1/ Now that the Nordstream pipelines are gone it's worth thinking about how a deindustrialisation of Europe via permantly high energy prices. 🧵
2/ European manufacturing will no longer be economically viable. Energy inputs - one of the key inputs in manufacturing - will be too expensive to viably produce products. They will simply be cheaper to buy elsewhere.
3/ There is a good chance some of this manufacturing will move to America - but only in the very short-term. Why? Because investment in manufacturing creates demand for manufactured products. Manufacturing creates jobs in Europe, the workers buy the products.
4/ With no manufacturing jobs, Europeans will have far less purchasing power. If some of the manufacturing moves to America, it will be short-lived. America will realise that much of its export market has collapsed. Note that the EU makes up around 10% of US exports.
5/ Then there are the imports to the US. US continue to buy some but they will be massively more expensive due to higher input costs. The US will try to poach some of this manufacturing and onshore it, but there are numerous constraints here; skilled work, infrastructure etc.
6/ Crushing European manufacturing simply creates a black hole in Europe. This black hole sucks in everything around it as economic activity around its borders dries up. Europe will also have to respond by shutting out exports to try to revive its uncompetitive industry.
7/ Basically the only strategy for Europe will be to shut itself off and force its higher priced products on its residents. This will likely be accompanied by accelerated energy investment policies. This will result in yet more economic chaos for the West.
8/ All of this is basically a repeat of what happened in the 1920s. It resulted in the Great Depression. But this time, only the West will sink into depression. The new BRICS+ bloc is building a seperate economic bloc and will continue to grow while the West wither on the vine.
9/ The European energy war will likely go down in hitory, together with the Treaty of Versailles and the trade wars of the 1930s, as one of the biggest economic policy errors in history.
10/ Another thing: when Trump was elected on a platform of milder protectionism, many people rightly pointed to the 1920s and 1930s and warned against these policies. These same people appear to have supported these much more 1920s/30s-like policies this past year. Ironic.
11/ @TheCriticMag have published a full essay version of this thread. Guaranteed better than the original!
1/ Short thread on why $NVDA is way overvalued and why the stock looks set to fall hard these next few weeks - including some very rough estimates that show a 75% price decline. 📉🧵
2/ $NVDA has been soaring on rapidly growing data centre revenue. Companies are buying up GPUs to gear up for the AI revolution.
3/ Hard to overstate how reliant $NVDA is on these revenues. In Q3 2024 they made around 83% of total revenues!
1/ What is actually happening in Argentina? Has Milei fixed the country? Or do the deep structural problems remain - and are they getting worse? 🇦🇷🧵
2/ The main positive headline is that the Milei government’s cuts have created a government surplus. They have, but this is a distraction as the government deficit was never causing the inflation.
3/ In 2023 the deficit was less than 3% of GDP which is quite modest. For context, Argentina’s neighbour Brazil had a deficit of nearly 9% in 2023 and inflation is below 5%. Milei’s obsession with the deficit is not serious economic analysis.
1/ The media isn’t reporting it but the Biden administration appears to be going into full Hitler-in-the-bunker mode and trying to destroy global energy markets to crush the EU economy and lower American living standards through more inflation to hurt Trump. 🧵
2/ It started with a new sanctions package quietly rolled out on Nov 21st a few weeks after the election. Most didn’t pay attention as the Russian sanctions have been seen as redundant by smart people for over a year now.
3/ But these sanctions were different. They used sanctions on Gazprombank - which the EU buys gas through - to try to interfere with EU energy supplies.
1/ EXCLUSIVE. After extensive investigation and months of on-the-ground reporting I am now able to provide a deep anthropological exposé of the Turboamerica Ecosystem. Join me as I explore this strange and exotic phenomenon. 🚀🇺🇸🧵
2/ The ecosystem is populated with two broad species of creatures. At the top of the hierarchy we have the ‘slopbloggers’ and at the bottom we have the ‘chudpoasters’.
3/ Chudpoasters derive their name from the slur popularised by dirtbag leftist writers some years ago. This characterisation of the right-wing was inaccurate as the right is remarkably intellectually interesting right now but it was correct in that chuds do exist.
1/ With China beefing up its gold reserves and largely opting out of the market for foreign holdings of US Treasuries - which is already causing liquidity problems - it’s useful to get a sense of what the Chinese are saying about this internally. 🧵
2/ Here we turn to the latest issue of the China Institute of Contemporary International Relations’ journal. CICIR is an important government-affiliated think tank that has been around since 1965. So borderline official doctrine coming from this shop.
3/ In the Contents section we see not one, but two articles on the US dollar. ‘The Exorbitant Privilege of US Treasuries and China’s Choice in the New Era’ and ‘Impact of Financial Sanctions on the Dollar’s International Status’.
1/ Now that we have the results let’s take a look at the Shy Trump Effect and how it performed. Remember: when applying the Shy Trump Effect to the polls all we are doing is standard statistical practice. Why can’t @NateSilver538 and @FiveThirtyEight figure it out? 🤷♂️
2/ Some of the swing states haven’t been called but we have some idea of spread. In what follows I will use ‘Trump’s Lead Over Harris’ as the measure. Just as in the original Shy Trump Effect prediction thread.
3/ We start with Arizona.
Polls = +2.6%
Shy Trump Model = +4.9
Result = +4.7%