Q: So the reason you think he might be cheating now is because he’s cheated in the past?
A: Yes
Q: Once a cheater, always a cheater?
A: I didn’t say that.
Q: Can you prove that he’s cheated in over the board play more recently?
A: It’s difficult to prove. But I do suspect.
Q: Do you believe in the presumption of innocence?
A: Yes, but there is some indicative evidence here.
Q: Based on online games when he was 12 and 16?
A: Maybe more than that.
Q: Maybe?
A: I can’t say for sure.
Q: So you think he’s probably cheating in over the board play today, or is it just a possibility?
A: Somewhere between the two.
Q: And if he is, how is he doing it?
A: Everyone knows there are ways and means…
Q: So you don’t really know how?
A: No.
Q: So what you’re saying is that the knowledge that he has cheated in the past combined with the possibility that he has cheated in the present makes you feel uncomfortable about playing him?
A: Yes
Q: And is your discomfort more important than the presumption of innocence?
A: I have the right to play whoever I like.
Q: Doesn’t he have the right to do the same? Won’t your actions undermine that?
There’s indicative computer evidence, Carlsen’s intuition, Chess.kom statement, Niemann silence, peer suspicion, but no ‘proof’.
Odds: c30%?
3. Did Neimann cheat in his victory against Carlsen at Sinquefield 2022?
Carlsen suspects so, based on body language, heightened(?) accuracy of play, and the prior context of 1 and 2 above. But no plausible mechanism to cheat, and motivated reasoning.
At @Perspecteeva we are calmly trying to avert the collapse of civilization. If that sounds more like your kind of scene, there's just *one week to go* to apply for the following jobs:
Director of Operations
Community Builder
Research Assistant
Short 🧵
First of all, a link to the relevant page on the website for those who want to get started. The deadline is the end of the day on October 3rd and we ask for a CV and letter in each case. We are also looking for new trustees and audio-visual consultants. systems-souls-society.com/perspectiva-jo…
A few thoughts on the journey so far:
Perspectiva is an organisation trying to improve our understanding of the relationship between systems, souls, and society in theory and practice. I co-founded it in 2016 with Swedish entrepreneur and social theorist Tomas Bjorkman.
131 days since Russia's invasion of Ukraine. I've been following the war closely for personal and professional reasons. What is happening in Ukraine matters even more than many believe, and we're hosting a fundraiser on Thursday to clarify that case: emergeukraine.com
As an international chess player, I faced opponents from the Soviet Union in 1990 just before it collapsed. I remember the red hammer and sickle flag near the board next to my Scottish saltire. In subsequent years I competed with Ukrainian and Russian players and befriended many.
One in-joke in the chess world concerns your participation in 'the B tournament'. In those years I played the B tournament sometimes, and I've had Ukrainian and Russian girlfriends. I also learned to speak some chess Russian to listen in on the analysis of prospective opponents.
Many speak of the present as an interregnum, as liminal, or simply a transition, but my preferred form of words comes from Zak Stein – *a time between worlds* - it gives the idea a poetic and mystical atmosphere for inquiry while also being an empirical claim. Thread 👇
This is the latter stages of a transformation of context that only occurs every 500 years or so. The meta-crisis is not ‘a lot of problems’ we may not solve, rather it is the character of this time between worlds, where one world system is dying but another has yet to be born.
Story disclosure, encounter and reckoning is where we need to start, not story creation. We may need *a new story* as many social change organisations suggest, but we can’t buy one off the shelf, nor brainstorm our way to one that works.
Just finished watching #DontLookUp
Impressive!
I wanted to share what I liked about it before I forget.
Thread 👇
The movie is about a massive comet hurtling towards earth and our failure, first of all to face up to it, due to denial, distraction and displacement, and secondly to deal with it, due to mistaken priorities, the wrong people in power, and failure of global cooperation.
It’s more like a metaphor than an analogy, but it should probably be understood to be about climate change, where similar dynamics are in play. This is tricky, because climate change is not a technical problem, but more like an adaptive challenge. So the problem is not the same.
“Metamodernism is a feeling, and all that constitutes the feeling and flows from it. When we consider the mystery of consciousness and the human drama playing out on this charming anomaly of a planet, feelings are far from trivial – they have cosmological significance…
…The metamodern feeling co-arises through the perception of our context writ large; it is aesthetic in nature, epistemic in function, historical in character, and it serves to call into question the purpose of the world as we find it, and the meaning of life as we know it.”