Malcolm Clark Profile picture
Sep 23, 2022 26 tweets 7 min read Read on X
1./ Puberty Blockers. If you're wondering how cancer drugs used to chemically castrate offenders became a globally recommended treatment for vulnerable teenagers...wonder no more. A new paper by Dr Michael Biggs dissects the scandal. And it's a shocker.👇
tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.108…
2./ Biggs traces the 30 year long story of how a tiny experiment in Holland morphed into the 'Dutch Protocol', a treatment regimen that's helped make thousands of kids infertile but which is backed by leading science bodies and journals like the Lancet.👇
thelancet.com/journals/lanch…
3./ Like most reasonable folks you'd imagine if the Endocrine Society, the American Academy of Pediatrics the BMA and other medics have signed off on treating kids with blockers there must be really good evidence. Unfortunately, you'd be wrong. Here's how bad the evidence is.👉
4./ Biggs' story begins in Utrecht in the early 90s when Peggy Cohen-Kettenis referred 16 and 17 year olds for cross-sex hormones. Before that only 18+s could be referred. She'd become convinced the earlier someone transitioned the happier they'd be. But her evidence was scant.
5./ It was based on a study of only 22 people who transitioned in their 20s compared to some who'd done it when older. They seemed better adjusted but as Biggs points out that might have been because in the 90s social attitudes were less negative than they'd been in the 70s.🤷‍♂️ Image
6./ It also doesn't follow that because someone in their 20s was happier than someone who'd transitioned in their 50s, teenagers would be even happier. Remarkably, Cohen-Kettenis never followed up her group of 22 to find out what eventually happened. The first of many lapses.
7./ This lack of curiosity stemmed from the Dutch team's passionate shared world view. Cohen-Kettenis's collaborator Louis Gooren claimed, for example, to have shown transwomen's brains were closer to women's than men's. In 30 years no one's been able to replicate this work.👇
8./ Gooren studied under John Money and he shared his belief that trans identity had some biological explanation. In an interview he argued if the problem is biological then so must the solution be. This conviction led inexorably to puberty blockers.
9./ Gooren's brain work was unreproducible so rather worthless, yet it was cited when the Endocrine Society backed puberty blockers. Its guidelines were updated by Dr Joshua Safer. Here he is admitting the paper was "weak evidence" but "pretty pictures".👇
10./ By 1994, despite having run no proper trials of blockers the Dutch began prescribing them to some under 16s. Biggs has discovered Gooren did this even when a child's psychiatrist disagreed. Cohen-Kettenis claimed, "the adolescent ..knows pretty well what she or he is doing.” Image
11./ In 1996 a show for Channel 4 took 3 English kids to Holland to discover what it described as "transgender medicine at its most advanced". The same year Cohen-Kettenis participated in a major conference at the Tavistock in London, written up in 'Stranger in My Own Body'.👇 Image
12./ The foreword was written by John Money, who was not yet discredited for his sexually abusive treatment of children and his scientific fraud. Cohen-Kettenis, had written "the bravest chapter" he declared, backing "early hormonal intervention" in adolescents. Image
13./ The Dutch maintained that blockers were reversible but did no research to prove it. In 2006 when Cohen-Kettenis published a manifesto advocating blockers she admitted,"It is not clear yet how pubertal suppression will influence brain development." Hey, it's only the brain.
14./ The world soon climbed on board the Dutch bandwagon. In 2001 puberty suppression was urged by WPATH despite evidence on only a handful of patients. Come the moment. Come the man. Dr Norman Spack, began evangelising for blockers, admitting to "salivating" about their use.
15./ In lectures Spack used a sexualised photograph of twins, one a boy going through puberty and the other of his "sister" with her direct gaze into the camera, charming head tilt and hint of decolletage. Spack describes "her" need to be saved from male puberty as urgent. Okay.
16./ Male puberty is not a disaster. No puberty is. When the Tavistock refused to fast-track puberty suppression Spack was invited to a conference in London in 2005 organised by @giresuk where he and Cohen-Kettenis put its clinicians under enormous pressure to comply.
17./ Spack, GIRES and Cohen-Kettenis argued if the Tavistock did not embrace routine prescription of puberty blockers they risked young people committing suicide, despite the fact evidence on suicide among young gender non conforming kids doesn't support this claim at all.
18./ In 2010 the Tavi agreed to begin a trial of blockers. Without warning it then adopted the Dutch approach. It took 9 years and huge pressure for it to reveal shocking results: blockers hadn't alleviated gender dysphoria. They often made it worse.
bbc.co.uk/news/uk-552821…
19./ That's because most evidence suggests for the vast majority of teens, gender dysphoria dissipates after they go through puberty. Far from freeing kids to have time to think....blockers appear to trap them in the painful anxiety they feel about their body and their sex.
20./ Blockers were sold by the Dutch Protocol as an opportunity to pause. We now know 99% of those on blockers go on to cross sex hormones. If real *thinking* was happening...the figure could not possibly be that high. Blockers are effectively a fast track to medical transition.
21./ What's also become clear is the vast majority of teens referred to gender clinics are gay. It's easy to forget when the Protocol was developed in the 90s homophobia was rife. 'Stranger in My Own Body' treats homosexuality as problematic and related to being trans.👇 Image
22./ This was known from the start of the Dutch Protocol. When Gooren was asked about sexuality he said two thirds of transwomen were attracted to men. Almost all transmen were attracted to females. "And they always bring attractive women to the clinic". Uh huh.
23./ When he retired Louis Gooren moved to Chiang Mai in Thailand to continue his err...humanitarian research. Like Cohen-Kettenis, Polly Carmichael and even Spack he no doubt thought he was doing the right thing. The result of the Dutch Protocol has been disastrous.
24./ Thousands of troubled gender non conforming teens have been fast-tracked to infertility and a lifetime of painful medical interventions. We'll never know how many were really "trans" and how many were just butch girls or fem boys uncomfortable with their sex and bodies.
25./ Norman Spack loved to compare transgenderism with being gay. The difference is gay people fought to escape ALL medicalisation. The Dutch Protocol promotes medicalisation of young people, while taking away psychiatric care. That's why it is the medical scandal of our time.
26./ You can read more on this and the rest of the science behind- and history of- the gender wars on my substack. Click on my bio above. 😉

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Malcolm Clark

Malcolm Clark Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @TwisterFilm

May 22
1./ My latest article explores the truth behind an incredible scandal. 3 days ago the UK government announced it will host a huge jamboree for the LGBTQ+ lobby next year. As if that's not bad enough it will also hand over £21M to insane LGBTQ+ organisations. What's going on? 👉 Image
2./ I argue this £21M is the price Labour is willing to pay to keep the LGBTQ+ lobby onside. In 2022 I reported on how the lobby similarly tried to screw the British taxpayer out of £10M as part of a crazy 'Safe to Be Me' conference. Luckily for us the conference collapsed.👉 Image
3./ The lobby had to boycot the Conference when @KemiBadenoch refused to sign off a
Conversion Therapy ban designed to prevent gender nonconforming kids getting therapy. I revealed the 'Safe To Be Me' grift was organised by prominent Tory gays. Who's behind this latest heist? 👉 Image
Read 9 tweets
May 8
1./ 🧵In 2001 David Paulden changed his name to Zack Polanski. In my latest article I question the reasons for the choice and suggest his new name signalled contempt for his biological family, a tangled attitude towards his Jewish identity and the birth of his Messiah complex. Image
2./ Polanski claims his new surname pays homage to his ancestors. Yet he offers wildly contradictory accounts of their lives and has shown no interest in finding out the truth. Stranger still was his decision to change his first name to that of this fictional 8 year old boy . 👇 Image
3./ Zacharias (Zach) Wrench is a character from 'Goodnight Mister Tom' a children's book the LGBTQ+ lobby adores because it celebrates the 'chosen family' over the biological equivalent. Zach forms an intense relationship with a broken and troubled boy called William.👇
Read 7 tweets
Apr 29
1./ 🧵The story of Lord Ahmed reveals startling similarities between Muslim activism and the trans lobby. Both play the victim, make hyperbolic claims about hate crime and refuse to take abuse seriously. Ahmed is a serial offender yet hobnobs with the Muslim elite. 👉
1/of 17 Image
2./ Earlier this month the Sunday Times revealed Ahmed played a starring role at a high-profile event for Pakistani-Brits where he sat alongside a Labour MP. It didn't seem to matter Ahmed had been jailed twice; once for buggering an 11 year old boy.
thetimes.com/uk/politics/ar…
3./ Afzal Khan MP is a champion of Islamophobia Awareness Month. Perhaps if he spent less time with a convicted sex offender there would be less "Islamophobia". As for Ahmed, he perfectly illustrates how Muslim agitators use allegations of bigotry to try to deflect criticism. Image
Read 17 tweets
Apr 11
1./ Labour's Pakistani Problem. The Times reports a Labour MP took part in an event with convicted child abuser Lord Ahmed. Why is this such political dynamite? Ahmed was the first Pakistani councillor in Rotherham; infamous for its 'grooming' gangs
1of/11
thetimes.com/uk/politics/ar…
2./ In 2022 Ahmed was convicted of raping an 11 year old boy and an under age girl. The fact Ahmed was a teenager at the time (in the 1970s) helped reduce his sentence on appeal. But here's the thing: Ahmed had accomplices when he raped these two kids. 👉
bbc.co.uk/news/uk-englan…
3./ Ahmed's two older brothers were "deemed unfit to stand trial" (conveniently) yet the jury made clear it believed they'd also taken part in what were effectively gang rapes. Can it be any wonder Pakistani politicians in Rotherham refused to take 'grooming' gangs seriously? Image
Read 11 tweets
Mar 31
1./ 🧵 Why did the SNP ignore the crimes of Jordan Linden who has been convicted of sex offences against young men and boys? In my latest article I dissect the culture of a party that led gay predators to believe they had a free pass.
Click on link in my bio to read.👆
1/of 7. Image
2./ After gay marriage was passed the SNP was so desperate to convince gay men the party was their natural home its culture changed. Soon it began to resemble that of a sleazy gay bar, complete with innuendo, boozing and misogynist drag queens performing at SNP events. Image
3./ After Derek Mackay was fired for harassing a 16 year old boy it was revealed Nicola Sturgeon had banned him from drinking at Conference. When drunk he tended to grope men. Shame she didn't stop him going on school visits which is how he met that 16 year old boy. Image
Read 7 tweets
Feb 12
1./ 🧵My latest article explores the scientists Jeffrey Epstein gathered around himself including Stephen Hawking and Lawrence Krauss. I also reveal new discoveries about the bizarre event that has come to define Epstein's misuse of science to launder his reputation.👉
1/of11 Image
2./ In March 2006, 22 top physicists flew into the US Virgin Islands to discuss the mysteries of the Universe. This was fortuitous for Epstein. A year before Florida cops had begun investigating him. 3 weeks before the boffins arrived he was indicted for rape of a 14 year old. Image
3./ Cecile de Jongh, the Epstein Foundation's Director insisted the conference would have a focus on education. Physicists would visit high schools and schoolkids were invited to the opening reception. Cecile happened to be the wife of the Governor of the US Virgin Islands. 🤔 Image
Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(