In light of the ongoing conversation around Mark Rivera's sexual abuse of minors, at times I've heard people suggest it's implausible the abuse could happen as alleged, because it couldn't have happened in plain sight or in group settings.
(Note: some allegations refer to isolated situations as well – you can read several accounts through ACNAtoo, or if you've been forbidden to read things there, you can read survivor accounts through Religion News Service's reporting).
This has bothered me for a number of reasons, but it's not enough to just say "it's entirely plausible", so I've been researching and learning more about how abuse can indeed happen in plain sight.
Did you know only 4% of minor allegations are *false*? That's a staggeringly small percentage that should prompt us to learn more so as to SUPPORT courageous minors who DO find the courage to speak up (so many do not).
I hope some of the linked resources are helpful to those who still have "ears to hear" and "eyes to see". It's not easy to engage with, hence the trigger warning (I've been gathering articles for the better part of this month and have just found the bandwidth to stomach them).
And I'll start by including myself here, on two counts:
1) Even though I've taken care of children since I was 11, including camp counseling for 4 years, substitute teaching elementary school, leading Sunday School for 7 years, and being the first person fully trained in Child Protection Training at Rez,...
...I can't recall being educated much about grooming patterns.
Some of that is the level of awareness in the culture 20-30 years ago...some of it is just a miss for all those organizations.
I'm not blaming anyone for the lack of education, I'm simply offering that even now, at 42, I've had a lot to learn about what to look for and what is cause for concern. It's okay if you find yourself in that boat too. Learning more now is better than not learning.
2) In terms of the brazenness to groom in plain sight (which then often leads to abuse), I'll share that when Mark Rivera and I were involved with Bird & Baby Theater, he made a sexually inappropriate comment to me about my body.
I was 30. It was in a group setting. Others sitting at the same table blew it off/laughed it off/pushed past it because no one knew what to do. I remember sitting there, a bit shocked, & debating "how big a deal to make" (as I have each & every time I've experienced harassment).
No one wants to blow something out of proportion and sometimes there are just men who are still boys, making careless remarks in search of a laugh. Other times, you have a definite predator on your hands.
In the moment, I let it go – but I followed up with a couple friends after, people who knew Mark better than I did, who were there that night, to gauge how concerned/wary I should be around him. They downplayed it, basically because "Mark is Mark", so I continued to let it go.
But something in me knew what Mark said was wrong and creepy and without question crossed a boundary.
So how much does it reveal that when a 30 year old woman, with a good backbone and sense of self, questions her own gut...how much steeper a climb is it for a minor, A MINOR, to not question themselves and to call a spade a spade?
I think back to the person who told me earlier this year that Mark, "may be immature, but he's not a child abuser". They heard that from others at Rez. It's a convenient lie still circulating among some in the community and it's dangerous.
Grooming behaviors are sneaky and they matter. Seeing them as precursors to abuse is critically important to the minors in our midst and under our care. And abuse, devastatingly, can indeed happen in plain sight. Abusers are just. that. calculating.
The plain-as-the-nose-on-your-face example would be the Larry Nassar case. He literally abused girls WHILE THEIR OWN PARENTS WERE IN THE ROOM. Sometimes even while their parents were *at their side*. It's horrific.
More specifics on that below, but I just can't get around the reality that if Nassar could do that, it's completely possible. It's possible sexual abuse of children happens in plain sight. While any of us are in the room.
I will leave you with two key quotes from @JimmyHinton12 (whose own father – a pastor – sexually abused his sister without anyone suspecting). Jimmy is the one who reported him. Hinton has made his life's work out of learning about sexual abusers so as to help educate others:
"Not all abuse happens in isolation. In fact, believe it or not, much of it happens directly in front of us...I’ve personally spoken w/100s of survivors who've told me they were abused in the same room as adults, and often while their abuser was speaking w/some of those adults"..
"Most of us falsely believe that this is impossible, or that somehow these adults are oblivious, ignorant, or negligent. Experts in the field of abuse speak about the abuse of children in front of others in terms of “control and power.”..
..."Pedophiles are experts at deception. They are artists and therefore are incredibly creative in how they implement their strategies. They are adaptable and nimble. What they do is dynamic, always changing. Abusers are the definition of becoming all things to all people."...
..."They do heinous acts, and thousands of them to dozens or even hundreds of kids, without having anyone suspect it. In the rare case that someone does suspect it or a victim discloses, the abuser can easily explain the actions away. I know. I lived with one such abuser."...
..."They have already thought of and rehearsed every possible scenario. They think on their feet much better than most of us do. Much of the abuse pedophiles do is intentionally done right in front of us."...
"In fact, the ultimate trophy is to be able to abuse their victims in plain sight of adults without their noticing it. Sure, they abuse in isolation. But they also abuse many of their victims within inches of our eyes. And we don’t notice."
I compiled 11 resources with pull quotes, but most are lengthy and therefore not great for Twitter's format. So I'm linking to my public post on FB, where you can read the key quotes in the comments (all caps mine), and dial into the articles if you want to read them in full.
Hi Comm Director @frandrewgross, your choice of words for @RNS – that the ACNA was, "thankful for the courage of the BelieveUsToo survivors who chose to go public last week and for all survivors who are working to build up the Body of Christ” – were and are still damaging.
Hi Alan Hawkins, your side conversations stirred the pot, poisoned the well, and succeeded in fanning the flames. What is one of a fafillion ways I've seen this with my own eyes? The following quote comes from an email from a longtime Rez member (two tweets, caps mine):
“Seek the truth; come whence it may, cost what it will.”
-William Sparrow
@ChurchRez friends (or former friends, or lurkers), the thread linked below is worth your time. And it will take you time to read all the way through, and stamina, and a willingness to look at the fruit that fear grows: hypocrisy, deceit, pride, and sheer vanity.
It will confront you with clear patterns and documentation. It will remind you that leaders – even leaders who claim to be committed to "the last, the lost, and the least" – have feet of clay.
Who wants a little light reading this weekend? I know – you're tired of reading my posts about church abuse and I'm tired of writing about it. But here in this moment before the 1st report is released, I want to call attention to key concerning things about the investigation.
1)"Bp. Alan Hawkins, the Provincial Response Team’s point person with Mark Rivera’s survivors, did verbally promise that survivors would have a vote on selection of the investigation firm but repeatedly refused (in both written & spoken communication) to clarify who “counted”..."
2)"Bp. Hawkins not only refused to define “survivor,” he did not even attempt to contact multiple publicly-known survivors, all of whose contact information was known to survivors who were in contact with the Province."...
A friend sent this @amandataub article my way – below are key quotes, but the entirety of the piece summarizes solid research and is rather sobering about our human frailty.
Friends (or former friends), especially those who are part of @midwestanglican, @churchrez, or @The_ACNA, I urge you to read this and reflect on our blind spots before it is too late. There are just. so. many. echoes.
Helen Keuning's second witness piece is linked below. An important aspect of this particular piece is how she sheds light on the danger of Either/Or thinking when it comes to the abuse scandal in @The_ACNA.There is so much more Both/And going on in this story with @ChurchRez.
"We're attracted by the “poles”.Either Stewart is a perfectly godly man who's enduring the attacks of Satan&the abuses of the Enemy or he's a sick&twisted man who's been masquerading all these years & who cares little to nothing for injustices & is only out to cover up the truth.
"Those are the two poles that pulled at me — from opposite directions and by opposing voices — throughout my last months of service on the response team at REZ (post-Joanna’s Twitter revelations) and during my many months on the BC post-Stewart’s leave in July."...
Here is Helen Keuning's first witness piece, explaining the yellow (and red) flags she saw firsthand, and the marred and compromised way the Bishop's Council of the Upper Midwest Diocese functioned in the wake of @The_ACNA abuse crisis.
There is A LOT here, it is well documented, it will take you time to sit and read and digest...and it's really important if you've been following the story and are looking to better understand it.