Marc Johnson Profile picture
Sep 18, 2022 19 tweets 7 min read Read on X
SARS-CoV-2 lineages, Cryptic lineages, and a prediction of what the next dominant VOCs will be.
We sequence SARS-CoV-2 from wastewater using a different approach than most. We sequence smallish fragments of the genome so that we can tell if particular mutations are derived from the same virus. This way we are better able to determine if there is anything new circulating. Image
About a year and a half ago we detected something from a St. Louis sewershed that didn't make sense. SARS-CoV-2 lineages whose sequence did not match anything that had been seen from patients. We called these 'cryptic lineage'. Image
Wanting to know if this kind of thing was common, we started collaborating with @DrJDennehy to see if we could find anything similar in other places. NYC also had cryptic lineages. Not the same lineages, but lineages with similar characteristics.
nature.com/articles/s4146…
By the end of 2021, we had identified 9 sewersheds (out of about 180 that were being routinely surveyed) that contained cryptic lineages, including a lineage from California with @RoseKantor.
medrxiv.org/content/10.110…
My obsession with finding and characterizing these cryptic lineages accelerated in 2022. To date we have screened wastewater from around 700 sewersheds. In total we have found 24 putative lineages. I say putative because some of them we have only seen once.
We still didn't know where these lineages were coming from. I was convinced of an animal reservoir. What changed my mind is when we tracked a lineage in Wisconsin with @dho all the way to a single set of bathrooms. There is no animal contribution. It is from a person. Image
What we think is happening is that cryptic lineages are very long-term infections in people (often >1 year). Perhaps GI infections. The hosts are obviously mounting an immune response, but are not able to clear the infection.
Because there are no genetic bottlenecks from spreading from person-to-person, these viruses basically push the evolutionary fast-forward button.
What can these lineages tell us about circulating viruses? These are the sites in the Spike RBD that are most commonly changed in the cryptic lineages. We had seen lineages with these changes long before they were seen in Omicron. Image
When Omicron arrived (shown in red) it had mutations at many of the same sites. The main exceptions were L452 and N460, which were common in cryptic lineages, but were not in Omicron (BA.1). Image
About six months later we started seeing Omicron lineages with mutations at L452. Highlighted in red are the changes in BA.4/5 (which has L452R), but there were also lineages with L452Q, L452M, and others. These lineages took over, but there were still no changes at N460. Image
Finally, a few months ago N460K appeared in an Omicron lineage (BA.2.75). However, it was not combined with any of the L452 mutations. Nonetheless, BA.2.75 and its derivatives have continued to expand and slowly displace other lineages. Image
A few days ago, a new lineage appeared in a MO wastewater sample. Omicron with L452R+N460K (and K444M). This appears to match a new lineage that was just designated as BU.1 a few days ago. Currently there are only 13 sequences in GISAID with this combination of mutations. Image
However, I recently learned from @CorneliusRoemer that I was behind in my lineages. There is another completely independent lineage that arrived at almost exactly the same combination. This lineage is designated BQ.1.1. This group has L452R+K444T (rather than K444M).
In addition, BQ.1.1 has also picked up R346T (also in BA.4.6). We haven't focused as much on this region of spike, but most cryptic lineages that we have checked also have a mutation at this site. It seems to be pretty critical. BQ.1.1 is new, but it seems to be taking off.
There you have it. BQ and BU. I don't know if they will cause a spike in total cases, but barring something completely new appearing, I predict that they will be the dominant VOCs in the coming months.
Addendum. It seems a few other lineages have hit very similar 'jackpot' combinations very recently. In addition to BU and BQ:

BW.1 (BA.5.6 derivative)
BS.1 (BA.2.3 derivative)
BR.2 (BA.2.75 derivative)
other undesignated

They all have N460K, L452R + other changes.
Real pango experts, please correct me if I botch any of these, or have missed any. @CorneliusRoemer @PeacockFlu @siamosolocani @LongDesertTrain

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Marc Johnson

Marc Johnson Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @SolidEvidence

Aug 17
I'm giving the variant update at the SAVE meeting on Monday so I thought I'd put out a preview for comment.

We are now at our 4th 'high water' mark since the Omicron wave based on wastewater surveillance.

1/ Image
I thought I would give an abbreviated summary of the last year in variants.

A little over a year ago BA.2.86 started circulating, a lineage that was almost certainly derived from a persistent infection.
2/ Image
BA.2.86 was pretty fit, but it was still sensitive to a lot of Class 1 antibodies.

However, it quickly picked up S:L455S (making it JN.1), which evaded these antibodies, and it was off to the races.
3/ Image
Read 15 tweets
Jul 24
Just returning from the CEIRR influenza annual meeting.

Here are my takeaways.

1/
First the bad news.

2.3.4.4b (which the H5 in cattle is derived from) is a bad ass. In birds it is ridiculously contagious, ridiculously promiscuous, and pretty darn deadly. It spread through typical and atypical US bird populations practically instantly.

2/
Now the good news.

The lineage has mixed pathogenicity in mammals (don't let your pet ferrets play near wild birds), but generally is very poor at mammalian respiratory spread, even in species where it is highly pathogenic.

3/
Read 6 tweets
Jul 6
MO COVID wastewater update. Although it's not major, there has been a noticeable uptick on COVID levels the last few weeks.

1/ Image
In my thinking, there are 3 things that contribute to these fluctuations: the viral lineage, host immunity, and human behavior.
2/
I don't think the viral lineage has much to do with this uptick. We've been experiencing a gradual takeover of a scattering of JN.1 derivatives, but they have been with us for a while and don't seem to correlate with the increase.
3/
Read 7 tweets
Jun 7
Update on the Maryland variant, the highly diverse Delta variant from a sewershed South of Baltimore.
1/ Image
This sewershed only started sequencing earlier this year, so I don't know how long it has been around, but it is clearly Delta-derived, which means the infection probably occurred in the second half of 2021, nearly 3 years ago.
2. Image
The lineage has been showing up pretty consistently in the first sewershed, but on May 21 it also appeared in the sewershed just to the West. Daytrip.
3/ Image
Read 8 tweets
Jun 5
Update on the unexpected H5 detections from wastewater.

Thanks to all that helped figure this out.

1/
There were 4 sewersheds that had detectable H5 from states that have not been reported to have infected herds. Those 4 were from Minnesota and Iowa.

2/
data.wastewaterscan.org/tracker?charts…
The easiest to explain is Mankato. They have a Dairy plant.



MN is not supposed to be in MN herds, but the milk could have been trucked in from SD.
3/ mda.state.mn.us/minnesotadairy…
Image
Read 7 tweets
May 4
A few points about the H5N1 outbreak that I'd like to share.

1. If we had a pan-influenza wastewater screen in place nationally that differentiates the influenza sources by sequencing (which isn't that hard to do), we probably would have detected this outbreak months ago.
1/
BTW, we submitted a CDC proposal earlier this year to do exactly this, but the topic was pulled from the BAA so the proposal wasn't even reviewed.
2/
2. We should not panic about the current outbreak in cattle. You aren't going to get influenza from pasteurized milk, and this virus isn't ready for human-to-human spread (yet).
3/
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(