derek guy Profile picture
Sep 17, 2022 9 tweets 6 min read Read on X
HOW TO LOOK BETTER IN A SUIT 🧵

Modern tailoring makes me very sad. Stuff not only fits poorly, but it often has no shape. You are basically paying for tailored clothing but getting none of the benefits of tailoring. Some things to look for when buying suits or sport coats
First, tailoring is special because of how it's constructed. Casualwear is typically made from just one layer of material, but suits and sport coats are comprised of multiple layers: haircloth for chest, padding for shoulder, canvas for body, etc. Look at how these materials roll
These materials are layered on top of each other and stitched together. Along the chest and lapel, a tailor will also use a technique called pad stitching, which transforms a two-dimensional piece of cloth into a three-dimensional shape. Pad stitching can make flat cloth rounded
Different factories/ tailors will have their own way of making things, so things sometimes differ. For example, in Britain, ppl often use three layers of material: chest piece, canvas, and domette. In Italy, sometimes they just use the body canvas, no chest piece or domette
In the last 20 years, tailoring has become so clinical and shapeless. This is partly because companies keep taking material out of their suit jackets to casualize the look and make it more comfortable. But as a result, it's hard to build in shape. Plus, everyone wants slim fits
Let's look at how tailors can build shape

1. Good pad stitching & pressing give the lapel a roll
2. Extended shoulder can confer a v-shaped silhouette
3. Shape of lapels and quarters can hint at motion
4. Cut of pattern and chest piece can give the chest some fullness
Modern tailoring often lacks these qualities.

Stuff is often too slim and short. Sometimes it looks like the person can barely button their jacket.

If the coat fits, the silhouette is too clean and clinical. Shoulder seam sits on shoulder bone, etc

Lapels are flat. No roll.
It makes me sad to see people pay for tailored clothing, but not get any actual tailoring. Some things basically have the silhouette of a chore coat.
Look at old photos of men in tailoring, particularly between the 1930s and '80s. That's when stuff was best. You don't have to recreate those looks, but getting a sense of how tailoring was shaped back then can allow you to wear better tailoring today.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with derek guy

derek guy Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @dieworkwear

Mar 21
In the 1950s, Irving Penn traveled across London, Paris, and NYC to take portraits of workers in their work clothes. These clothes at the time were not considered glamorous — they would not have shown up on fashion runways — but they demonstrate a simple aesthetic principle 🧵 Image
Consider these outfits. How do you feel about them? Are they charming? Repulsive? Stylish?

If you consider them charming and stylish, as I do, then ask yourself: what makes them charming and stylish? Why are you drawn to the outfits? Image
Image
Image
Image
As I've mentioned before, I think outfits look better when they have "shape and drape." By shape, I mean the outfit confers a distinctive silhouette. If these men took off their clothes, we can reliably guess their bodies would not be shaped like this: Image
Image
Read 14 tweets
Feb 20
Let me show you a wardrobe you can build with $1,700 🧵
NAVY SPORT COAT

If you're just dipping your toes into tailored clothing, start with a navy sport coat. This is something you can wear with a button-up shirt and pair of trousers, or something as casual as a t-shirt and some jeans. It's easily the most versatile jacket. Image
Image
Image
Image
Key is to get something with texture so it doesn't look like an orphaned suit jacket. Spier & Mackay has great semi-affordable tailoring. Their navy hopsack Moro is made from pure wool and a half-canvas to give it shape. Classic proportions and soft natural shoulder

Price: $358 Image
Image
Read 16 tweets
Feb 16
There's a pervasive belief that we no longer produce clothes in the United States. This is not true. In this thread, I will tell you about some great made-in-USA brands — some that run their own factories, while others are US brands contracting with US factories. 🧵 Image
I should first note this thread focuses on well-made, stylish clothes produced in ethical conditions. For me, producing in the US is not enough. It means nothing if the clothes are ugly, crappy, or produced in sweatshop conditions. My article for The Nation below. Image
Image
JEANS

Gustin produces MiUSA jeans using raw Japanese denim. "Raw" means the fabric hasn't been pre-distressed, allowing it to naturally fade with use, reflecting your actual body and lifestyle. I like their fuller 1968 Vintage Straight fit. They also do lots of other stuff. Image
Image
Read 17 tweets
Feb 7
Your suggestions are shit ass.

Let me tell you about backpacks. 🧵 Image
Image
Image
Image
Let's first establish good vs bad ways to think about style. The first pic is correct — style is a kind of social language and you have to figure out what type of person you are. The second pic is stupid bc it takes style as disconnected objects ("this is in" vs "this is out"). Image
Image
I should also note here that I'm only talking about style. I'm not here to argue with you about ergonomics, water bottle holders, or whether something accommodates your Dell laptop. I'm am talking about aesthetics.
Read 18 tweets
Feb 5
It's true that Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney has a rounded back and forward pitched shoulders. But let me show you something. 🧵
Watch these two videos. Then answer these two questions:

— Which of the two men is better dressed?
— How does each come off?
I think Carney is better dressed, partly because his clothes fit better. Notice that his jacket collar always hugs his neck, while Pierre Poilievre's jacket collar never touches him.

Why do Poilievre's jackets fit like this? Image
Image
Read 11 tweets
Jan 18
The level of craftsmanship that goes into a lot of Japanese menswear simply doesn't exist in the United States. You can do this for many categories — suits, jeans, hats, etc.

In this thread, I will show you just one category: men's shoes 🧵
For this comparison, I will focus on Japanese bespoke shoemaking vs. US ready-to-wear. The level of bespoke craftsmanship shown here simply doesn't exist in the US, so a Japanese bespoke vs. US bespoke comparison would be unfair. US bespoke is mostly about orthopedic work.
So instead, I will focus on the best that the US has to offer: ready-to-wear Alden.

On a basic level, top-end Japanese shoes are better because they are handwelted, whereas Alden shoes are Goodyear welted. The first involves more handwork and can be resoled more often. Image
Image
Read 24 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(