The three M109 variants:
• M109A3GN modernized & donated by Norway
• M109A4BE modernized by Belgium & donated by the UK
• M109A5Ö modernized by Austria & donated by Latvia (photo)
have a 39 caliber barrel and thus an 18 liter charge chamber, which can hold max. 2/n
five M232A1 charges. This results in a maximum range of 24 km with boat tail projectiles and 30 km with base bleed projectiles.
Being the oldest design the M109 require manual projectile loading, manual projectile ramming, manual charge loading, manual primer loading.
3/n
Only the Austrian M109A5Ö has a semi-automatic rammer, which allows for slightly faster operation.
The Austrian rammer is similar (but not the same) as the semi-automatic rammers in the US Army's M109A6 Paladin shown in this clip.
4/n
The donated M109 require time and proximity fuzes to be set manually before the projectiles are rammed into the barrel.
All three are better than the Soviet 2S1 Gvozdika & 2S3 Akatsiya howitzers Ukraine used before, but the next howitzers are much more advanced.
5/n
The Slovak Zuzana 2 is a wheeled, fully automatic self-propelled howitzer:
• colored in red the projectile storage, which holds max. 40 projectiles
• colored in blue the charge storage, which holds max. 240 M232A1 charges
6/n
The Zuzana 2's 52 caliber barrel has a 23 liter charge chamber, which can hold max. 6 M232A1 charges.
This results in a maximum range of 30 km with boat tail projectiles and 40 km with base bleed projectiles - identical to the range of the AHS Krab and PzH 2000.
7/n
The Zuzana 2 can stop fire 6 rounds in a minute then depart, making it impossible for enemy counter battery fire to hit her.
In the following clip at 17 seconds the loading of projectiles and fuzes is shown.
8/n
The Zuzana 2 (like Krab and PzH 2000) is MRSI capable and sets time and proximity fuzes automatically.
French/Swedish BONUS rounds also work with the Zuzana 2.
Ukraine received so far four Zuzana 2, with another four arriving later this year.
9/n
The Polish AHS Krab has the same barrel, charge chamber, & range specs as the Zuzana 2.
The Krab has semi-automatic projectile loading, automatic projectile ramming, manual charge loading, automatic primer loading.
I found this clip of Ukrainian troops operating the Krab, 10/n
but even after editing it, the clip doesn't show how the Krab's loading mechanism works.
As the Krab turret is a version of the British Army's AS-90 - here is a clip of a British AS-90 crew, which shows how the ammo moves from the automatic magazine to the barrel. 11/n
Last but not least the German/Dutch PzH 2000 has the same barrel, charge chamber, & range specs as the Zuzana 2 and Krab.
What sets the PzH 2000 apart is its fully automatic projectile loading & ramming. Charges are loaded manually, while primers are loaded automatically.
12/n
The PzH 2000 sets time & proximity fuzes, & M982 Excalibur projectiles automatically, & is compatible with BONUS and SMArt projectiles.
In short - it is the best self-propelled howitzer in the world.
Even a single soldier can fire four rounds in 30 seconds with a PzH 2000. 13/n
With the PzH 2000, AHS Krab and Zuzana 2 Ukraine now fields three of the most modern self-propelled howitzers, but with just 18 PzH 2000, 18 Krab and 4 Zuzana 2 Ukraine is short by 100 howitzers.
Ukraine needs and deserves to receive more of these awesome systems ASAP.
14/.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Please stop saying Europe should cancel weapons deals with the US.
Yes, we should not sign new weapon deals with the US; but canceling existing deals will hurt Ukraine and also Europe.
And there are 3 reasons for that. Let me explain.
1) Europe's armed forces have nearly
1/19
0 spare equipment, as almost everything taken out of service over the last 35 years was either sold off or scrapped. Europe must continue to support Ukraine and therefore Europe needs to buy whatever weapons it can get it hands on to free up equipment to donate to Ukraine. 2/n
I.e. you can't demand that Belgium cancel its F-35A deal and demand that Belgium must donate its F-16 to Ukraine...
Norway, Denmark and the Netherlands could donate their F-16 to Ukraine, because they already received enough F-35A as replacement. 3/n
🇬🇧 @Keir_Starmer is NOT increasing defence spending this year.
🇬🇧 @Keir_Starmer is NOT increasing defence spending next year.
🇬🇧 @Keir_Starmer is increasing defence spending FROM (!) April 2027 by 0.2%.
This means that for
1/7
the next two years the British Armed Forces get nothing. They will remain as broken as they are.
The British Army has 78,000 troops of which just 18,000 are combat capable (the remaining 60,000 (= 77%) lack the materiel, training, equipment, etc. to be useful).
2/7
The situation is even worse for the Royal Navy.
Next year the British Armed Forces actually get even LESS money than this year (inflation is 10 times higher than GDP growth and so inflation cuts into the defence budget).
Then from April 2027 the situation will begin to
3/7
Yesterday I posted a thread about American weapons and components in fighter aircraft and how Europe has to wean itself off them.
Today let's look at transport, tanker, maritime patrol, and airborne early warning aircraft.
(Tomorrow then trainer aircraft and drones)
1/25
Transport aircraft come in two sizes: for strategic airlift or tactical airlift.
Simplified: strategic airlift transports materiel between continents and tactical airlift within a theater of operations.
For strategic airlift the choice for Europe is easy: A400M Atlas, because 2/n
it is the only strategic airlifter in production (C-17 Globemaster production ceased in 2015) and because the French were involved in its design the A400M Atlas comes with all key parts "Made in Europe".
Yes, it carries only half the payload of the C-17 Globemaster, but for 3/n
Let's talk about American weapons and how Europe has to wean itself off them.
Part 1 of a long thread; this one looking at fighter jets.
First and foremost: Europe has to get all American made components out of all weapon systems produced in Europe. If Trump can shut down a
1/24
European production line by withholding a component, then that component has to replaced... and if that is impossible, then that weapon system has no future and production has to end.
As for the F-35... Europe has nothing even close in combat capability. Best course will be 2/n
to see the existing deals through and then focus on acquiring Eurofighters and Rafales, both of which are way more capable than whatever junk russia sends up in the air.
The main issue will be that the Rafale's production line is running already at full capacity, while the 3/n
The Gripen was designed by Sweden for Sweden's Bas 90 air base system and - truly - Sweden built the perfect fighter for Sweden's Bas 90 system... which resulted in a fighter no one but Sweden needs.
Bear with me as I explain a few things @Saab doesn't want you to know.
1/29
Bas 90 was developed in the 1970s, when the Swedish Air Force was flying the Viggen (and some upgraded Draken). Bas 90 consisted of some 30+ reserve air bases with a 2,000+ metres (6,600+ ft) long main runway and 2-3 short runways of 800 metres (2,600 ft). 2/n
Here are the airbases of Kubbe (63°37'59.81"N 17°56'10.79"E) and Jokkmokk (66°29'48.43"N 20° 8'45.17") with the short runways highlighted in red.
Some of the short runways used public roads, but most were built specifically for the Bas 90 system in the 1980s. 3/n
I set out to create a table showing the reduction in British Infantry units between 1989 and 2025...
After doing Scotland, Wales and Yorkshire - I gave up.
For three reason:
a) the sheer size of it! The British Army had 100 infantry battalions in 1989 (not counting the 1/8
nine battalions of the Ulster Defence Regiment).
b) the British Army's habit of reroling battalions every four years.
c) the disbanding of volunteer regiments in the early 1990s, then the merging of volunteer battalions into new volunteer regiments in the mid 1990s, and then
2/8
the disbanding of these new volunteer regiments some 5-6 years later, followed by the de-merging of some of the volunteer battalions.
In short: it was all very haphazard and chaotic!
So, instead here come the numbers about the British Army's infantry decline between 1989
3/8