In 2010, @JonathanShedler published an article in the flagship journal of the American Psychological Association, The American Psychologist. 🧵
At the time, it was controversial because his article argued that psychodynamic psychotherapy, long derided as irrelevant and ineffective, is empirically supported as effective.
One of my favorite parts of the article was his reference to the work of Blagys and Hilsenroth (2000) who identified by empirical means 7 techniques used by psychodynamic therapists that are different than those of other therapies. They are:
Focus on affect and expression of emotion
Exploration of attempts to avoid distressing thoughts or feelings
Identification of recurring themes and patterns
Discussion of past experience (developmental focus)
Focus on interpersonal relations
Focus on the therapy relationship
Exploration of fantasy life
I find these plain English ways of thinking about psychodynamic technique incredibly helpful, especially since technique can be exceedingly complicated.
For those new to psychoanalysis, it can be daunting to try to grasp what it would mean to offer a helpful interpretation. I notice that those new to psychoanalysis report freezing up or going blank when trying to think of something helpful to say.
Using the language of Blagys and Hilsenroth makes thinking through what might be most helpful to people a bit more accessible.
For those who are familiar with psychoanalysis, one reason I love this way of thinking about psychoanalysis is that it serves a unifying function.
Psychoanalytic theory is pluralistic and different theorists often have professional conflicts with each other about who’s thinking is most useful.
But, my guess is that these techniques encompass the work of the vast majority of psychoanalytically oriented clinicians no matter their theoretical positions. In that sense, I think it helps to unify us. If you’ve never read the article, it’s well worth the read.
I find Alonso’s conceptualization of the foundations of psychoanalytic thinking very helpful. But, a lot has changed since she wrote her chapter on the basics of psychodynamic theory in 1989. 🧵
Since she wrote there have been significant shifts in thinking about the structures of the mind, what is motivating people, developmental theory, what constitutes problems in living (pathology),
what might be the source of change in people, how the therapy relationship works and the role of the therapist in the treatment, and the importance of and conceptualization of relationships among other things.
The last of Alonso’s foundations of psychodynamic theory is the idea that there is an assumption that our mind is in conflict. While we may not be aware of this conflict, parts of our minds are working against each other. 🧵
For instance, we may have needs for closeness while also having needs for separation. These conflicts are often not in our awareness and sometimes experienced as ambivalence or anxiety.
To resolve these conflicts, sometimes we use a defense mechanism (I posted definitions for about 30 of them back in May/June). And, sometimes the cost, in the form of symptoms, make the defenses used less than pleasant.
In the avoidant type of attachment insecurity, the child ignores the caregiver who inconsistently shows attunement. They literally avoid their caregiver. But, this does not mean they lack feelings. In some instances, children with this 1/5
2/5 style appear to approach their caregiver when they’ve been separated and then sometimes, at the last moment, attempt to ignore them. Adults with this type of insecurity often experience themselves and are experienced by others as independent.
3/5 They can appear confident and accomplished. When in relationships though, they sometimes struggle to find closeness and can get to a point in the connection where they feel compelled to distance themselves or break up.
There are 3 types of insecure attachment: ambivalent, avoidant, and disorganized. In the ambivalent type, the child feels conflicted about being in the presence of the caregiver. It is relatively common to see a child in this situation become angry when a 1/5
2/5 caregiver has left and then returns. It is also common to see that they may be passive or helpless. Adults often experience this insecurity as a sense of low self-worth. When a partner is not attuned to them, even if just occasionally, they can feel as
3/5 if they are not worthy of love and be self-blaming. They sometimes need persistent reassurance that they are loved and lovable. Fear of abandonment can sometimes be overwhelming and sometimes they will cling to the relationship to try to solve their fear.