Declaring mobilization was a risky gamble that may lead to Putin’s demise. But not because it is unpopular with the public.
Mobilization set up for failure the hardliners within Putin’s inner circle, the very group that had clamored for it. Once it fails to turn the war around, they will face a choice between taking the fall or turning against their leader.
In order to stay in power, any leader, even Putin must maintain the support of some proportion of the constituents. For autocratic leaders, like Putin, this means securing continued support of his inner circle, whether through policy, private payoffs.
Putin’s inner circle consists of two rival blocs: the heads of the military/security structures and the top-ranking intelligence officers (the FSB).
The hardliners (the military) who called for mobilization are short-sighted. They see the best-case scenario in which the over-whelming troop numbers force Ukraine to accept peace of Russia’s terms.
In this fantasy, the military is the heroes, unstoppable but by the weight of their new medals. What they are forgetting is that nothing in this was has gone according to Russia’s best-case scenario.
The reality is that Russia lacks the logistics and officer personnel to manage the army of its current size. Quadrupling the troop numbers, as the promised 300,000 would mean, would exponentially exacerbate these problems.
And when the generals’ dreams of glory come crashing down, the FSB (their rival bloc) will be there to make sure none of todays’ hardliners ever climb from under the rubble.
Putin can see this coming. There is a reason he postponed mobilization for as long as he could. He waited so long that some of the hardliners (Kadyrov, Prigozhin) found the courage to publicly call him out for it.
Even once his speech was scheduled to air, Putin postponed the announcement for yet another day at the last minute. He didn’t want mobilization, his hand was forced.
Putin knows that a likely defeat will sow panic among the members of his inner circle. And when narcissists panic, they destroy everything around them.
It’s Putin’s side of the bargain to ensure the safety of his inner circle, and he did this by postponing escalating his “special operation” to a full-scale war for as long as he could.
Now that all the military’s cards have been played, it’s only a matter of time before they have to choose between taking the fall or turning on their leader.
This is what my @guardian op-ed says, the title they chose focuses on the military aspect, but not the main tension in the inner circle.

theguardian.com/commentisfree/…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Professor Olga Chyzh

Professor Olga Chyzh Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @olga_chyzh

Aug 13
About the visa ban proposal: If the goal is to implement a policy that would punish the supporters of Putin’s regime, rather than just lashing out, then there are several points to consider. #StandWithUkraine
Putin’s supporters (other than the oligarchs) vacation in Sochi and Crimea, not in Europe. On the other hand, an overwhelming majority of Russians, who do vacation in Europe, do not support Putin or the war. In fact, these Russians hate Putin second most, after Ukrainians.
These Russians—and there are tens of millions of them—are in fact Ukraine’s biggest sympathizers. A travel ban will lower these people’s quality of life, but how does this help Ukraine?
Read 11 tweets
Aug 9
The significance of today’s attacks in Crimea is so much more than destroying Russian air cover for the battle for Kherson. That the US signed off on Ukraine striking a target in Crimea is a major game-changer in this war.
Whereas it previously looked like Crimea was off-limits, today’s attacks showed that may not be the case. It’s too early to tell whether this was an isolated incident—perhaps Ukraine made a case that destroying this airfield was tactically crucial for taking back Kherson.
But if Crimea is actually on the table, if the US is on board with Ukraine taking it back, that changes everything. Not just for Ukraine. For Putin and his hold on power.
Read 19 tweets
May 20
It’s natural to be worried about the threat of a nuclear war, especially with all the rhetoric coming out of Russia. Here is some analysis from the perspective of research on authoritarian regimes, war outcomes, and international bargaining.
The bottom line is that the threat of nuclear escalation is low, no matter how this war ends for Russia.
Putin is NOT cornered. He does NOT need an offramp to save face. He is NOT going to lash out and nuke the world—even if Ukrainian forces kick his troops all the way out of Ukraine, including Donbas and Crimea.
Read 21 tweets
Apr 21
A suicide epidemic among Russian gas oligarchs? 1/4

April 20, 2022--Vladislav Avayev, former Vice President for Gazprombank, allegedly shot his wife and daughter, then himself.
skynews.com.au/australia-news…
April 19, 2022--Sergey Protosenya, former deputy chairman of Russian gas giant Novatek, found hanged at his house, his wife and daughter dead of stab wounds.
newsweek.com/russian-oligar…
February, 25, 2022-- Alexander Tyulyakov, top-level manager of Gazprom, found hanged in his garage
ruscrime.com/politics/what-…
Read 4 tweets
Apr 9
Why do so many Russian-speakers support Putin and this war? Still. Even in Ukraine (though their number is declining). And in other former satellites, or even Canada and the US. Why? How? WHY?

It’s not just the Kremlin propaganda. Let me tell you a deeply personal story. 1/n
When Russian missiles hit my hometown of Odesa on Feb 24, my mom jumped on the first bus out of the country. Her obvious destination was Moldova—because of geographical proximity, but also, because our family lived there until 1995 when we moved to Ukraine.
My mom has a network of friends there—Russian-speakers who, unlike our family, still live in Moldova. From the bus, she called her old friend—I’ll call her Tanya—who still lives in Moldova, and asked if she could spend the night—she could only find a hotel room for the day after.
Read 19 tweets
Mar 24
Why Russia and Ukraine CANNOT reach a stable peaceful settlement. #PutinsWar will go on as long as the very last soldier is standing. The reason is that every point of negotiation is plagued with commitment problems. 1/n
#StopPutin #StandWithUkraine
I previously explained that the cause of this war is an information failure.
The reason why a mutually respected peaceful settlement between Russia and Ukraine is NOT possible is what political scientists call a commitment problem.
Read 23 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(