Tom Warner Profile picture
Sep 18 10 tweets 4 min read
A thread on Russia's rail supply lines to its occupying forces in Ukraine - how these have been affected by the recent Kharkiv offensive, and what's likely to happen next if, as I expect, Ukraine moves next to retake northern Luhansk oblast. 🧵 With minor corrections plus Sumy and Russian rail junctions
The hubs of the rail network supplying Russia's occupation of northeast Ukraine are laid out like a pyramid. At the top is the primary supply hub Voronezh, then the junctions of Stary Oskol and Liski, and finally the forward supply hubs of Belgorod, Valuyki and Millerovo. /2
Belgorod till recently was the most important forward hub and most in the news. Its rail routes west to Sumy, south to Kharkiv and southeast to Kupyansk made it a natural invasion staging ground. But after the Kharkiv offensive, all those routes lead to liberated territory. /3
And now the route from Belgorod to Russian occupation forces is much longer. The options are to loop by train back through Stary Oskol, or to go by road first to Valuyki. In short, aside from inertia, Russia has no more reason to use Belgorod as a forward hub. /4
Meanwhile Valuyki has gained weight. The line from it southeast across Luhansk oblast is now the main supply line for Russians in the northeast. By winding through Luhansk, this line can also supply Lysychansk (east of Sloviansk), recently cut off from routes via Kupyansk. /5
For that reason, the rail line southeast from Valuyki is likely to be among the first targets of the next offensive. Troitske, the northmost major town on the line, is about a 90-minute drive from Kupyansk. (From there it runs to Starobilsk.) /6
Russia's one other northeast forward hub, Millerovo, is reached by a different line from Voronezh via Liski. This line runs across a small part of Ukrainian territory, so Russia is likely to try to cling to that area even if it loses the rest of northern Luhansk oblast. /7
Millerovo has another problem: its line to Luhansk enters Ukraine north of the Donets, an area Russia might lose if it loses northern Luhansk oblast. Ukraine tenaciously held the rail junction at Stanytsa Luhanska (under the "n" of Luhansk) from 2014 until this year. /8
In the southeast the hub at Gukovo is reached from Millerovo, Rostov - the area's main supply center - or Volgograd to the east. If Ukraine cuts the line from Voronezh to Millerovo, the quickest way by train from central Russia to SE Ukraine would be via Volgograd to Gukovo. /9
Turning finally to the south, the crucial rail hub is Dzhankoy - in the news last month as one of the targets of a series of still unexplained long-range strikes by Ukraine in Crimea. Both rail lines into mainland Ukraine from Crimea come from Dzhankoy. /10 end

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Tom Warner

Tom Warner Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @warnerta

Sep 19
I see one answer to two puzzles about the recent course of this war. Why did Russia leave Kharkiv oblast so exposed? And why is Russia now focusing on tiny gains in Bakhmut while weakly countering Ukraine's preparations for another NE offensive? In short: Potemkin syndrome.🧵
Russia didn't just fail to react to Ukraine's build-up in Kharkiv. @DefMon3 has compiled evidence that Russia was drawing down troop levels in the region, leading him to suggest that Russia might have been attacked while already planning a withdrawal. /2
But a planned withdrawal would make no sense: the section of Kharkiv oblast that Ukraine liberated included the Russian occupants' main northern rail and road supply arteries, both via Kupyansk. /3
Read 10 tweets
Sep 16
After five days of Ukraine's northeast advance being paused at the Oskil river, we are starting to hear plausible rumors of preparations for a continuation. According to two Russian milbloggers monitored by ISW, things are afoot along the north and south parts of the river.🧵
By one account, the Ukrainian army has crossed the Oskil and emplaced artillery at Hryanykivka, about 25km SW from where the Oskil enters Ukraine from Russia. If true this is either very bold, or Russian forces in the NE remain very weak. Image
Hryanykivka is <45km or <60km by road from a rail line used by Russia to supply its forces in Luhansk oblast. It runs SE through Troitske. Sentinel imagery shows the larger of two bridges at Hryanykivka was damaged between 9/3 & 9/10, but the smaller bridge appears to be intact.
Read 5 tweets
Sep 8
The Balaklia offensive makes this 3-month-old map relevant again. It's all about Russia's attempt to make a very long front more defensible in order to stalemate Ukraine into accepting a frozen conflict. The difference is, now Ukraine has the initiative. 🧵
In June, my point was that Russia knew its offensive capacity was dwindling, so its targets were chosen to improve defensibility. Taking Ukraine-held pockets NE of the Donets would turn the river into a defensive barrier, and taking the Lysychansk area would shorten the front. /2
Much of that happened. Small pockets around Severodonetsk, Lyman and Svyatohirsk (the red dots) all fell. But as I noted then, there was a fourth, larger Ukraine-held pocket NE of the Donets that wasn't under attack. And Russia continued to ignore it. /3
Read 9 tweets
Aug 23
Today's Trump filing in short. 🧵
1) There's a 10-page retelling of the case so far, mainly arguing that Trump was fully cooperating. It's frivolous. Notably, it hints he might want to use his silly "I declassified everything" claim in court.
storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.usco…
2) pp. 11-12 argue the warrant was overbroad by allowing seizure of case-unrelated items merely in the vicinity of case-related items. This will matter and will be a court fight if agents found and seized something incriminating unrelated to presidential documents.
3) p. 12 suggests the Feds might have faked a classified-documents case because they were frustrated by the presidential records act's lack of an enforcement mechanism. The suggestion is couched in "did they ...?" sentences that avoid alleging they did. This is frivolous.
Read 13 tweets
Aug 21
I want to revisit the topic of Ukrainian vs Russian views of the Turkic world, because Kamil blocked me for arguing, which seems cowardly. Kamil writes much I like, but I think he's more Russified and ignorant of Ukraine than he realizes. /kamilkazani/status/1551383280498483207 Image
In this thread, Kamil set out the position that Ukrainians learned to believe Turkic and steppe cultures were inferior from their former hegemon, Russia. While surely that influence matters, Kamil made two big, glaring mistakes, which deserve to be rebutted. Image
First, while both Russia and Ukraine have long histories of racism towards Turkic and Mongol cultures, in the folk-culture xenophobia way and the modern ideology of race way, that history is very different in Russia and Ukraine, mainly because of modern Russia's hegemon status.
Read 17 tweets
Aug 14
A thread explaining how very serious the espionage case against Trump is. We still don't know what information he took home and twice withheld from official demands. But if we read the investigation documents and the law, it becomes clear that he's likely to go down for life.🧵
The section of espionage law that Trump is being investigated under is 18 USC § 793, according to the search warrant for the recent FBI raid of his home.
documentcloud.org/documents/2213…
Paragraph (f) of this section of law makes it a crime for anyone with lawful access to any kind of information related to the national defense to remove it from proper custody. The penalty for doing so is either fine or imprisonment up to 10 years.
law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18…
Read 25 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(