Those who have been followers for a long time may remember a previous thread ‘Donbas and Kherson: A tale of two fronts’.
And here in lie the point: the Ukrainians are very good at strategy.
Specifically what they keep doing is forcing Russians to make choices that they don’t want to make, and where the outcomes of their choices are all bad.
So what’s going on at the moment?
Caveat: this is super fast paced and hot off the press, so I’ll try and give a few pathways to which way things will go
In a sense, the only peops who know how this will go are the Ukr gen staff, and their US/UK colleagues working w/ them
That is an indicator of what makes them good at strategy (more precisely ‘operational art’) - they are dictating the pace and forcing the Ru to respond to them
Ok - so over the last 3 months, the Ukr have been softening up Kherson - taking territory, gentle shaping of the battlefield.
Then over the last mth or so, they have begun heavily shaping the battlefield and destroying ru C2, log and infrastructure
This caused Ru to strip our units from elsewhere in Ukr to reinforce in Kherson, but it also meant that Ru put lots of its troops on the wrong side of a river in Kherson.
Previously, they’d stripped out troops from elsewhere to do their offensive in the Donbas, and the Ukrainians took advantage of that and started nibbling at Kherson.
Key point - the Russians don’t have nearly enough to do what they want to do, and the Ukrainians are exploiting that by holding the line on Russian attacks and then striking elsewhere.
Then last week or so, the Ukr announced that they were starting their Kherson offensive proper. See this thread:
This has been pretty successful. It’s pinned a lot of Russian troops the wrong side of the Dnipro River, and means the Ukr can take their time.
But because the Russians had stripped troops out of everywhere else to reinforce Kherson (strategically important - see embedded thread two tweets ago), the Ukrainians sensed an opportunity in the north east in Kharkiv.
And this lays bare a huge advantage that the Ukr have over the Ru - interior lines versus exterior lines. If the Ukr (blue) want to shift axis of advance or reinforce look how short a journey it is compared to the Russians.
This give Ukr a SIGNIFICANT advantage in what militaries call balance - they can keep their force balanced and shift reserves or key assets around much easier and faster than the Russians.
So what is happening in Kharkiv?
(I tell you the map that I’ve draw for this is 🤌)
Red is the Ru front line. Red circle is Izyum which is a town the Russians need to hold for logistical reasons if they want to go further into Donbas. Yellow is a KEY railway junction and black is the railway from Russia down which all the supplies come.
So as you can see from my artwork, the Ukr are taking advantage of the thinned out Ru front lines to try and capture that railway junction which will cut the supplies to Izyum, which will cause most of that Ru front to collapse. If they pull that off it’s serious rout time.
But there is something also very interesting.
Kherson front = total news blackout
Kharkiv front = loads of videos of Ru prisoners, positions under attack, Ru equip destroyed etc.
(And Ru telegram channels confirm that on both fronts the Ukr are making significant gains)
So why the difference in what the Ukr are allowing out from the two fronts? They are the masters of info ops (or at least have been so far in the war)
My guess is that Kherson is still the prize or main effort - more important strategically and lots of Ru troops trapped there in the blender.
But they are releasing videos of panicking Ru up in Kharkiv to overload Ru decision making, and maybe force them to redeploy some assets
After all - Kharkiv is not a big front - the Ru there can just retreat across the border. Donbas is more important to Ru, and Crimea even more important still (Kherson is gateway to Crimea)
And so looking forward - my prediction from two days ago still stands - that Kherson is the way to Crimea and Russian collapse, but the Kharkiv front is just a nice little side line that makes that easier.
Why do I think that we are heading for another global war?
A 🧵
I’ve thought this for quite some time, but I also think that the Russian invasion of Ukraine makes it even more likely.
To try and make this a testable proposition, let’s try and define some terms. Say, by 2027, and by global we mean a war involving two or more of the great powers (against each other), with various allies, and in two or more theatres.
A couple of weeks ago (or so) the Russians announced an ‘operational pause’ in the Donbas.
Op pauses are pretty normal in this type of high intensity warfare, because of the vast supplies required and damages inflicted.
Armies sometime just have to take ‘time outs’ to regroup and build up their supplies again.
Although normally you don’t broadcast to everyone that you’re doing it. That’s a big weird an makes it seem like there must be another reason that Russian military activity has decreased.
Zelensky to G7: “We want to finish this war by Christmas”
Let’s just unpack that a little.
A thread.
This thread is gonna zoom out quite a lot from the battlefield; frankly because not much has happened since I threaded last week: the Ukrainians have left Severodonestsk, and they are still making progress towards Kherson. See here for the thread:
By the way, the way the media has handled the battle in Donbas has been shocking. A few outlets who shall remain nameless have been painting leaving Severodonestsk as a strategic defeat for Ukraine—whereas it is quite the opposite. The Ukrainians used it to bleed the Ru AF …