Seth Abramson Profile picture
Sep 15 22 tweets 5 min read
(🔐) BREAKING NEWS: DOJ Investigating Ties Between the FBI and the Kremlin Agent Behind 2016 Trump-Russia Collusion; Jared Kushner May Also Be Implicated

This relates to everything I wrote about in the NYT bestselling Proof trilogy. I hope you’ll RETWEET. sethabramson.substack.com/p/breaking-new…
1/ I don’t think I’ve ever started a PROOF report with a disclaimer like this one has. I had to clarify that the issues in play here are so complicated they were the subject of 2,500 pages of bestselling nonfiction (with 10,000+ major-media citations). So this is all streamlined.
2/ IOW I’m earnestly trying to make this digestible—summarizing in a few thousand words a story that’s already taken many hundreds of thousands of published words to unpack. The main thing is to underscore why Kushner, Deripaska, the NYC FBI field office, and Brookfield *matter*.
3/ None of this is idle talk. This report covers a DOJ investigation—and a series of complex financial transactions that’ve been the subject of hundreds of major-media reports and at least one running investigative timeline at the nation’s top NatSec media outlet (Just Security).
4/ I can’t summarize this news, so I’ll do the next-best thing: summarize its backdrop. First, understand that Paul Manafort wasn’t leading Trump-Russia collusion for Trump, as he was employed at the time by the man running Trump-Russia collusion for the *Kremlin*—Oleg Deripaska.
5/ Nor was Cohen running Trump-Russia collusion. He was running Trump’s pursuit of the most lucrative deal of his life with the Kremlin—a secret course of negotiation he lied to voters about—for the entirety of his 2016 POTUS run.

*Kushner* ran Trump-Russia collusion for Trump.
6/ So understand that *any* news that links Kushner and Deripaska—let alone news like *this*, which also involves Deripaska’s co-lead on Trump-Russia collusion, the Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, *and* the unit of the FBI that helped Trump gain election in 2016—is historic.
7/ But this news... *this* news... is even more next-level, as it also implicates a series of financial transactions by Jared Kushner that have been at the heart of the Trump-Russia collusion investigation since (if you can believe it) the Steele Dossier dropped in January 2017.
8/ This thread won’t rehash the systematic disinformation the Right has spread about the Dossier, which at this point is 1/3rd accurate, 1/3 inaccurate, and 1/3 unproven—with the final third trending toward accurate (echoing Steele’s own 70%-accurate estimate for his raw intel).
9/ The most controversial claim in the Dossier was never the pee-tape claim, as (a) all the evidence suggests something uncouth 100% happened at the Ritz Moscow in November 2013, but (b) even if it did occur, it didn’t involve Trump having sex and wouldn’t really prove collusion.
10/ Rather, the most controversial claim in the Dossier was that Trump in some fashion stood to gain from the December 2016 sale of a portion of the Kremlin-owned oil giant Rosneft. I still have trolls who know nothing about the Trump-Russia scandal trolling me over this in 2022.
11/ Almost no one actually writes about the Rosneft deal component of Trump-Russia collusion because it is so damn confusing. And it is so damn confusing in part because of disinformation about it and in part because the identities of the buyers remained hidden for a long time.
12/ But it suffices to say the following: nothing in the Dossier ever said Trump was going to be paid directly from the deal, and it would have been moronic to interpret the Dossier’s raw, unprocessed intel that way. The idea was that Trump would financially benefit *indirectly*.
13/ IOW, one of the buyers of a portion of Rosneft would thereafter—and sometime soon, within a year or two—do a positively jaw-droppingly opaque deal with someone close to Trump that would in essence act as a transfer of funds to a location Trump could access/benefit from them.
14/ And that happened.

I don’t know what else to say. It *inarguably* happened.

And to this day, grotesque scoundrels like Nicholas Grossman of ArcDigi try to convince their readers that it never did—and for the life of me I’ve no idea why they’re committed to lying about this.
15/ In December 2016, the Qatari Investment Authority was a buyer in the Rosneft deal, and within a few months it had become a business partner... of Jared Kushner.

Then, in August 2018, it executed perhaps the biggest and most inexplicable bailout in U.S. history.

Of Kushner.
16/ I can’t articulate how much more complicated this is than I’ve made it here.

Proof of Conspiracy (Macmillan, 2019) is a 600-page book that devotes an entire chapter to just one component of this scandal: a Saudi blockade of Qatar that Trump and Kushner secretly orchestrated.
17/ But the upshot—for the purposes of this kinda-brief thread—is that a QIA-backed company called Brookfield gave Kushner a ten-figure bailout in August 2018, as the Kushners were about to lose everything on a historically bad deal the historically business-clueless Kushner did.
18/ And now we’ve learned that one of the leading FBI investigators of Kushner in 2016, 2017, and 2018 jumped to a lucrative position at Brookfield right as it bailed out Kushner—and while in that role seems to have coordinated with the Kremlin lead on 2016 collusion, Deripaska.
19/ It’s all *worse* than I just made it sound—but I think we can agree it’s horrific? This is the opposite of a Durham bombshell; rather than proof that the FBI was anti-Trump when it repeatedly did him solids from 2015 to 2018, this is evidence of possible pro-Trump misconduct.
20/ Hopefully this gives everyone a good sense of where this breaking news report at PROOF is headed, as well as the excellent work now being done by Insider that is mentioned in the subhed of the article and is linked to therein. See PROOF for the rest: sethabramson.substack.com
(PS) As ever, anyone who prefers to tip (in any amount) for threads here rather than subscribe ($5/mo or $50/yr) to the PROOF Substack can do so via my Venmo account, which is [@]SethAbramsonTwitter, or my PayPal, which can be found and easily accessed at sethabramson.net/pp.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Seth Abramson

Seth Abramson Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @SethAbramson

Sep 15
ATTENTION FBI: INVESTIGATE THIS MAN FOR HUMAN TRAFFICKING foxnews.com/politics/ron-d…
Keep in mind that Ron DeSantis will raise money off this decision/policy. So before you assume there is no human trafficking here, realize that the man is literally trafficking humans across state lines against their will for profit—doing so in knowing contravention of the law.
Read 5 tweets
Sep 14
(POLL) Do you believe Donald Trump has—financially speaking—a positive net worth?

{Note: This question is necessarily a matter of speculation rather than fact, as Trump hides his financial records when he can and brazenly lies to banks, courts, and federal agents when he can’t.}
(I should of course mention that Trump lies about his finances to media as well, indeed perhaps most of all.)
(I hope it goes without saying that the implications of a venal man with a *negative* net worth illegally holding a massive stock of state secrets are truly terrifying, indeed a clear and present danger to national security the likes of which we’ve never seen before in America.)
Read 4 tweets
Sep 13
We have our special master!

In a... uh... theft case... not involving attorney-client privilege or executive privilege or anything else special masters deal with...

{sigh}

This is all so goddamned stupid. businessinsider.com/who-is-raymond…
I earnestly admire those lawyers who are spending hours and hours analyzing the legal maneuvers in the Mar-a-Lago case. But I decided I couldn’t do it—because it’s all so stupid and farcical and pretextual and an insult to the rule of law and how {waves hands} all of this works.
I have worked *extremely* complicated criminal cases, from first-degree murders to armed robberies to felonious sexual assaults to financial crimes cases and other types of cases in which documents are at the center of everything.

And let me tell you what the Mar-a-Lago case is:
Read 21 tweets
Sep 12
I am trying to figure out why so many people are now speculating about the purpose behind Donald Trump’s visit to DC. What’s the point of guessing? If and when we have actual information on this, okay, but until then it feels like the speculation is a bit out of control, frankly.
I’m seeing many people saying he’s at Walter Reed with no evidence to support the claim. Others are saying he’s going to be arraigned tomorrow, but DOJ has implied it’ll take no such action pre-election. A search of a Trump DC property? Possibly—but no evidence of *that*, either.
I guess I just don’t want anyone to get their hopes up that this means anything at all. It could be literally nothing. Or it could be something. We’ll have to be patient.
Read 7 tweets
Sep 11
(🔐) NEW @ PROOF: An Alphabetical Compendium of the Dangerous and Deadly Weapons Insurrectionists Wielded at the Capitol on January 6

This is the most comprehensive report of its type ever published—and it’s stunning. I hope you’ll subscribe, read and RT. sethabramson.substack.com/p/an-alphabeti…
1/ Yes, you read that correctly. There are *over 115 different types of weapons* listed here, all taken from major-media and/or DOJ/FBI reports on the January 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol.
2/ This compendium doesn’t include the arsenal of heavy weaponry Trump’s paramilitary supporters at the Comfort Inn Ballston had compiled in preparation for the third stage of the attack on the Capitol (the first being the *storming* of the building, the second its *occupation*).
Read 30 tweets
Sep 11
We already know Donald Trump’s allies in the Kremlin have overseen systematic war crimes in Ukraine. I believe that 5 years from now—when the picture of what Putin did is even clearer—it will shock the world to a degree we can’t even contemplate.

This is from Human Rights Watch:
And yes—I’ll continue to link Trump, the GOP and far-right media to the Kremlin. Trump was secretly conducting real estate deals with the Kremlin in 2015-16, sought to end sanctions on Russia over Ukraine thereafter, and oversaw the GOP/right-wing media becoming Putin apologists.
Under Trump, the GOP became a pro-Kremlin/anti-NATO party. Trump sent a clear signal to Putin that he didn’t see Ukraine as being of any strategic interest to America. He sought to normalize diplomatic relations with war criminals who were currently in a cyberwar with our nation.
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(