Michael Mauboussin's 2014 paper on Calculating ROIC is an excellent guide to just about everything you need to know about this important metric and how to make sense of it. Here are my summary notes from reading it:
ROIC is a key indicator of a company's ability to create value, its competitive advantages and capital efficiency. What's important is: 1) the absolute spread between the ROIC and the WACC, and 2) how much capital can be deployed at that spread (reinvestment rate)
ROIC = NOPAT / Invested Capital (IC)
where NOPAT = EBIT - Cash taxes (ie. cash earnings before financing)
IC can be thought of in two ways: 1) the net assets a company needs to operate 2) the amount of financing a company's capital holders need to supply to fund the net assets
There are a few practical issues however.
Firstly - excess cash.
He argues you should exclude excess cash and only consider the cash a company needs to operate. This ensures separation between the operating efficiency of the biz and capital allocation decisions (buybacks etc)
I think this makes sense in theory however in practice it becomes quite subjective - what you consider to be excess cash? Think about all the large tech companies and the big cash piles they are sitting on. He provides some guidelines below:
Next is goodwill. If there's been M&A then the goodwill on the BS may have a large impact on IC & ROIC as shown in the Cisco example below. If you don’t expect many large deals going fwd, then the operating ROIC (ex-goodwill) may provide a better picture of incremental returns
If you expect the company to be acquisitive, then the fully loaded ROIC incl goodwill may be more relevant, however there is more complexity here because as outlined in his note below, ROIC isn’t a good way to assess M&A (too low initially, too high in later years)
What matters actually is not just the absolute ROIC but the change in ROIC – Return on Incremental Capital (ROIIC), as this gives a sense of incremental return on new investments and the direction that the overall ROIC is trending
Due to the volatility in annual ROIIC, it may make sense to calculate ROIIC on a rolling 3-5 year basis, as shown in the Cisco example below
ROIC can help shed light on a company’s competitive advantages and strategy. There are broadly two sources of competitive advantage:
- Consumer advantage: habits, high switching costs, search costs etc
- Production advantage: scale and cost advantage, access to inputs, IP etc
By breaking down ROIC into its two components - NOPAT margin and capital turnover - we can glean insights into a company’s competitive advantages:
For example, a business that has a high ROIC due to a low margin but a high sales/capital turnover, like a low cost retailer, probably has some key advantages on the production side which should be analysed
A business that has a high ROIC due to a high margin but low sales turnover, like a luxury brand, probably has some key advantages on the consumer side which should be analysed
The below chart summarises these relationships:
Finally, ROIC is a key driver of valuation, something that is often forgotten when ascribing multiples to a business:
Very interesting data from Jefferies showing CPU and GPU instance share in the top cloud providers. Haven't come across this level of granularity before $NVDA $AMD $INTC
CPUs - clear trend of AMD taking share from Intel, but also AWS's Graviton being pushed strongly as well
Nvidia unsurprisingly dominates accelerator instances with over 80% share across all cloud providers, however interesting how much AWS is pushing its inferentia chip for inferencing workloads
Which means that Nvidia's share of AWS accelerated instances is falling and is the lowest amongst all the cloud providers (though still ~70%). Similar marginal share erosion happening at GCP with Google's TPUs, but to a lesser extent
$SE Overall a decent result given all the headwinds and tough comps. Some updated charts and KPIs that I track below along with some commentary:
Shopee GMV sequential decline was well expected by now but still 38% growth yoy and 64% rev yoy was a bit better than I expected. Take-rates flat qoq but these should see a nice increase next quarter as commissions have been raised across the board in the last few months
Good to see S&M per order reached its lowest level ever this quarter, although if i had to nickpick at anything it's the large increase in HQ costs which offset that somewhat, which meant total loss per order of $0.40 was largely flat.
The TLDR for those who want to cut straight to the summary at the end.
Feedback welcome as always.
The next article will cover Nvidia's expansion beyond the GPU, its software layer and full-stack computing approach, and competitive landscape.
If you enjoyed this, a retweet or a share would be greatly appreciated
$SE In my Garena deep dive last yr I used data from activeplayer.io to look at the popularity of FF & its peers. It estimates live players by scraping various sources. Here is the updated data on a time series basis. Interesting how well it correlates to bookings
Active players generally grew well over 1H'21 and then started falling, which ties to the slowdown/decline in bookings we saw in the Q3/Q4 results. Player numbers kept falling in the first 3m of this yr. PUBG and Fortnite are also down from their peaks but not to the same extent
This also ties well to SensorTower bookings (below), which show continued moderation in the first 3m of 22. Mgmt has obv incorporated this into the 22 guide but the big q is where will things normalise beyond this yr. Right now active players are still at around the 2H'20 levels
An excellent report from Bernstein on $SE addressing the key issues weighing on the stock right now - pathway to profitability, post-COVID slowdown, Free Fire, games pipeline, Tencent, and Krafton lawsuit. I am copying extracts in this thread as the detail is worth reading
A great breakdown of unit economics for Shopee showing the pathway to profitability 1) take rates increasing but importantly the high margin items of comms+ads - currently v. low but if that can increase to 50% of take rate in the outer years, GP % may go from c.10% today to 50%
and 2) S&M needs to not blow out considerably from current level of $0.41/order (they assume $0.50 in FY26). Assuming this, they get EBIT breakeven by FY26 (I had EBITDA breakeven by FY25 in my deep dive). Important to track these KPIs to validate the biz model is working
"Alchemy" by @rorysutherland is a fantastic, thought-provoking book about the human psyche, summoning brilliant ideas in marketing and business, and viewing the world from a different, less logical, viewpoint.
Here are a couple of my favorite takeaways:
@rorysutherland Most of the biggest, most successful business ideas in the world initially defied conventional logic.
Imagine proposing some of these ideas to a group of skeptical investors:
In defense of irrationality.
Using logic will always get you to exactly the same place as your competitors. Test counterintuitive things, because no one else does. Following rogue ideas and taking risks is something that the world’s top successful entrepreneurs understand well