Strange idea to cast Alinejad, who lives in NYC, as the leader of the Iranian protests that are explicitly being done in the name of a local woman murdered by Iranian police. Alinejad is a US government employee who meets regularly with neocon politicians. newyorker.com/news/daily-com…
Alinejad's influence is all via social media (and VoA), but Filkins makes no attempt to assess her social media presence/reach. She has 509k followers on Twitter, 425k on FB, and 8m on IG (which...). No sense in the article if she's just amplifying or actually inspiring people.
This happened during other MENA protests -- large English-speaking audiences confused with influence in the home country, social media virality confused with on the ground impact, Twitter appearing omniscient rather than a pinhole view. Gotta be careful. newrepublic.com/article/112268…
Filkins quotes Alinejad, who gave herself a new first name meaning Messiah or Christ, as saying, “I’m leading this movement,” without assessing the truth of that statement or talking to anyone in Iran. newyorker.com/news/daily-com…
Alinejad adds context for the leader comment.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
"The Pentagon has ordered a sweeping audit of how it conducts clandestine information warfare after major social media companies identified and took offline fake accounts suspected of being run by the U.S. military in violation of the platforms’ rules." washingtonpost.com/national-secur…
If the organ-harvesting tweet is shown to be Centcom’s, one defense official said, it would “absolutely be a violation of doctrine and training practices.” washingtonpost.com/national-secur…
So basically: The US military is running social media influence ops with fake accounts and spreading false information. Contractors love it ($$). FB told the DoD, "Don't be so sloppy that we catch you." Few rules or oversight. washingtonpost.com/national-secur…
Someday we're going to look back on this whole Covid disaster and laugh because we'll all have 40% of our original brain matter and can barely process reality.
Jack Dorsey should be called to testify before a congressional committee about why his company has experienced so many hacks, the Saudi spy ring, his personal relationship with MBS, Twitter's operations in authoritarian states, role of security services, and influence operations.
Also crypto spam and scams and where that might intersect with Jack's own Bitcoin interests. Bots matter more as part of the conversation over influence operations I think.
Why does @jack follow Bader Al Asaker? What's the deal with Prince Alwaleed? Why does KSA still have troll farms operating on here? (And why does it seem like a number of other countries are emulating them?)
I'll be repeating this until I die: tech isn't neutral. It has built-in capacities, intended use cases. It's informed by the sociopolitical and economic conditions under which it's produced and deployed (and commercialized, as the case may be). A nuke isn't neutral, nor is crypto
"Tech isn't neutral" has been an incredibly useful ideological slogan for the tech industry to abdicate any responsibility or legal liability for the consequences of what they create.
Bitcoin isn't a "neutral" tech: it's private money, facilitates illicit finance, challenges state sovereignty over the money supply, and basically acts as a paperclip maximizer to gobble up ever more of the world's otherwise productive electrical capacity. It's political.