JesseJenkins Profile picture
Sep 22 15 tweets 7 min read
NEW REPEATProject.org analysis out on the importance of electricity transmission expansion to unlock the full emissions reduction potential (& health benefits) of the #InflationReductionAct: repeatproject.org/docs/REPEAT_IR…
Read on to learn why 100s of millions of tons are at stake.
First, this report does NOT model the impacts of the proposed 'permitting reform' bill being debated now. We began this work soon after finishing our analysis of IRA (repeatproject.org/docs/REPEAT_IR…) because expanding clean electricity is THE linchpin driving emissions cuts under IRA.
Previously, REPEAT Project estimated that IRA could cut U.S. greenhouse gas emissions by roughly one billion tons per year in 2030 and reduce cumulative greenhouse gas emissions by 6.3 billion tons of CO2-equivalent over the decade (2023-2032).
BUT, that outcome depends on more than doubling the historical pace of electricity transmission expansion over the last decade in order to interconnect new renewable resources at sufficient pace and meet growing demand from electric vehicles, heat pumps, & other electrification.
To meet growing demand for electricity, which we estimate could rise by ~24% by 2030 & ~43% by 2035, AND drive down power sector emissions and coal & gas use, we are going to need a bigger grid. Our original IRA analysis envisions 2.3%/year avg expansion of high-voltage capacity.
That pace is >2x the ~1%/yr rate over the past decade and slightly faster than the ~2%/year average expansion rate from 1978-2020 (credit Michael Cembalest: assets.jpmprivatebank.com/content/dam/jp…).
So this study explores alternative scenarios that constrain transmission to 1%, 1.5% & 2%/yr.
Findings:
1. Failing to accelerate transmission expansion beyond the recent historical pace (~1%/yr) increases 2030 GHG by ~800 million tons relative to estimated reductions in an unconstrained IRA case. Emissions are 200 Mt higher if transmission growth is limited to 1.5%/year.
2. Over 80% of the potential emissions reductions delivered by IRA in 2030 are lost if transmission expansion is constrained to 1%/year, and roughly 25% are lost if growth is limited to 1.5%/year.
3. To achieve IRA’s full emissions reduction potential, new clean electricity must be rapidly added to both meet growing demand from electrification & reduce fossil fuel use in the power sector. Constraining transmission growth severely limits the expansion of wind & solar power.
4. If electricity transmission cannot be expanded fast enough, power sector emissions & associated pollution & health impacts could increase significantly as gas ^ coal-fired power plants produce more to meet growing demand from electric vehicles and other electrification.
5. If transmission cannot be expanded faster than recent historical rates, growing demand from EVs and electrification drives over 110 million tons of additional coal consumption in 2030 vs No IRA case & roughly 250 Mt more than if transmission expansion is unconstrained.
6. Expanding transmission more rapidly enables growth of wind & solar and reduces natural gas consumption 17% vs 2021 levels. In contrast, if transmission expansion is limited to 1%/year, natural gas use increases to 4% above 2021 levels in 2030 and remains elevated through 2035.
In sum, hundreds of millions of tons per year of greenhouse gas emissions and our ability to drive down coal & natural gas use + associated pollution are contingent on our ability to accelerate the expansion of electricity transmission & deploy renewable electricity at scale.
For more, read the full report repeatproject.org/reports

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with JesseJenkins

JesseJenkins Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @JesseJenkins

Sep 23
There's some good, bad & ugly provisions in Manchin's permitting reform bill (more here ).
Probably the ugliest is approval of the Mountain Valley Pipeline (MVP). I've been asked several times how to weigh climate/GHG impacts of this provision. Here's a 🧵 Image
First, climate is NOT the only lens that matters here. Approving MVP is opposed by many local communities impacted by the project (vpm.org/news/articles/…), and Congress approving specific projects and preventing Judicial review is a stark example of procedural injustice.
Executive agencies & courts should determine project siting decisions, NOT Congress. Explicitly denying ability for courts to review the MVP decision is also terrible precedent. Is that even Constitutional? Seems to violate separation of powers. This all has to be weighed too.
Read 19 tweets
Sep 21
Here's the permitting reform bill text & summary.

The key win for climate is new federal (FERC) siting & cost allocation authority for electricity transmission, which is key to unlocking renewables & cutting emissions (plus lowering electricity costs & improving grid resilience)
Since releasing our IRA report, REPEAT Project has been modeling constraints on the pace of transmission expansion & impacts on emissions & energy outcomes under IRA for several weeks. It's a key bottleneck we have to tackle to enable full potential of the Inflation Reduction Act
We're aiming to get those results out tomorrow. Clearly they just got even more relevant.

Stay tuned...

I'll also be reading the full text and trying to weigh out the implications for climate asap.
Read 4 tweets
Sep 6
Summary of Germany/EU proposal to capture excess profits from electricity markets (where prices are bonkers!) and transfer them to consumers to lower bills. It's well structured to preserve efficient dispatch, including full strength signals for demand curtailment, which is key.
This is a lot better than proposals to split markets or impose market price caps. It preserves spot markets & scarcity pricing, which is key, but achieves the key goal of transferring windfall profits from non-gas consuming generators and returning to customers to lower bills.
Confiscating rents is always dicey & can have knock-on effects on future decisions, but the crisis in Europe is going to last & seems to demand it. Seems viable to me.
What about y'all?

CC @LionHirth @CarlosBatIIe @MichaelGrubb9 @jacob_mays @WildeEcon @BorensteinS @KnittelMIT?
Read 4 tweets
Sep 4
Notable: Car & Driver's latest issue is devoted to the 2022 EV of the Year, with 20 models reviewed (and the Hyundai Ioniq 5 winning out).

Also notable is a fun fact on the hulking GMC Hummer EV's consumption of about 400 pounds of Lithium carbonate. But how does that compare...
...the consumption of gasoline by a conventional Hummer?

That 400 lbs of Lithium carbonate can make a battery that powers the Hummer EV for 100,000+ miles.

400 lbs of gasoline would fuel the 2010 Hummer H3T at ~15 mpg for...

...950 miles.
Yes, EVs use materials mined and extracted from the Earth.

Yes, extracting a pound of oil and a pound of Lithium is apples to oranges.

Yet the scale of resource extraction to support an internal combustion engine vehicle is staggeringly, orders of magnitude larger than an EV.
Read 4 tweets
Sep 4
Interconnection ?: shouldnt wind, solar, storage projects be able to opt for quicker interconnection & pay only for "shallow" costs (eg substation & spur line) and then incur curtailment risk if RTO find it necessary to preserve reliability, in lieu of deep interconnection study?
Broader grid reinforcements usually have broader system benefits too, so cost should be allocated to all beneficiaries, not just interconnecting generators, and such reinforcements can be made after interconnection if justified by benefits.
This would make interconnection queue much faster, no?

Is this already standard practice in some RTO regions?

I believe it is an option in the UK (and managing curtailment became a major market opportunity for aggregators like Smarter Grid Solutions)
Read 5 tweets
Aug 24
File under T for TIPPING POINTS!

California to Ban the Sale of New Gasoline Cars by 2035 👀 nyti.ms/3Kp3p7l

When we said IRA would spur states (and everyone else!) to do more, we weren't joking...
"It sets interim targets requiring that 35 percent of new passenger vehicles sold in the state by 2026 produce zero emissions. That would climb to 68 percent by 2030."
"The restrictions are important because not only is California the largest auto market in the United States, but more than a dozen other states typically follow California’s lead when setting their own auto emissions standards."
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(