2/ Note Durham going w/ FBI received Steele reporting in or about July 2016.
3/ LOL. To this day, I STILL see Leftist claiming the dossier was mostly true/corroborated or some such nonsense.
4/ It is truly crazy that our "free press" continues to frame Trump as coordinating with Russians when in fact, Clinton campaign HIRED Russian who provided disinformation re Trump that allowed spying on Trump campaign. And, yes, you are getting my live thought bubbles as I read.
5/ Holy crap! This is dirty CHS #4 at least, adding to Steele, Halper, and Joffe, which I detailed here. thefederalist.com/2022/07/21/jus…
6/ I need to just pause for a scream now: OUR FRICKIN' GOVERNMENT PAID FOR RUSSIAN DISINFORMATION.
7/ Oh, and yeah, more Russia connections of the Clinton Campaign, but let's instead target Trump.
9/ So weird that Crossfire Hurricane hadn't run this angle down within hours of getting Steele's report. My gosh Putin must think America's IC is Maxwell Smart.
10/ Again, Clinton Campaign not Trump was flush with Russia connections.
11/ Read this an pause for a second to consider how surreal this is. Hillary Clinton paid to spread this sh!t about Donald Trump making this a "normal" part of our conversation.
12/ This section of the brief REALLY caught my eye. Why? Read the entire section and then...
13/ Steele going on holiday in the midst of this huge assignment always struck me as strange and Cyprus, where @GeorgePapa19 was targeted and where Alfa Bank owner (I believe) was from seemed soooo strange, but now consider Dolan & his connections & timing.
14/ Dang, now I want to re-read all of FBI & Steele's reporting to see where they pulled this trick!
15/ context to @SergeiMillian tweets: And frankly I don't blame him for not trusting FBI. Would you want to risk being arrested by Biden's men in black?
16/So Durham's going with Steele incorrectly believed and not deceived.
17/ OMgosh....They ARE Maxwell Smart! And they asked him to be a CHS.
18/ SO Clinton paid a Russian agent for dirt on Trump is take-away!
19/19 So in sum, new info of significance: 1) Danchenko CHS 2) @SergeiMillian not testifying 3) Hillary is the Russia, Russia, Russia connected on 4) And CYPRUS thread has potential to be huge.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
EXCLUSIVE: Never-before published Yota-cell phone white paper pales in comparison to CIA notes memorializing what Sussmann told CIA on behalf of Joffe AND confirms Joffe shared confidential Executive Office Of President with Ga Tech researcher. @FDRLSTthefederalist.com/2022/09/15/exc…
2/ Scibd link says it was removed. Working on getting back up but until then, here are screen grabs:
THREAD: Trump's brief in opposition to the Motion for Stay helps frame what I see as THE key question. (Assuming there was no obstruction, which given DOJ's leaks I think is far assumption.) 1/
2/ This excerpt to me is KEY because it highlight two different kind of records: those falling under the Presidential Records Act and those falling under the Federal Records Act. Documents fit ONE or the other Category.
3/ Presidential Records are specifically defined as follows and excludes BOTH "personal records" AND "official records of an agency."
3/ If Presidential Records, Trump has right to access them, which I stressed long ago noting if concern was where they were kept NARA should have worked with Trump as it did with Obama to establish library repository.
BREAKING: Trump/Biden files response. Interesting point here--seizing personal items not commingled was within search warrant. YES because not particular! 1/
2/ Proposed Special Masters
3/ This is interesting because many documents will not be "presidential records" such as declassified documents (marked as such), so is Trump saying those are "personal documents"/not privileged,i.e., his personal copy?
THREAD on Danchenko's Motion to Dismiss. In short, he argues his ambiguous, subjective statements cannot form basis of false statements charge. Read-tweeting so will do summary at end, but for now clipping & commenting as I go.
2/ Will be interesting to see what Durham does with this statement of "fact" since he disagrees with this.
THREADETTE: I remain convinced there is NO WAY Trump's legal team, KNOWING his enemies have been trying to pin crime on him for 6 years would hand them perjury/obstruction. So who would tell lawyer who signed certification these are all responsive docs, given reality 1/
2/ that classified documents were recovered? Someone who had performed what they believed was "diligent search" & not discovered the documents. Remember: NARA spoke of docs being intermixed w/ other records & in boxes with lots of misc. stuff. Pictures released of classified
3/ envelops was AFTER 9 hours of searching by huge FBI team. And remember GSA & not Trump packed boxes. What seems more likely: Trump's folks blatantly lied knowing Biden Admin. was after him w/ subpoena & deep state was for 6 years or that whomever did the search