Jesse D. Jenkins Profile picture
Sep 22, 2022 15 tweets 7 min read Read on X
NEW REPEATProject.org analysis out on the importance of electricity transmission expansion to unlock the full emissions reduction potential (& health benefits) of the #InflationReductionAct: repeatproject.org/docs/REPEAT_IR…
Read on to learn why 100s of millions of tons are at stake.
First, this report does NOT model the impacts of the proposed 'permitting reform' bill being debated now. We began this work soon after finishing our analysis of IRA (repeatproject.org/docs/REPEAT_IR…) because expanding clean electricity is THE linchpin driving emissions cuts under IRA.
Previously, REPEAT Project estimated that IRA could cut U.S. greenhouse gas emissions by roughly one billion tons per year in 2030 and reduce cumulative greenhouse gas emissions by 6.3 billion tons of CO2-equivalent over the decade (2023-2032).
BUT, that outcome depends on more than doubling the historical pace of electricity transmission expansion over the last decade in order to interconnect new renewable resources at sufficient pace and meet growing demand from electric vehicles, heat pumps, & other electrification.
To meet growing demand for electricity, which we estimate could rise by ~24% by 2030 & ~43% by 2035, AND drive down power sector emissions and coal & gas use, we are going to need a bigger grid. Our original IRA analysis envisions 2.3%/year avg expansion of high-voltage capacity.
That pace is >2x the ~1%/yr rate over the past decade and slightly faster than the ~2%/year average expansion rate from 1978-2020 (credit Michael Cembalest: assets.jpmprivatebank.com/content/dam/jp…).
So this study explores alternative scenarios that constrain transmission to 1%, 1.5% & 2%/yr.
Findings:
1. Failing to accelerate transmission expansion beyond the recent historical pace (~1%/yr) increases 2030 GHG by ~800 million tons relative to estimated reductions in an unconstrained IRA case. Emissions are 200 Mt higher if transmission growth is limited to 1.5%/year.
2. Over 80% of the potential emissions reductions delivered by IRA in 2030 are lost if transmission expansion is constrained to 1%/year, and roughly 25% are lost if growth is limited to 1.5%/year.
3. To achieve IRA’s full emissions reduction potential, new clean electricity must be rapidly added to both meet growing demand from electrification & reduce fossil fuel use in the power sector. Constraining transmission growth severely limits the expansion of wind & solar power.
4. If electricity transmission cannot be expanded fast enough, power sector emissions & associated pollution & health impacts could increase significantly as gas ^ coal-fired power plants produce more to meet growing demand from electric vehicles and other electrification.
5. If transmission cannot be expanded faster than recent historical rates, growing demand from EVs and electrification drives over 110 million tons of additional coal consumption in 2030 vs No IRA case & roughly 250 Mt more than if transmission expansion is unconstrained.
6. Expanding transmission more rapidly enables growth of wind & solar and reduces natural gas consumption 17% vs 2021 levels. In contrast, if transmission expansion is limited to 1%/year, natural gas use increases to 4% above 2021 levels in 2030 and remains elevated through 2035.
In sum, hundreds of millions of tons per year of greenhouse gas emissions and our ability to drive down coal & natural gas use + associated pollution are contingent on our ability to accelerate the expansion of electricity transmission & deploy renewable electricity at scale.
For more, read the full report repeatproject.org/reports

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Jesse D. Jenkins

Jesse D. Jenkins Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @JesseJenkins

Jul 3
The House is voting to pass the One Big "Beautiful" Bill right now. Here's six key takeaways on what passage means for U.S. energy costs, investment in new electricity supplies, and greenhouse gas emissions. #OBBB Image
1. The One Big "Beautiful" Bill raises U.S. household and business energy expenditures by $28 billion annually in 2030 and over $50 billion in 2035.
#OBBB Image
2. The One Big "Beautiful" Bill increases average U.S. household energy costs by roughly $165 per household per year in 2030 and over $280 per household per year in 2035—an increase of about 7.5% in 2030 and over 13% in 2035.
#OBBB Image
Read 9 tweets
Jul 2
REPEAT Project just completed our rapid analysis of the impacts of the Senate-passed version of the One Big "Beautiful" Bill (#OBBB), which the House is considering now, on the US energy sector and emissions. Still working up full report, but here is a sneak peak... 🧵 Image
Compared to what Trump can do via executive action alone, if the Senate-passed #OBBB becomes law:
1. US greenhouse gas emissions would increase by ~190 million metric tons per year in 2030 & 470 million tons in 2035 Image
Image
Compared to what Trump can do via executive action alone, if the Senate-passed #OBBB becomes law:
2. US households & businesses will spend $28 billion more on energy annually in 2030 and $52 billion more in 2035.
3. The average US household will pay ~$165 more per year on energy bills in 2030 and over $280 per year in 2035.Image
Image
Read 7 tweets
Jun 28
This is unbelievably bad. I am astonished that the Senate language got WORSE overnight than even the House version. This One Big Horrible Bill will raise energy costs, kill $100s of billions of new investment in energy & manufacturing, make our grid less reliable, increase pollution, and constrain our ability to compete with China for the future or AI. Total loser stuff.
The new Senate draft raises taxes on all wind and solar projects that haven't begun construction today unless they are placed service by end of 2027 and navigate complex, likely unworkable requirements to prove they don't use a drop of Chinese materials. After that, this bill ADDS A NEW tax on wind and solar projects that can't prove the same.
Oh & it does so while killing the tax credits to support domestic manufacturing of wind components at the end of 2027 & adding the same unworkable requirements to the credits supporting US solar & critical minerals. It'll murder our nascent clean energy manufacturing sectors.
Read 5 tweets
Jan 31
Everyone seems to be framing Trump's freeze on federal grants as a Constitutional fight over powers of the purse & whether presidents can disregard Congressional appropriations. It is that. But also at stake is the fundamental validity of govt contracts! I see much less discussion on this... 🧵
Trump isnt just trying to impound appropriated but unobligated funding. He's frozen dispersement of billions of dollars of CONTRACTUALLY OBLIGATED funds. Whatever you think about the validity of impounding unobligated funds, this is quite clearly a direct and widespread violation of contract law. 🧵
While the courts forced Trump's OMB to revoke its across-the-board freeze on ALL federal assistance (grants, loans etc), the White House continues to forbid dispersment of obligated funds for various programs they just dont like, including clean energy, anything that smells of DEI, foreign aid etc 🧵
Read 7 tweets
Oct 2, 2024
Vance last night: "We should be making more solar panels here in the United States of America."
Me last night yelling at the TV: THAT IS EXACTLY WHAT AMERICA IS DOING UNDER THE BIDEN-HARRIS ADMINISTRATION (AND EVERY SINGLE REPUBLICAN VOTED AGAINST THE LAW THAT MADE IT HAPPEN)!!
And it's not just solar panel manufacturing. After decades of politicians like Vance making empty promises to bring manufacturing back to America, WE'RE ACTUALLY DOING IT! Thanks to clean energy & industrial policy laws passed under Biden & Harris.

Image
Image
Just last week, Ohio-based solar PV manufacturer @FirstSolar inaugurated a new $1.1 billion manufacturing facility in Alabama that adds 3.5 gigawatts of fully vertically integrated solar manufacturing capacity in the US. That's ~10% of the US market for solar. madeinalabama.com/2024/09/first-…
Read 8 tweets
Aug 16, 2024
Two years ago today, President Biden signed into the law the landmark Inflation Reducation Act, supercharging the clean energy transition.
Today, REPEAT Project releases 'Climate Progress 2024,' our annual update and analysis of US progress on the path to net-zero emissions.Image
Image
In this 2024 update, we've thoroughly refreshed all assumptions, calibrated near-term constraints against real-world trends & announced investments, and accounted for several federal regulations (EPA emissions rules & DOE efficiency standards) finalized by in the last year. Image
In todays' Summary Report (available at ), we provide high level results from REPEAT Project’s 2024 Annual U.S. Emissions Pathways Update.
A final report with further detailed findings and an updated data portal with quantitative results will be published soon at .repeatproject.org/reports
repeatproject.org
Read 13 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(