Ryan Hisner Profile picture
Sep 11, 2022 29 tweets 12 min read Read on X
BA.2, driven to near-zero levels by BA.5, still haunt us, spawning monstrous viruses that, after vanishing for months, burst forth, gnarled & hideous, in novel antibody armor. The latest, which I found skulking around India, has 13 spike mutations. 1/28 github.com/cov-lineages/p…
There have been just 4 sequences so far, but they’ve been in Indian cities roughly 800-1300 km apart from each other. Spike mutations consist of three deletions + 10 amino acid substitutions, two of which (K478T & R493Q) are reversions. 2/28 ImageImage
Most of these mutations are familiar, & known for their antibody-evading properties. The most unique are the K478T reversion & R1091H, an uncommon S2 mutation. But in this thread, I want to discuss the three new deletions, all in the amino-terminal domain (NTD). 3/28 Image
Most of the info in this thread is from 3 superb studies: 1 by @EnyaQing & co, 1 by @GuptaR_lab, & 1 by @GroveLab. Links below. 4/28 cell.com/cell-reports/f… journals.asm.org/doi/10.1128/mB… embopress.org/doi/full/10.15…
The NTD, at spike-protein amino acid (AA) sites 14-306, is possibly the most variable region in the SARS-CoV-2 genome, but the reasons for NTD mutations are usually less clear than for the receptor-binding domain (RBD, sites 331-528). 5/28 Image
The RBD binds the ACE2 receptor on human cells & is the primary target of neutralizing antibodies, & most mutations there can be attributed to the effect they have on ACE2 affinity and/or antibody evasion. 6/28
The NTD is, to a lesser extent, also targeted by antibodies, primarily at the NTD antigenic supersite. The NTD contains five loops that extend outward, known as N1, N2, N3, N4, & N5. Loops N1, N3, & N5 largely form the NTD supersite. 7/28
At precisely what amino acid sites are these NTD loops located?
• N1 Loop—14-26
• N2 Loop—67-81
• N3 Loop—140-158
• N4 Loop—174-188
• N5 Loop—241-263
embopress.org/doi/full/10.15…
8/28 Image
As described below, SARS-CoV-2’s NTD loops are long compared to those of other sarbecoviruses, especially N2, N3, & N5. It is precisely at these loops that we see the vast majority of NTD deletions in SARS-CoV-2. 9/28
NTD deletions, by shortening the length of these projecting loops, can help SARS-CoV-2 evade antibodies, a fact first proven by @mccarthy_kr. He showed this, impressively, before any VOC with deletions had yet emerged. 10/28
science.org/doi/10.1126/sc… Image
But there is more to these NTD deletions than just immune evasion. The most common deletion has been ∆69-70—found in Alpha, BA.1, BA.4/5, & others—and it plays little to no role in immune evasion. 11/28 Image
Variations in NTD-loop length through deletions & insertions turn out to be common in other sarbecoviruses, suggesting their broad utility at facilitating evolutionary change, possibly by compensating for changes caused by mutations elsewhere. 12/28 Image
For example, @GuptaR_lab found that ∆69-70 usually accompanied RBD mutations (like N439K &Y453F) that strengthen ACE2 binding and/or evade immunity but which also reduce viral infectivity. 13/28 Image
∆69-70, inserted into pseudoviruses, increased infectivity & when H69/V70 residues were re-inserted back into Alpha, cell entry, S1/S2 spike cleavage (an essential step in entry), & ability to fuse cells (form syncytia) were all greatly impaired. 14/28 ImageImage
More generally, deletions that shorten NTD loops appear to greatly increase the ability of SARS-CoV-2 to fuse with cell membranes, infect cells, and fuse cells together. 15/28 Image
SARS1 has much shorter NTD loops than SARS2. @EnyaQing found that replacing the SARS2 NTD with the SARS1 NTD in virus-like particles (VLP) enormously increases its ability to fuse with cell membranes and infect cells. 16/28 Image
Similar results were found by @GroveLab when replacing SARS-CoV-2’s NTD with that of Pangolin CoV, which has very short NTD loops. 17/28 Image
By exposing VLP’s to dissolved ACE2 receptors, one can determine the degree to which RBDs are in the exposed “up” position, which is necessary for binding ACE2. The more a VLP is inhibited from fusing w/cell-like particles by dissolved ACE2, the greater the RBD exposure. 18/28 Image
It turns out that by this measure, SARS-CoV-1 NTD—which, again, has much shorter NTD loops than SARS-CoV-2 & is therefore a good proxy for SARS-CoV-2 viruses bearing many deletions—enhances RBD exposure. 19/28 Image
So if shorter NTD loops improves cell entry, fusion with cell membranes, the ability to fuse cells together (syncytia formation), and RBD exposure, why don’t all SARS-CoV-2 have large deletions, shortening their NTD loops? 20/28
NTD deletions must exact a cost, & that cost is spike-protein instability. Putting the SARS2+SARS1-NTD VLP’s through a mildly stressful procedure resulted in the loss of the S1 portion of spike, destroying cell entry & fusion capability. 21/28 Image
So NTD deletions often confer antibody-evading powers and can powerfully increase a virus’s ability to infect cells and fuse cells together, but this comes at the cost of spike instability, leaving it vulnerable to permanent inactivation. 22/28 Image
What determines whether a given NTD deletion will be deleterious or advantageous? The environment of course, most powerfully, the spike protein background. “The impact of NTD hypervariability depends on the S protein background.” 23/28 Image
In fact, it was only after the D614G mutation stabilized spike that NTD deletions became possible. The authors of this study—which is impossible to do justice to here—issued an ominous & prescient warning (written in May 2021, before Delta’s properties were known). 24/28
“That a genetic drift around metastable set points can potentially generate hyper-fusogenic CoVs with enhanced cell entry potential is an important consideration in understanding CoV cell entry, transmission, & pathogenicity.” Indeed. 25/28 Image
Will this particular BA.2 monstrosity, or any of the others, turn out to be hyper-fusogenic, with Delta-like disease severity? My guess is not simply because they retain the Omicron S2, which seems to annihilate all fusogenicity. 26/28
But a reversion to greater fusogenicity, LRT tropism, & Delta-like disease severity seems extremely likely at some point. We would do well to acknowledge this & recognize the necessity of instituting serious NPIs when it happens. 27/28
As usual, I want to emphasize that I’m not an expert in these matters and have no formal credentials. It’s entirely possible I’ve misinterpreted something in this thread, and I welcome corrections and comments from all. 28/28
Finally, thank you to all the hard-working scientists throughout the world sequencing & uploading virus sequences, without which surveillance would be impossible—@r_karyakarte, for example. And thanks to @GISAID for organizing & storing these sequences so they can be monitored.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Ryan Hisner

Ryan Hisner Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @LongDesertTrain

Mar 26
So it's clear that BA.3.2 preferentially infects children, something we have never seen before in a SARS-CoV-2 variant.

Why?

The question's baffled me, but after a suggestion from Darren Martin, I think I have an explanation that makes sense.
1/16
I've tried to make sense of BA.3.2's penchant for kids by considering its unique spike: more compact, more closed, & more antibody-evasive than any other variant.

But I think another feature of BA.3.2 is responsible: its wholesale deletion of ORF7a, ORF7b, & ORF8 (∆ORF78).
2/
∆ORF78 is rare but not unheard of; it was in several late XBB variants (GW.5.1.1, FW.1.1, GE.1.2, etc) & a few branches of other variants. I've long thought these late XBB had an advantage in some population subsector, but I didn't suspect kids.
3/
Read 18 tweets
Mar 24
You have to wonder for how long we will continue seeing infections from 2020 continue to show up (in absurdly high quantities) in wastewater.
1/16
I suspect that the number of people continuously infected since 2020 or 2021 is much larger than we realize. It's impossible to prove, but there are case studies where a chronically infected person gets infected by a new variant, which drives out the original virus...
2/16
...which consequently leaves no trace that the person was chronically infected before the super-infecting variant—took over.

Why then are some Cryptic WW variants resistant to being outcompeted by newer variants?
3/16
Read 16 tweets
Mar 22
While the final outcome for BA.3.2 is uncertain, its unique characteristics—extensively remodeled spike NTD & SD1/SD2, novel S2 muts, & total deletion of ORF7a/7b/8—make it the best candidate for co-dominance we've seen, which could mark a new era in SARS-2 evolution. 1/
Until now, the broad pattern of SARS-2 evolution has been:

1) Emergence of a saltation variant originating in a chronic infection

2) Rapid growth/global dominance & a variant-driven wave of infection—especially if it emerges in late fall/winter (BA.1, XBB.1.5, JN.1). 2/
3) Stepwise evolution over the next few months/years, usually without driving major waves (the JN.1-descended KP.3.1.1 being a notable exception).

4) Repeat

3/
Read 34 tweets
Dec 29, 2025
Very proud to be a co-author on this comprehensive preprint on the novel, growing saltation lineage BA.3.2, together with @Tuliodna, Darren Martin, Dikeledi Kekana, and lead author @graemedor. 1/9
I would normally write a summary 🧵 of the BA.3.2 mutational analysis here, but as much of my contribution parallels my previous BA.3.2 threads I'll just link to those here, w/brief descriptions of each.

This is my first, big-picture BA.3.2 🧵. 2/9
Short thread from June when the first travel BA.3.2 sequences showed up. I think my prediction from back then has pretty much been borne out. 3/9
Read 9 tweets
Dec 24, 2025
BA.3.2 emerged in Nov 2024 after ~3 years of intrahost evolution with >50 new spike AA muts, but since then, it's changed very little. Could the drug molnupiravir (MOV) galvanize BA.3.2 into pursuing new evolutionary paths? A new 89-mut MOV BA.3.2 seq suggests it could. 1/11 Image
Background on MOV: It's a mutagenic drug. Its purpose is to cause so many mutations that the virus becomes unviable & is cleared. But we've long known this often does not happen. Instead, the virus persists in highly mutated form & can be transmitted. 2/
I was an author on a paper published in @Nature that conclusively showed not only that MOV has created highly mutated, persistent viruses, but that these viruses have transmitted numerous times. See 🧵 below by lead author @theosanderson. 3/
Read 11 tweets
Dec 22, 2025
The most valuable viral research tools—@nextstrain & CovSpectrum—are being destroyed, not only blocked from new data but now forbidden from even sharing info from the PAST. Why?

Because GISAID is run dictatorially by a con man, paranoid egomaniac, & liar named Peter Bogner. 1/
I use CovSpectrum & Nextstrain every day—& I'm not the only one. Every Covid thread I've ever posted here has relied partly on CovSpectrum & Nextstrain for information & visuals. These vital tools have now been stolen from us by a world-class grifter. 2/ thinkglobalhealth.org/article/to-fin…Image
For years scientists knew something was very, very wrong with GISAID, but the breakout story (from which much of this 🧵is based) came 2 years ago in @ScienceMagazine from @sciencecohen & Martin Enserik. 3/
science.org/content/articl…
Read 22 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(