Simon Bottery Profile picture
Sep 22 10 tweets 5 min read
We’re expecting a statement from @theresecoffey on hospital discharge today. It certainly needs urgent action but a thorough plan will require more than just short term £££ and a focus on more than just #socialcare. A quick thread with some stats.
Historically, delayed discharges have not been mainly been due to #socialcare. Before COVID-19, it was responsible for only a THIRD of delays (the biggest issue: home care packages). The rest were due to NHS issues. There are no recent stats on this NHS/socialcare split though.
Have things got worse for #socialcare since then? Yes - there are fewer staff. The vacancy rate rose to 10.7% in 2021/22 (and may now be even worse). The biggest problem is home care, with a 13.2% vacancy rate. All this might well well be pushing up #socialcare delays.
What can be done about vacancies? Pay is critical; staff can get more in supermarkets. Tackling it is tough in the short term; paying bonuses/increasing underlying pay via local authorities contracts is probably the best option, although hard to evidence. kingsfund.org.uk/blog/2022/08/h…
What other, shorter term options are there? During Covid, to free up beds, the NHS paid for the first 6 weeks of #socialcare for people leaving hospital. This built on a ‘discharge to assess’ approach in which people were assessed for care needs only after they’d left hospital.
The discharge fund cost around £500m every 6 months. It helped, not least because it cut NHS/council wrangles about who pays for care. It ended in March 2022 (ICSs are supposed to keep the approach but without the extra £££).
But the discharge fund had issues. The £££ didn’t resolve the lack of NHS community capacity (and remember the NHS accounted for two thirds of delays before Covid). And there were persistent concerns that speed of discharge sometimes led to poorer outcomes for people.
Tackling discharge has also been a key focus of the Better Care Fund since it began in 2015. It requires #socialcare and the NHS (now via ICSs) to pool budgets to improve local discharge practice. It has improved local partnership working but remains a small % of overall spend.
Together, this means that tackling discharge requires a long-term plan as well as short-term funding. It needs to address the wider funding issues in #socialcare; develop a #socialcare workforce strategy, including pay; boost NHS community capacity; improve partnership working.
We’ll find out later this morning whether @theresecoffey has grasped all this or whether we remain stuck in a loop of short term finance to alleviate winter crises but with no overall strategy to tackle the deep rooted problems in #socialcare that contribute to discharge issues.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Simon Bottery

Simon Bottery Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @blimeysimon

Sep 22
The plan announced today by @theresecoffey to support #socialcare falls far short of the measures needed to ensure people get the support they need this winter and beyond. It was also, alarmingly, saw social care entirely through an NHS| lens. A thread. gov.uk/government/pub…
There were 3 measures announced, of which only one has real resources - a £500m fund to support hospital discharge. Details are scarce but it looks like targeted reinstatement of parts of the hospital discharge fund and recruitment/retention fund, both scrapped earlier this year. Image
The money is of course welcome and necessary but its short term nature and limited focus on discharge means it offers no more than a couple of stitches to the gaping wound that is the state of #socialcare at the moment.
Read 8 tweets
Aug 4
Another damning report on #socialcare today, this time from @CommonsLUHC: “The Government currently has nothing more than a vision [for social care], with no roadmap, no timetable, no milestones, and no measures of success.”
A thread on some key points…
committees.parliament.uk/committee/17/l…
The MPs commend the Government for “introducing reforms to the sector where previous Governments failed to act”. But they say it has “not come close to rescuing #socialcare, and needs to be open with the public that there is a long way to go.” So, a long way from being ‘fixed’.
It also urges the govt not to ignore the immediate crisis in the sector: “The Government is focused on long-term reform of adult social care, but in order to get to the future it needs to save the sector from the brink of collapse.”
Read 12 tweets
Jul 19
Top line on today’s @1adass survey of #socialcare directors? Funding isn’t sufficient to meet increased DEMAND and increased COSTS. But if that sounds familiar, this year there are a few important, COVID-related twists. A thread. adass.org.uk/adass-spring-b…
Let’s look at DEMAND first. Partly, this is demographics - it’s a familiar story that there are more older people, living longer; more working age people with disability, including LD; and more mental health issues. Directors think these will add 4% to budgets this year.
Added to this, the report now suggests demand arising from problems in the HEALTH system. As the NHS struggles, directors are seeing more people needing #socialcare due to early discharge from hospital, lack of community support or failure to admit people to hospital at all.
Read 14 tweets
Jun 13
I spent two days last week with social services professionals from 40+ countries at the @ESNsocial conference in Hamburg. A quick thread here on some key #socialcare themes. Very impressionistic and not always evidenced so take with large pinch of ‘salz’. essc-eu.org/about-essc-202…
Increasing demand for services seemed a consistent issue, forcing at least some countries to evaluate what they do and how. One Icelandic delegate said its country’s approach was ‘moving from a right to have services to a need to have services’.
That demand was mainly driven by long term factors, particularly ageing populations. But inevitably it was exacerbated by COVID-19, which exposed underlying structural problems. ‘We were unprepared as a sector’ said @ThomasBignal. Sound familiar? kingsfund.org.uk/publications/c…
Read 10 tweets
Mar 30
Lots of interest today in @TheKingsFund @NuffieldTrust findings about public satisfaction with the NHS. But the findings about #socialcare are no less remarkable. Only 15% say they are satisfied - the lowest of all services asked about. 50% are dissatisfied. A short thread…
This year, the survey asked WHY people are satisfied (or not). The main reasons are staff pay, unmet need, unaffordability of #socialcare and lack of support for unpaid carers. Lack of integration between health and care also gets a look in. These are familiar problems…
…and all grounded in fact: the number of people able to access long-term care has been falling since 2015/16, workforce pay has failed to keep pace with other sectors and 1 in 7 people are now estimated to face lifetime care costs of over £100,000. kingsfund.org.uk/publications/s…
Read 7 tweets
Mar 18
This is an important analysis on the implications of @DHSCgovuk 'fair cost of care' reform, which has received less attention than the 'cap' but involves an unprecedented, potentially risky intervention by govt in the #socialcare market. Quick thread:
countycouncilsnetwork.org.uk/new-analysis-w…
'Fair cost of care' basically involved the government funding local authorities to pay more for the care home places/homecare they commission. Why is government bothered about that? Two, related reasons...
1. Most councils, because they're short of cash, 'underpay' for publicly-funded care home places/homecare. To compensate, providers 'overcharge' people who self-fund their own care. This 'self-funder subsidy' is obviously unfair. However, it's not why govt is acting now...
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(