It has all the charts from above, additional visualizations, and writing on how researchers deal with the many challenges of measuring conflicts and the deaths from them.
I am grateful to the many researchers who create the conflict data we use across our work @OurWorldInData.
Special thanks to @UCDP, whose data we use for our main visualizations, and my colleague @JoeHasell for creating the charts themselves.
If you think this thread could be interesting to others: like it, retweet it, or tell them about it!
Do you have any questions or suggestions? Then please send me a message here or email me at bastian@ourworldindata.org.
I look forward to hearing from you!
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Tomorrow is #PeaceDay. What’s the current state of peace and conflict worldwide?
We are closer to peace than for most of the 20th century, when many more people died in conflicts.
But deaths have recently increased in the Middle East, Africa, and Europe.
A 🧵 with key charts:
Armed conflict is common.
Recently, at least 150 armed conflicts were ongoing each year.
This number is up from previous decades, but even then, it rarely fell below 100, and there has been no year without armed conflict for centuries.
Among armed conflicts, conflicts between states are rare; intrastate conflicts and one-sided violence are more frequent; and non-state conflicts have become the most common type of conflict.
It provides several hundred interactive visualizations from eight leading democracy datasets.
A 🧵about what it includes:
Democracy data can be difficult to access and understand.
The Democracy Data Explorer therefore provides and explains data from eight datasets: RoW, V-Dem, the Lexical Index, Boix-Miller-Rosato, Polity, Freedom House, EIU and BTI.
To help you in choosing which dataset may be best to answer your questions, I have written a brief explainer that summarizes and compares all approaches here: ourworldindata.org/democracies-me…
To some young (and even older) people living in democracies, authoritarianism may seem like a long-forgotten part of their country’s history.
But this impression does not match people’s experiences across the world.
To put a date on how old democracies are worldwide, I use the Regimes of the World-classification from @AnnaLuehrmann, @mtannenberg, and @StaffanILindber and data from @vdeminsitute, going as far back as 1789. I describe this data in another article: bit.ly/3DoqhyV
Social scientists have long studied — and often found — that leftist governments pursue different policies than rightist governments (read a recent summary here: bit.ly/3yNHzVn). But this research has mainly focused on OECD countries, neglecting other parts of the world.
This focus on OECD countries in part is because researchers often use off-the-shelf datasets which only provide data on the ideologies of leaders and parties in OECD countries. This is where my GLI dataset comes in.