Ryan Hisner Profile picture
Sep 11, 2022 29 tweets 12 min read Read on X
BA.2, driven to near-zero levels by BA.5, still haunt us, spawning monstrous viruses that, after vanishing for months, burst forth, gnarled & hideous, in novel antibody armor. The latest, which I found skulking around India, has 13 spike mutations. 1/28 github.com/cov-lineages/p…
There have been just 4 sequences so far, but they’ve been in Indian cities roughly 800-1300 km apart from each other. Spike mutations consist of three deletions + 10 amino acid substitutions, two of which (K478T & R493Q) are reversions. 2/28 ImageImage
Most of these mutations are familiar, & known for their antibody-evading properties. The most unique are the K478T reversion & R1091H, an uncommon S2 mutation. But in this thread, I want to discuss the three new deletions, all in the amino-terminal domain (NTD). 3/28 Image
Most of the info in this thread is from 3 superb studies: 1 by @EnyaQing & co, 1 by @GuptaR_lab, & 1 by @GroveLab. Links below. 4/28 cell.com/cell-reports/f… journals.asm.org/doi/10.1128/mB… embopress.org/doi/full/10.15…
The NTD, at spike-protein amino acid (AA) sites 14-306, is possibly the most variable region in the SARS-CoV-2 genome, but the reasons for NTD mutations are usually less clear than for the receptor-binding domain (RBD, sites 331-528). 5/28 Image
The RBD binds the ACE2 receptor on human cells & is the primary target of neutralizing antibodies, & most mutations there can be attributed to the effect they have on ACE2 affinity and/or antibody evasion. 6/28
The NTD is, to a lesser extent, also targeted by antibodies, primarily at the NTD antigenic supersite. The NTD contains five loops that extend outward, known as N1, N2, N3, N4, & N5. Loops N1, N3, & N5 largely form the NTD supersite. 7/28
At precisely what amino acid sites are these NTD loops located?
• N1 Loop—14-26
• N2 Loop—67-81
• N3 Loop—140-158
• N4 Loop—174-188
• N5 Loop—241-263
embopress.org/doi/full/10.15…
8/28 Image
As described below, SARS-CoV-2’s NTD loops are long compared to those of other sarbecoviruses, especially N2, N3, & N5. It is precisely at these loops that we see the vast majority of NTD deletions in SARS-CoV-2. 9/28
NTD deletions, by shortening the length of these projecting loops, can help SARS-CoV-2 evade antibodies, a fact first proven by @mccarthy_kr. He showed this, impressively, before any VOC with deletions had yet emerged. 10/28
science.org/doi/10.1126/sc… Image
But there is more to these NTD deletions than just immune evasion. The most common deletion has been ∆69-70—found in Alpha, BA.1, BA.4/5, & others—and it plays little to no role in immune evasion. 11/28 Image
Variations in NTD-loop length through deletions & insertions turn out to be common in other sarbecoviruses, suggesting their broad utility at facilitating evolutionary change, possibly by compensating for changes caused by mutations elsewhere. 12/28 Image
For example, @GuptaR_lab found that ∆69-70 usually accompanied RBD mutations (like N439K &Y453F) that strengthen ACE2 binding and/or evade immunity but which also reduce viral infectivity. 13/28 Image
∆69-70, inserted into pseudoviruses, increased infectivity & when H69/V70 residues were re-inserted back into Alpha, cell entry, S1/S2 spike cleavage (an essential step in entry), & ability to fuse cells (form syncytia) were all greatly impaired. 14/28 ImageImage
More generally, deletions that shorten NTD loops appear to greatly increase the ability of SARS-CoV-2 to fuse with cell membranes, infect cells, and fuse cells together. 15/28 Image
SARS1 has much shorter NTD loops than SARS2. @EnyaQing found that replacing the SARS2 NTD with the SARS1 NTD in virus-like particles (VLP) enormously increases its ability to fuse with cell membranes and infect cells. 16/28 Image
Similar results were found by @GroveLab when replacing SARS-CoV-2’s NTD with that of Pangolin CoV, which has very short NTD loops. 17/28 Image
By exposing VLP’s to dissolved ACE2 receptors, one can determine the degree to which RBDs are in the exposed “up” position, which is necessary for binding ACE2. The more a VLP is inhibited from fusing w/cell-like particles by dissolved ACE2, the greater the RBD exposure. 18/28 Image
It turns out that by this measure, SARS-CoV-1 NTD—which, again, has much shorter NTD loops than SARS-CoV-2 & is therefore a good proxy for SARS-CoV-2 viruses bearing many deletions—enhances RBD exposure. 19/28 Image
So if shorter NTD loops improves cell entry, fusion with cell membranes, the ability to fuse cells together (syncytia formation), and RBD exposure, why don’t all SARS-CoV-2 have large deletions, shortening their NTD loops? 20/28
NTD deletions must exact a cost, & that cost is spike-protein instability. Putting the SARS2+SARS1-NTD VLP’s through a mildly stressful procedure resulted in the loss of the S1 portion of spike, destroying cell entry & fusion capability. 21/28 Image
So NTD deletions often confer antibody-evading powers and can powerfully increase a virus’s ability to infect cells and fuse cells together, but this comes at the cost of spike instability, leaving it vulnerable to permanent inactivation. 22/28 Image
What determines whether a given NTD deletion will be deleterious or advantageous? The environment of course, most powerfully, the spike protein background. “The impact of NTD hypervariability depends on the S protein background.” 23/28 Image
In fact, it was only after the D614G mutation stabilized spike that NTD deletions became possible. The authors of this study—which is impossible to do justice to here—issued an ominous & prescient warning (written in May 2021, before Delta’s properties were known). 24/28
“That a genetic drift around metastable set points can potentially generate hyper-fusogenic CoVs with enhanced cell entry potential is an important consideration in understanding CoV cell entry, transmission, & pathogenicity.” Indeed. 25/28 Image
Will this particular BA.2 monstrosity, or any of the others, turn out to be hyper-fusogenic, with Delta-like disease severity? My guess is not simply because they retain the Omicron S2, which seems to annihilate all fusogenicity. 26/28
But a reversion to greater fusogenicity, LRT tropism, & Delta-like disease severity seems extremely likely at some point. We would do well to acknowledge this & recognize the necessity of instituting serious NPIs when it happens. 27/28
As usual, I want to emphasize that I’m not an expert in these matters and have no formal credentials. It’s entirely possible I’ve misinterpreted something in this thread, and I welcome corrections and comments from all. 28/28
Finally, thank you to all the hard-working scientists throughout the world sequencing & uploading virus sequences, without which surveillance would be impossible—@r_karyakarte, for example. And thanks to @GISAID for organizing & storing these sequences so they can be monitored.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Ryan Hisner

Ryan Hisner Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @LongDesertTrain

Sep 26
Attenuation of the SARS-2 furin-cleavage site (FCS) continues apace. It's beginning to look as if some form of FCS-weakening mutation might well become fixed in the near future. Collectively, they are at ~12% globally—a totally unprecedented level—& rising quickly. 1/4 Image
In South America, this may have already happened. Recent sequences are scarce, but they nearly all have some sort of FCS-weakening mutation, mostly S:S680P in XFG.3.4.1, but with several others (S680F, S680Y, R683Q, R683W) contributing as well. 2/4 Image
The enigmatic anti-correlation between S:∆S31 & FCS ablaters—clear since summer 2024—is strong as ever. Here are the recent CovSpectrum stats for T22N & ∆S31 among all seqs & seqs w/FCS weakeners.

How exactly a 1-AA deletion in a distant region affects the FCS is unknown. 3/4 Image
Read 4 tweets
Sep 4
There's been some speculation about why, despite persistent immune activation, germinal center activity, & overall elevated Ab levels, LC patients here had very low anti-spike Ab titers. I want to highlight one interesting speculative hypothesis & offer another possibility. 1/10
The ever-fertile mind of @Nucleocapsoid proffers the possibility that exosomes could be responsible for viral spread in some tissue reservoirs. I don't know much about this topic and so don't have much to say at the moment, but I'm trying to l learn. 2/
I'll offer one other possibility: the deep lung environment (or some other tissue reservoir) favors either an extreme RBD-up or extreme RBD-down conformation.

Background: The receptor-binding domain (RBD) of the spike trimer can be up or down. It has to be up to bind ACE2... 3/ Image
Read 10 tweets
Sep 2
A fascinating new preprint w/one very unexpected finding suggests, I believe, that a large proportion of Long Covid may be due to chronic infection in a particular bodily niche, which could be crucial for finding effective LC treatments. It requires some explaining. 🧵 1/33 Image
First, a brief summary of the relevant parts of the preprint. They examined 30 people (from NIH RECOVER cohort) for 6 months after they had Covid, taking detailed blood immunological markers at 3 time points. 20 had Long Covid (PASC), 10 did not (CONV). 2/ biorxiv.org/content/10.110…Image
The PASC group showed signs of persistent, pro-inflammatory immune activation over the 6-month time period that suggested ongoing mucosal immune responses, including elevated levels of mucosa-associated invariant T cells (MAIT). 3/ Image
Read 33 tweets
Jul 30
Wow, BA.3.2 hits its 4th continent with a new sequence from Western Australia.

Reminder: BA.3.2 is a saltation variant resulting from a ~3-year chronic infection. It is very different from and more immune-evasive than all other current variants. 1/4 Image
It was collected July 15, & is most closely related to the recent S African seqs from May & June.

It has an NSP5 mutation known to be beneficial (ORF1a:K3353R) & 2 new NSP12 mutations, which is unusual. Its 9 synonymous mutations indicate it has been circulating somewhere. 2/4 Image
Seems clear now that BA.3.2 is not going away anytime soon. Its overall impact so far has been negligible, but at first BA.2.86's was as well. Once it got S:L455S (becoming JN.1) the dam burst & it set off a new wave in the global North. The question now is.... 3/4 Image
Read 4 tweets
Jul 7
BA.3.2 update: another sequence from the Netherlands, June 18 collection.

It belongs on the same branch as the GBW travel seq (tree gets confused by ORF7-8 deletion). Also, there are 3 artifactual muts in the GBW sequence (as usual), so the branch is shorter than it looks. Image
Bottom line, in my view: BA.3.2 has spread internationally & is likely growing, but very slowly. If nothing changes, its advantage vs circulating lineages, which seem stuck in an evolutionary rut, will likely gradually grow as immunity to dominant variants solidifies... 2/9
So far, this seems like a slow-motion version of what we saw with BA.2.86, which spread internationally & grew very slowly for months. But then it got S:L455S & exploded, wiping out all competitors. Will something similar happen with BA.3.2? I think there's a good chance... 3/9 Image
Read 9 tweets
Jul 2
Quick BA.3.2 update. Another BA.3.2.2 (S:K356T+S:A575S branch) from South Africa via pneumonia surveillance.

This means that 40% of SARS-CoV-2 sequences from SA collected since April 1 (2/5) and 50% collected after May 1 (1/2) are BA.3.2. Its foothold seems strong there. 1/3
2 interesting aspects of the new BA.3.2:
1. ORF1b:R1315C (NSP13_R392C)—This mut is in all Omicron *except* BA.3. So this may well be adaptive.

2. S:Q183H—First known antigenic spike mut seen in BA.3.2, not a major one, but one we've seen before—eg, LB.1/JN.1.9.2.1 2/3 Image
I think the unusually long branches in the BA.3.2 tree indicate 2 things:
1. Slow growth globally—fast growth results in many identical sequences, if surveillance is sufficient

2. Undersampling—BA.3.2 most common in poorer world regions with little sequencing of late. 3/3
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(