Lindsey Stroud Profile picture
Sep 7 50 tweets 15 min read
1/Epic twitter thread on the JUUL settlement b/c, after years of looking at MSA funding & seeing these AGs all excited to get moneys from a #THR product. I'm pissed. So let's settle in for a wild ride that'll probably end up an op-ed.
2/So, ICYMI, JUUL reached a settlement w/32 states (and 1 territory) regarding it's role in the so-called "youth vaping epidemic."
3/In June 2021, North Carolina was the first state to reach a settlement w/JUUL. Getting $40M over several years.
ncdoj.gov/attorney-gener…
4/In November 2021, the Arizona AG reached a $14.5M settlement w/JUUL
azag.gov/press-release/…
5/In April 2022, Washington reached a $12.5M deal.
atg.wa.gov/news/news-rele…
6/And yesterday's deal was $438.5 million to 33 states and territories.
7/Some states - like MN (which, if you don't recall has it's own tobacco settlement agreement outside of the MSA), is taking JUUL to court in 2023.
kstp.com/kstp-news/loca…
8/But back to the state settlements, let's unpack these. We'll start with North Carolina - home of tobacco subsidies. farm.ewg.org/progdetail.php….
9/North Carolina is due to receive $40 million over six years... Image
10/Which, is a helluva lot more than what the state has used in existing combustible cigarette moneys on programs to help people quit smoking and/or prevent youth use. Image
11/$40M from JUUL over the next 6 years is actually nearly $30M more than what North Carolina spent on tobacco control between 2015 and 2020... Image
12/Note how we're concerned about children... Image
13/Let's do those numbers... (still waiting on 2021 @CDC_DASH) Image
14/But my favorite numbers are the epic lows in smoking rates - even in North Carolina - home of tobacco. And look - since JUUL's market emergence in 2016, smoking rates among 18-24 YO decreased by over 50% Image
15/Moving onto to Arizona. They do a little bit better on funding tobacco control programs. And the JUUL money they're getting is less than what they spend in a year on those programs... Image
16/Yet, still driving on this whole youth vaping epidemic. Image
17/Here's Maricopa County data. (I'll have the whole state eventually) Image
18/But again, disregading the fact that since JUUL entered the Arizona market place, current smoking rates among young adults have declined by nearly one-fourth. Image
19/Next up, Washington State - which, I have been arguing about lack of TC funding since 2018 as it's horribly lacking. Image
20/Seriously, the $22.5M JUUL is to pay to the state is $12.7M more than the $9.8M the state spent on tobacco control programs b/w 2015 and 2020. Image
21/And again, the introduction of JUUL has not led to an increase in smoking among young adults, but rather, a 57.9% decline in the years after. Image
22/Now onto yesterday's bunch. Some are missing as I don't have press releases to find out how much $$$ their state is expected to receive.
23/Arkansas is expected to recieve $13.5M
arkansasag.gov/news_releases/…
24/That's only about $2M more than what the state spent in 2020 on tobacco control programs. Image
25/But again, all about kiddies and misinformation.... Image
26/Again, waiting on 2021 data, but youth vaping rates in 2019 were still lower than youth smoking rates in 1995... Image
27/And further, since the big bad JUUL came, young adult smoking rates have decreased by nearly 40% Image
28/Moving on to Connecticut, which, with Oregon and Texas, led this settlement.
portal.ct.gov/AG/Press-Relea… Image
29/Connecticut's $16.2M is much needed as it's nearly 3.5X more than what the state spent on tobacco control funding between 2015 and 2020. Image
30/Again, with the youth vaping... Image
31/And notably, the reduction in smoking rates among young adults after the introduction of JUUL. Image
32/Back at it (FYI, this is gonna take some time as it's too maddening to actually take several hours to complete this).
33/Next up is Delaware.
news.delaware.gov/2022/09/06/ag-…
34/$7.8M at least from JUUL. More about nicotine... Image
35/The First State does a decent job funding tobacco control... I guess. $7.8M is a tad bit more than what the state spent in 2020, but a lot less than the past six years of funding. Image
36/But, then again, a pack of cigarettes is more than what the state allocates to tobacco control programs for every $100 it is already receiving from the sale of deadly combustible cigarettes. Image
37/Let's talk about that (and vaping)
In 2019, only 13.6% of DE HS students were current vapers. Far below the average for that year and I'm sure the # is lower for 2021.
But check out declines in combustible cigarette use... Image
38/Again, since the market emergence of vaping products (and JUUL), young adult smoking rates have significantly declined. A greater percentage of old folks are smoking in the state than young adults... Image
39/This all has me wondering how they determined how much $$$ each state got. Like, ND is getting the lowest of the amounts (that have been posted) but had the 2nd highest HS current vaping rates in 2019 of this set of states. Image
40/And we're back. Onto the Peach State....
law.georgia.gov/press-releases… Image
41/Again, another state that spends a pitiful amount of cigarette moneys on tobacco control... Image
42/And the $19M is $11M more than what Georgia spent b/w 2015 & 2020 on tobacco control programs... Image
43/Again, "Underage vaping has reached epidemic proportions..."
Yet, what did we do when youth combustible cigarette use was at higher rates than youth vaping? Image
44/And again, the emergence of JUUL (and other vaping products) correlates with a significant decline in smoking rates among young adults in Georgia... Image
45/It's nice having the numbers. Seven states are to receive more $$$ over the next six years than what their state spent on tobacco control programs. Image
46/Looking at you @WilliamTongCT
Seeing that over six years the state spent only $1.2M on tobacco control programs.... Image
47/Now onto Hawaii. I'm surprised they settled seeing the Aloha State has been trying to ban flavored vapes for a few years now.
ag.hawaii.gov/wp-content/upl… Image
48/But still, they spend very little each year on youth vaping prevention... Image
49/Now, in 2019, HI did have one of the highest state vaping rates (at least data from @CDC_DASH shows - btw, when can we get the 2021 results?)
But! Youth smoking is at epic lows. Image
50/And like all the others, the introduction of JUUL - and the growth of vaping in general - correlates w/significant declines in smoking rates among young adults... Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Lindsey Stroud

Lindsey Stroud Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @lmstroud89

Sep 10
1/ I turned it into an oped!

townhall.com/columnists/lin…
2/State spending on youth tobacco and vaping prevention is so low that seven states that have settled their claims against JLI will receive more money from the e-cigarette manufacturer than their state invested in those programs over the past six years.
3/Since 2017, Connecticut has allocated $0 in state funding towards tobacco control programs. In fact, 2016 was the last year the state spent any of its own money on preventing youth vaping, and even then, it was an abysmal $1.2 million. JLI is to pay Connecticut $16.2 million.
Read 5 tweets
Aug 31
1/Video 2 of 5 and more 🧵🧵🧵
2/After watching it, I would recommend that they rename this because it doesn’t talk about evolution of the e-cigarette, but rather, the history of smoking being bad in America. Speaking of that…
3/FDA points out “In 1964, the U.S. Surgeon General released a report warning the public about smoking, including the risk of lung cancer.”
Read 16 tweets
Aug 31
1/Another day, another 🧵.
This time at the @FDATobacco & this spiffy video series that seems to be made using Bloomberg's PR firm...
We'll start with teen use. Get ready for a wild ride that will make you angry, but it ain't even the worst.
2/"E-cigarette use among young people has increased.”
Shame on the FDA seriously. This is what the 2021 NYTS found. The FDA should be informing the public of this – not using old data to hype up alarmism. Image
4/"Most e-cigarettes contain the addictive chemical nicotine and can also contain other harmful chemicals.”
Read 15 tweets
Aug 30
1/Epic 🧵 time as I can't believe that @SteveForbesCEO would even let @Forbes publish this piece.

forbes.com/health/body/he…
2/Let's start w/the opening sentence which is blatantly false.
3/Federal T-21 was enacted in September of…. 2019. Like three years ago, yo.
Read 34 tweets
Mar 17
🧵🧵🧵Oh thread time (and I've got an op-ed related to this...)
I think it's great that FDA recognizes the amazing lifesaving product that nalaxone provides hundreds of thousands of Americans - and many teens - each day...
However... Image
2/This is the same agency - albeit a different department - that refuses to acknowledge, let alone authorize, tobacco harm reduction products.
3/Also - the FDA is the same agency responsible for the opioid crisis - as they approved the massive marketing of the prescription opioids that created the first wave of the opioid epidemic (and caused massive amounts of deaths just due to pill overdoses)
Read 7 tweets
Mar 16
165/Next witness - another sorority association president.
166/More of the minorities and Big Tobacco
167/She's probably the committee's favorite as she only spoke for 1:15!
Read 232 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(