Worth watching: analysis of the successes of the Ukrainian counteroffensive by Brigade General Freuding, fresh from a visit to Kyiv.

He cites Zelenskyy “this counteroffensive didn’t start in early September but on 24 Feb”

This really needs English subtitles @bundeswehrInfo !

Sharing some of my personal highlights from Gen Freuding’s analysis here:
Such strategic & operative excellence as Ukraine’s deception manoeuvre with Kherson/ Kharkiv has not been seen for several decades - not since the allied operation in the beginning of the Gulf War 1990/91. It’s something for the “school books”
There can be no talk of Russian forces regrouping, they very obviously fled in such a hurry that even food was left on tables.

They left so much equipment behind that it almost equals a whole brigade. We will soon see how Ukraine will make use of it
Geb Freuding cites a NATO defence minister to illustrate the amount of equipment Russian troops left behind while chaotically fleeing: “it was the biggest donation to the Ukrainian armed forces since the beginning of the war”
Western weapons helped but the credit for the success of the counteroffensive goes entirely to Ukrainian forces who executed the operation with tactical excellence, high morale and high combat effectiveness.
The previously ~1300km long front was notably shortened as a consequence. Russia can now execute operations only frontally or from the south. Russian troops depend on railways for their logistics and their supply lines have come significantly under pressure
About “the mystery of the missing Russian air force” (Gen Freuding cites the @RUSI_org article by @Justin_Br0nk): reasons for Russia’s poor performance are the failure to establish air supremacy at the beginning of the war, logistical problems…

rusi.org/explore-our-re…
…and most importantly, the still largely intact Ukrainian air defence + the skill of the Ukrainian air force - they are by now able to deploy western missiles from their MiG-29 aircraft “and are very effectively doing so”
Russia faces now extreme psychological and organisational difficulties to consolidate and stabilise a new line of defence.
Strategic goals remain the same on both sides, however: for Russia the imperial quest of complete destruction of Ukrainian statehood; for Ukraine the complete restoration of territorial integrity and sovereignty
Tactical use of nuclear weapons on the Russian side would be an unprecedented “Zivilisationsbruch“ (rupture of civilisation) and alienate Russia’s few remaining partners, thus leading to complete isolation. Gen Freuding says nothing indicates that Russia is planning to do so

End

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Minna Ålander 🌻

Minna Ålander 🌻 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @minna_alander

Sep 21
Russia: *invades a neighbouring country for no good reason*

Also Russia: “our security is threatened, we have to take up arms to protect our nation”
Russia: *commits brutal war crimes in Ukraine*

Also Russia: “the West is so russophobic !”
Russia: *annexes Crimea against international law in 2014 and full-scale bombs whole Ukraine in 2022*

Also Russia: “the West has pushed Ukraine into war against us !”
Read 5 tweets
Sep 20
The frustration over the Finnish position on the visa ban is understandable, but so is also the difficulty of the decision for the govt. As far as I see it, it burns down to one dilemma:
Imposing a national ban would require defining all Russians as potential threat to Finland’s security or public order. However, the Finnish security authorities have not defined the situation as such yet.
Finland has also constantly emphasised that Russia poses currently no direct threat to Finland. In the newly revised Border Guard Act, for example, the idea of a threat is a Kremlin-engineered targeted flow of migrants directed to the Finnish border.
Read 8 tweets
Sep 20
Reducing Russia’s genocidal war against Ukraine’s very existence to a proxy war between 🇷🇺&🇺🇸 is one of the stickiest Russian narratives and possibly the most insulting one.

Esp because Ukraine has had to work so hard to get support from the West. Proxy what ?
Ukrainians emphasise that they’re fighting for Western values because

1) it’s true
2) they hope it to motivate the Western countries to support them (which has, unfortunately, NOT been a no-brainer)
This joke describes it best:

Putin: How is my war against NATO going ?
Advisor: We have so far lost 50,000 troops
Putin: And NATO ?
Advisor: NATO troops have not arrived yet
Read 4 tweets
Sep 17
A week ago, I had the pleasure to speak at a conference organised by @EESC_LT with the title “Building Baltic Consensus”, where participants from the Baltic and Nordic states & Germany came together to talk about the strategic outlook of our soon-to-be NATO lake. Some takeaways:
It was a great kick-off for hopefully continuing conversations about the changing regional security architecture, which used to be highly fragmented:

🇫🇮🇸🇪 in EU but not NATO, 🇮🇸🇳🇴 in NATO but not EU, 🇩🇰 in both but with opt-out in EU defence policy - while 🇳🇴 has an EU opt-in
🇫🇮🇸🇪 NATO membership and 🇩🇰’s decision to scrap the EU opt-out brings much-needed structural coherence into the region. While it’s no silver bullet and does not solve “the Baltic dilemma”, it nevertheless gives us new tools to address it more effectively and coherently
Read 7 tweets
Sep 15
It’s absolutely correct to remind that this war is far from over. That’s why Ukraine needs strong & sustained support.

But one shouldn’t underestimate the Ukrainian successes of the past weeks and the substantial damage they have done to Russia either
So it’s entirely possible to cheer Ukraine’s successful counteroffensive while also being entirely realistic that the winter will be hard nonetheless.

Caution is important but should also be based on a realistic analysis of facts on the ground.
Russia has vast, but not endless resources. An overcautious assessment is likely to result from focusing too much on the still untapped Russian potential and too little on Ukraine’s proven abilities:

- quality vs. quantity of troops & equipment
- will to fight/ morale
Read 6 tweets
Sep 14
Everyone else: *analysing the ingenious details of Ukrainian counteroffensive, like whoa*

German general: “sees no real counteroffensive in Ukraine”
m.focus.de/politik/auslan…
At least he admits that he was completely wrong as recently as two weeks ago when he thought that whole Donbas would be in Russian hands within 6 months
Reminds me of how the chief of the German intelligence service had to be rescued from Kyiv because he didn’t see the invasion coming m.focus.de/politik/auslan…
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(