONE to have a full grasp of, and there are even more “facts” that aren’t actually facts that pervade anyone’s analysis of the entire picture. Call it bias, misinformation, partisanship, assumptions, whatever you want. 3/
I’m about 95% positive there is another mention or two at least of “the phone” in the emails, but can’t find my notes. Probably scrawled midway through a notebook buried under stacks of paper somewhere… Anyway, I’ll start threading what I have now and add more as I find again.
This was always assumed to be re the Page FISA, but it doesn’t really make sense to read it that way once you stop and think about it.
Well well well, a few more subpoenas that were apparently issued on Sept 22. Some familiar names for this corner!! Follow along for some additional info… 1/x