“History never repeats itself, but it does often rhyme.” - Mark Twain
A long thread on interest rates and the stock market, compared to #uranium prices and a stock.
The bull market of 2004-07 as compared to that of the current 2021-202? /1
The #uranium bull market of the mid 2000s was marked by a period of rising interest rates. Between 2004 and 2006, the Federal Reserve raised interest rates 17 times from 1.0% to 5.25% to curb inflation and cool off an overheated economy./2
The stock market however continued on its merry way until mid-2007 when the financial crisis started. Meanwhile inflation in the US ranged from 3%-5.5%.
During this period the S&P returned 31% from 2004 to end of 2007./3
The price of uranium, as measured by spot, headed upwards at a consistent pace. While there may have been volatility on a daily basis, on a yearly note, the trend was one way ⬆️until the peak in 2007. (Chart is from Cameco) /4
What drove the uranium price to these consistent increases were the utilities who had entered the term contract market en masse starting in 2005 to secure their needs, along with financial players such as Uranium Participation Corp (UPC)./5
While the previous data looked fairly consistent in their trend, owning a #uranium stock was very volatile, to say the least.
I selected Denison Mines to exemplify the period, as it trades today as it did then, and unlike Cameco (flooding), did not have operational issues./6
If you owned Denison shares at the start of 2004 your cost was $1.59 and the market cap was approx. $30 milion CAD. At the end of 2007 (not the peak) your shares would be worth $8.89 and the market cap was now $1.7 billion. The difference in multipliers was dilution./7
However, the path to these returns was not obvious. There was a particularly painful period (it may have seemed like this at the time) when the stock bottomed at $4.28 in the summer of 2006 after hitting previous highs of $5.15, $6.39, $8.15, and $7.35. (The peak was $16.57)./8
The ability to recognize the tops and bottoms in retrospect is always easy.
On the other hand,when considering history blended with a longer horizon, we can see the data as it stands today and consider what the future holds./9
For this purpose, I started the clock on the current #uranium bull market in 2021. Some of you may agree/disagree. My principal thought is that in Dec 2020 was when these stocks collectively took off and attracted many more investors./10
When considering interest rates in this period, the Fed kept rates very low until this year. From a rate of 0.25%, with the most recent raise increased to 3.13%. Expectations are rates to top out at 4.4% to 4.6%...or until something breaks./11
The stock market, on the other hand has gone on a spectacular round trip as measured by the S&P.
Since the start of 2021 to Friday, the market is down 3%. Sentiment is very much negative as compared to the prior uranium bull market./12
The uranium spot price continues to be consistent in its appreciation. The chart from Cameco (to August) shows a fairly consistent trajectory upward from the start. The elements are still in place for a bull run in the commodity especially on a year over year basis./13
The utilities are only now returning to the term market in size but it is still early. As noted, the return of the utilites to contracting en masse is a requirement of any uranium bull market./14
The volatility with owning a #uranium stock has not changed.
At the start of 2021 Dension's shares were trading for $0.84 and had a market cap of $570 million CAD. At Friday's close the stock was at $1.45 and had a market cap of $1.2 billion, dilution being the difference./15
Once again, owning a #uranium stock is very volatile. The stock reached multiple peaks including $2.29, a low $0.79, before hitting $2.64 last fall.
2022 so far has been a series of ups and downs in excess of $1.00, in a range between $2.32 and $1.18./16
I would be remiss if I did not mention the impact of SPUT/YCA. In the prior bull market UPC (predecessor to SPUT) acquired 4.2 million lbs by the end of 2007.
In comparison, the combination of SPUT/YCA & UPC prior to SPUT's acquisition, acquired 52.1 million lbs in 2021-22./17
When looking at history, the similarities between the two periods are close but there are two glaring differences I noted.
The stock market sentiment is very negative at this point.
The uranium bull market is nowhere near its end./18
Interest rates on their own do not have a direct impact on the commodity.
Investor sentiment goes through extremes of optimism and pessimism, but #uranium stock valuations remain elevated in comparison to the market due to the #uranium fundamentals that matter much more./End
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Looking at this chart, and anecdotes shared on X and interviews from those attending nuclear fuel conferences, one can get the impression that Western utilities are covered in the immediate and that a crisis is more a late 2020s or 2030s issue. But is that the case?/3
A thread on enrichment and its impact on #uranium demand.
This will be a long one referencing my analysis on Urenco and what I see happening in the enrichment market.
Please read the attached images to better understand what is happening./1
I recently posted that Urenco announced a record high order book for its conversion services at the end of 2024 and this would lead to significant #uranium contracting.
In the 2010s Urenco was working through contracts, or order book as they call it, from the prior #uranium bull market through at least 2017. They noted this in their annual report of that same year. It is noteworthy that they can live off of peak demand for a very long time./3
#Uranium industry participants and investors have noted that utilities have been securing both enrichment and conversion services first, before signing #uranium contracts.
With Urenco's data we now have clear evidence that a wave of uranium term contracts is coming.
A short 🧵
To understand, I note that in the previous bull market term contracting started above replacement rate in 2005. This continued until 2012 when it was disrupted by Fukushima and shutdowns. In the 12 years that followed, utilities have not exceeded the replacement rate level./2
However, in the previous bull market, they were signing #uranium term contracts before they signed conversion contracts. The concern, or fear, was securing uranium supply. The peak for enrichment contracts was 2010./3
If you are invested in #uranium and have not done so, I highly recommend this interview by @antonioresource and John Ciampaglia of Sprott.
There are a few items I would like to add. Grab a coffee, this will be a long thread on #uranium/1
I would like to start by acknowledging that no one can predict the short term movements in the price of spot uranium with accuracy. We do not know the date when euphoria will return it to $106, as in the spring, or whether $80 is the absolute bottom today./2
It appears that 2024 is a pivotal year for uranium fuel buyers. In the interview John C. points out the sticker shock experienced by these buyers as they saw the price double from last year. I will try to explain why 2024 has turned into such a defining year./3
Some thoughts on Global Atomic's $GLO $GLATF announcement today regarding a private placement for $15 million. I think everyone knows what will happen to the share price in the short term, but I would like to focus on what happens after. A 🧵/1
If we look at Global's spending we note that in Q1/2024 they used up $15.8 million, with $11.8 on equipment and development of Dasa. They had $18.6 million cash remaining at qtr end, but no doubt have used up the funds and require a raise to maintain their development schedule./2
Perhaps they waited too long in the belief that the stock would get a positive re-rating with news of credit committee approval, but that did not happen, and the stock turned down about 25% on news of another delay./3