2/ Note Durham going w/ FBI received Steele reporting in or about July 2016.
3/ LOL. To this day, I STILL see Leftist claiming the dossier was mostly true/corroborated or some such nonsense.
4/ It is truly crazy that our "free press" continues to frame Trump as coordinating with Russians when in fact, Clinton campaign HIRED Russian who provided disinformation re Trump that allowed spying on Trump campaign. And, yes, you are getting my live thought bubbles as I read.
5/ Holy crap! This is dirty CHS #4 at least, adding to Steele, Halper, and Joffe, which I detailed here. thefederalist.com/2022/07/21/jus…
6/ I need to just pause for a scream now: OUR FRICKIN' GOVERNMENT PAID FOR RUSSIAN DISINFORMATION.
7/ Oh, and yeah, more Russia connections of the Clinton Campaign, but let's instead target Trump.
9/ So weird that Crossfire Hurricane hadn't run this angle down within hours of getting Steele's report. My gosh Putin must think America's IC is Maxwell Smart.
10/ Again, Clinton Campaign not Trump was flush with Russia connections.
11/ Read this an pause for a second to consider how surreal this is. Hillary Clinton paid to spread this sh!t about Donald Trump making this a "normal" part of our conversation.
12/ This section of the brief REALLY caught my eye. Why? Read the entire section and then...
13/ Steele going on holiday in the midst of this huge assignment always struck me as strange and Cyprus, where @GeorgePapa19 was targeted and where Alfa Bank owner (I believe) was from seemed soooo strange, but now consider Dolan & his connections & timing.
14/ Dang, now I want to re-read all of FBI & Steele's reporting to see where they pulled this trick!
15/ context to @SergeiMillian tweets: And frankly I don't blame him for not trusting FBI. Would you want to risk being arrested by Biden's men in black?
16/So Durham's going with Steele incorrectly believed and not deceived.
17/ OMgosh....They ARE Maxwell Smart! And they asked him to be a CHS.
18/ SO Clinton paid a Russian agent for dirt on Trump is take-away!
19/19 So in sum, new info of significance: 1) Danchenko CHS 2) @SergeiMillian not testifying 3) Hillary is the Russia, Russia, Russia connected on 4) And CYPRUS thread has potential to be huge.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
🚨Judge just entered clarifying order in case of 2 year old American. Judge's clarification provides helpful context: In short, Judge sees factual dispute concerning whether mom wanted to take 2 year old or not & that is the Court's concern. 1/
2/ (Sorry got pulled away): Judge's comments & order make much more sense now AND if a legitimate habeas case, Judge seeking to make factual determination would be appropriate, although mom's letter has not been called into question by any of evidence.
3/ Problem though is this is not legitimate habeas case because Plaintiff lacks authority to act on behalf of child because there is no evidence dad has any authority to act on behalf of the child. Under Louisiana law, mom has all parental rights if dad & mom weren't married.
🔥My thoughts below were stream of conscious but after processing, I think it is a huge "discovery" I noted: In short, attorney originally referred to father of 2 year old as husband of mother but in court documents only called him "partner." 1/
2/ Under Louisiana law, if parents are NOT married at time of birth, then mother has all custodial and parental rights. Dad has to prove fatherhood (here proven by birth certificate) AND then obtain legal custodial/parental rights via court proceedings.
3/ So, if they weren't married as seems likely given court documents did not refer to him as husband, it seems very unlikely dad had any legal parental or custodial rights to 2 year old which would mean he couldn't give them to a Provisional Custodian.
Few additional points: Mother was in "custody" but ICE wasn't holding custody of 2 year old, but rather allowed mother to keep her 2 year old with her in the hotel in which was staying pending deportation. 1/
"2/ Second, the father is never referred to as the "husband" in the court filings and instead is referred to as the mother's "partner." That matters because LA statute speaks of either parent having "parental authority" during marriage.
3/ Now, I haven't researched scenario of non-marriage parental authority in LA, but ICE knows mom has parental authority. And nothing provided to ICE indicated dad had any parental authority & as such couldn't transfer it to 3d party.
🚨🚨🚨District court entered injunction barring Trump Administration from taking steps to implement president's determination that unions no longer represent certain employees based on federal statute Trump invoked: 1/
🚨Yet another effort to interfere in Trump Administration's management of agencies filed today regarding DHS's terminations of employees. Lawsuit filed by three organizations seeks, among other things: 1/