Thread by @Aabhas24

What they say:

1)Indian Muslims of current time mustn’t be held responsible for crimes done by tyrants like Tipu & Aurangzeb

& then they also say:

2)What happened in past mustn’t be settled for peace

By saying (2) they beat their (1).

I agree to (1) & hence want to fix all the issues of past (as it has nothing to do with current Muslims) & if anyone opposes such step (like #GyanvapiCase ), he/she is no different than that tyrant (Aurangzeb).

Indian can’t have place or affinity for any Aurangzeb under any circumstances.

If someone argues that now that Muslims have been praying there (say #GyanvapiCase ), since 3 centuries we must let it go for peace, then they put a big “?” on current Muslims.

Do they mean to say that Indian Muslims have absolutely no identity except for preserving the legacy on the floors of crime inflicted by likes of Khilji, Aurangzeb, Ghori?

Then it draws line outright between Muslims & Indians.

If they have been praying at some place for 3 centuries, they are doing so after someone destroyed our place of “Worship” back then.

You crib for restoring peace by not disturbing status of a crime whose affect has become religious connection of some?

Or do you (those who want us not ask for Mandirs) believe in heart that the Muslim community is so fragile that it would disrupt the whole nation & Hindus can take the brute forever?

But such doesn’t seem the case at all.

Forces of Indian State is capable enough to take care of any unfortunate conspiracy or attempt to sabotage nation.

I do understand that “breaking India forces” know it well too that creating unrest in name of religious places would see them lose ground big time.

Hence strategically they only chose ground which can directly connect with the sentiment of “Ummah”.

They raised the matter of CAA, Hijab & Prophet Muhammad (pbuh)’s humiliation which could pump in support and resource from across globe.

I must warn those people (Hindus) questioning Hindus for claiming back their Mandirs that you are helping to recreate a model that had led to creation of Pakistan.

But you must remember a name, Jogindernath Mandal.

You might not weep today, but your future generations would, or may be they would become those Muslims who would be as unapologetic about their conversion as are those from whole subcontinent.

Well, even Dr. Ambedkar too was flirting with Islam only to realise at the end that “Islam can’t allow a true Muslim to consider India as motherland or Hindu as own kith & kin.”

Even Gurudev Rabindranath Tagore had warned us. He feared that Muslims would bully Hindus.