Patrick Fox Profile picture
Sep 9, 2022 17 tweets 3 min read Read on X
Achtung Panzer!, Kharkiv Front 🧵
This is what successful armored warfare looks like. There are many aspects to what appears to have made this operation work & I'd like to briefly go over a few of them. We'll start from the top & work our way down.
1/
The UAF have pulled off a remarkable strategic deception. By initiating, even telegraphing, an offensive in OpComSouth as their main effort they have successfully induced the Russian command to transfer a considerable number of troops south. Including some higher quality
2/
formations. This seems to have denuded the Russians opposite OpComEast of ready reserves & robust combat units in general. Furthermore the UAF was able to mass combat power in excess of what many analysts (including myself, I must admit) thought was possible.
3/
The UAF have now effectively launched two assaults in two seperate operational areas. A fixing attack at Kherson that the Russians cannot ignore, & an armored/mech deep penetration strike into the rear of Russian forces in the east. This will force Russian commanders to make
4/
hard choices with scarce reserves of combat formations capable of standing up to heavy UAF formations, many of whom are currently out of position to immediately engage thanks to the aforementioned deception in the South. Any redeployment will take time Russia doesn't have.
5/
This appears to have been a coordinated plan. Now to the tactical/operational side. UAF assault units, composed primarily of armored & mechanized formations acting in concert (quantity unknown), overran and shattered Russian front line units - reportedly composed heavily of
6/
DPR/LPR units. UAF formations then maintained the momentum of their advance, continuing deep into the Russian rear areas & preventing Russian lines from reforming & solidifying. The breach was then widened & exploited by follow on units, to a point that it appears to be
7/
destabilizing the entire front north & west of Izium. Russian units in the area of advance have not yet been able to reform coherently enough to mount an effective defense. Those areas (primarily urban) where Russian troops have held together have, correctly, been bypassed
8/
by UAF spearhead units. Pocketed &isolated, these Russians are/will likely be surrounded & compelled to surrender in short order. The UAF has placed primacy on speed & violence of action so as not to slow down their assault units & allow the Russians time to recover.
9/
Currently the Russians are scrambling to reinforce their lines. Lead UAF elements appear to be driving on Kupyansk as their primary objective - a major railway nexus supplying Russian formations. Taking it would have strategic implications for the entire eastern front.
10/
There are already reports of UAF units in or near the outskirts of the city, given the condition of Russian resistance - they are highly plausible IMO. Further information indicates UAF units are expanding their breach south, with an eastern boundary along the Oskol river.
11/
If the Russians cannot swiftly bring additional forces to bear, this could conceivably put the city of Izium into play from the north. Even if they can, this assault has effectively reordered the situation in OpComEast already.
12/
Going forward: the butchers bill for Russian forces from this operation is unlikely to be low in either man or materiel, neither of which they can afford. UAF losses are likely to be substantial, but less than would be expected given the swift collapse of RU forward units.
13/
If the UAF can keep them on their heels until their own planned halt points are reached, it will climb higher. The danger for the UAF will be overextension. They will be tempted to continue on once reaching their own pre-planned stop lines, given RU performance.
14/
This must be resisted. The UAF will need time to reorganize, refit, consolidate its lines of supply & communication, deal with rear-area holdouts, & then ready itself for a fresh offensive. Given its performance to date, I am optimistic this concern will be heeded.
15/
In the back of every good analyst's mind for 7 months has been at least one question: "What will Ukraine look like on offense?"

We're finding out. They're giving us all a hell of a show on their 1st time out.
16/16
Addition: This is almost moving faster than I can write it. There are now (thank you to those who directed me to them) reports that UAF units are hitting Izium from the south with heavy fighting within the city limits. The entire tenor of the war in the east has changed.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Patrick Fox

Patrick Fox Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @RealCynicalFox

Sep 30, 2023
The current Congressional drama over funding the US govt is (in part) now hinging on Ukraine aid. @POTUS made it easy for the aid skeptics to make good on their promises.

If I saw this coming, the man with half a century in politics should have. 1/
apnews.com/article/russia…
The question then becomes, "What could the President have done about it?" The answer is quite a bit. The baseline truth is that some members of the GOP are unreachable on this issue for various reasons. The only thing to do in their case is to make it more politically dangerous to oppose aid than it currently is.

Other Republicans have what they believe are legitimate concerns that could have been addressed. At the very least there are measures that would have removed arguments in their favor and (likely) have rallied flagging public support.
2/
The easiest from @POTUS 's POV is to articulate a plan. Making a frequent, consistent, and transparent case to both Congress and the American public about why support for Ukraine is important for US national security is something Joe Biden has failed abysmally to do. A rambling speech every month or so that also covers other topics doesn't cut it. Post War on Terror the public needs a hell of a lot more leadership than that to garner their continued support for such an undertaking.

The President needs to consistently articulate a strategic objective in US interests that would be achieved by sending Ukraine military aid in its current war. "As long as it takes" is a platitude, not a plan. He must make the citizenry (and by extension their elected representatives) understand why this is a sound move. This must be done regularly, the American public has a great deal to contend with and focus is easy to lose.

He has to make an argument for this course of action, not simply belittle anyone who disagrees as a stooge of Putin. He has to lead.

Joint sessions of Congress to explain desired aid packages, timelines of delivery, their intended effect, the course and status of the war, and the best estimates of future needs would go a long way to dispelling the argument that what is being asked for is a blank check to be thrown away in Eastern Europe and that the administration is avoiding transparency.
3/
Read 9 tweets
Jan 31, 2023
🧵:
Just heard @benshapiro say the following, “Ukraine should apply for NATO membership, gain NATO membership, and then lines should be drawn and that’s it.” Meaning accommodation should be reached with Russia to end the war with a Ukraine newly backed (officially) by NATO.
1/
He was agreeing with similar comments by H. Kissinger. Sounds great in theory right? Here’s why it’s not going to happen. NATO requires unanimous consent from existing members to add new parties to the alliance. Germany & Hungary will be hard “No”.
2/

Turkey would also likely oppose the vote. In all likelihood they would not be the lone 3 opposition votes either. B/c as soon as Ukraine is a NATO member, it can invoke Art. 5 & call on the entire alliance to go to war with Russia, in order to eject foreign troops from...
3/
Read 5 tweets
Jan 31, 2023
🧵:
This is not uncommon in nations waging conventional wars for survival while desperately short of personnel. The article mentions the USSR specifically, while Israel is another good example.
1/
I'll be interested to see the breakdown of job assignments for the 38,000 women in UAF uniform, whether they're serving in segregated (doubtful, I've seen no mention of this) or mixed gender units, and the post-war analysis of their performance.
2/
The American & (as far as I am aware) Israeli experience has been that all female & mixed gender ground combat units do not perform as well as their all male counterparts. See the 2014-15 USMC Ground Combat Element Integrated Task Force study for specific criteria/issues.
3/
Read 4 tweets
Jan 29, 2023
Worth the read to understand the argument being made by @scharap & @MirandaPriebe. The premise is solid, war materiel consumption in the RU-UA War is predictably massive & western stockpiles are being steadily drained.
1/

rand.org/pubs/perspecti…
@scharap @MirandaPriebe H/e given the positions of both leaders involved, I disagree that anything short of major military defeat or the attainment of stated objectives could currently compel meaningful negotiations. Loss or change of either nations current leadership might also alter the situation.
2/
@scharap @MirandaPriebe Nor do I think either side has any interest in a "neutral Ukraine". Russia effectively had achieved this pre-war, & post-invasion Ukraine has shown little interest in returning to a state where it has few allies or western ties to call on in case of renewed attack by Russia.
3/
Read 7 tweets
Jan 24, 2023
Scholz und Panzers🧵:
Chancellor Scholz has once again prevaricated on the decision whether to authorize Leopard 2 transfers to Ukraine from Germany's various client states. While there are likely several reasons for this, I'd like to briefly delve into one of them here.
1/
My assessment of his behavior is that Scholz still harbors dreams of returning to something approaching a pre-war status quo between Russia & Germany. He's caught between this desire, & growing internal/external pressure to provide increasing levels of aid to Ukraine.
2/
Therefore Scholz continually attempts to thread the needle between the two. Aid is forthcoming, but not in relatively large quantities for a nation like Germany, nor is it sent with great alacrity. Increases happen only under pressure, & when Germany can delay - she does.
3/
Read 8 tweets
Jan 7, 2023
Short 🧵:
While this headline comes from more of the usual, and often denigrated by me, unfounded speculation by anonymous officials - I'm still going to use it to make a point about introducing western systems to the UAF.
1/

politico.com/news/2023/01/0…
I have no issue sending older M2 variant IFVs to the UAF. It should have been prepped for 8-9 months ago when it became clear the UAF wasn't going to fold and let the Russians overrun the country. Ditto air defense systems, & older generations of western warplanes.
2/
It wasn't prepped for, now this is all being done haphazardly & on the fly. These systems need lengthy logistics chains to keep them operational in sustained conventional combat. Think back to the columns stretching tens of miles behind advancing US formations going into Iraq.
3/
Read 12 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(