Johnny Rico was once asked by Jean V Dubois how many lives were worth fighting for. It's an important question given today's climate. BTW, if you don't know who Mr. Rico and Mr. Dubois are, well you are missing out on one of the great philosophical works of the modern age.
Although the question posed to Mr. Rico was about the fate of POW's after a fictional WWIII it bears on the world we live in today exactly because we may be on the cusp of WWIII. Putin appears to be betting the fate of humanity on a deadly serious question. Will the US respond
with force if I use nuclear weapons. There are only 3 possible answers to that question. 1. Yes, so I might as well go all in ad initio and cue REM to play one last time.
Option 2 is Yes, but escalation can be controlled and a conventional war with the US won't go nuclear and I can prevail conventionally ending with the survival of my regime. This is absolute hubris and is only on the list because Putin is so obviously mad to even be risking
NATO intervention. Once the nuclear genie is popped you can't go back because you cannot be trusted. That leaves option 3: No, the US will walk away from the fight rather than engage. In effect Putin is betting that Johnny Rico will answer, No lives are worth war. This is a major
error in reasoning despite what the appeaseniks say. Look's its highly likely that if the US walks away from Ukraine, that Putin's threat to the west is over. He is an old man and is unlikely to live long enough to see his military rebuilt in time to pursue further direct action.
The problem is that Russia will and will be emboldened by US weakness and in 15-20 years it will be the Baltic's turn and in the meantime the west will fragment. If the US walks away it is far more likely there won't be a NATO than there won't be another invasion. It will herald
a new age of empire. Ukraine wasn't a proxy war, it was a just fight by a free people striving to keep themselves free from their historic abusive imperial overlords. The endless drumbeat of nuclear war however means it is now a proxy war that Russia is waging against the west
via Ukraine. It is not the West or the US that is escalating. The escalation comes from Russia, who having been defeated on the battlefield and now reduced to buying drones from Iran and using 1st year cadets as leaders of men in battle now looks to protect its ill gotten
loot via nuclear blackmail. The thing is, those 3 choices will also be faced by Biden if Putin pulls the trigger. Obviously if we detect a first strike well that is an easy choice, launch all the stuff and lets all meet at God's place. But if he only conducts a "localized" attack
then what? Can you bet that Putin won't go global when the USAF backed by NATO destroys what the Russians call an army and air force inside of a week? Do you back off and surrender to evil in trade for a few more years until the whole thing kicks off again this time with no
alliance to oppose it, or do you try and take Russia off the board ad initio to try and prevent a massive two way nuclear exchange? This is not a conversation for twitter. Lay people should not have to have this discussion at all. As recently as January 2022 the P5 members issued
a joint declaration that, "Nuclear war is unwinnable and must never be fought". Yet here we are... I'd like to think some semblance of rationality would penetrate to the Kremlin's inner circle. They do appear to be responsive-ish to the fubarred nature of the mobilization. But
in so many other ways they appear divorced from reality and trapped in group think and hostage to the sunken costs fallacy. So that begs the question now what? What do we do? As you know I tag my elected leaders every day. This is my message to them knowing I am betting my
grandkids lives on it. @JohnBoozman, @SenTomCotton, @RepFrenchHill stay strong, support @POTUS as he sends arms to Ukraine and opposes the #GenocideOfUkrainians. The only way to convince Putin that nuclear war is unwinnable is being ready to fight it. A MAD world is safer than
one held hostage to the whims of a madman. It's the only reasonable path forward. We can't stop him from destroying the world if he wants too, but we can make sure that he knows, that every Russian knows that he and his cliche and all they stand for dies first. Russian's play
Chess, American's play poker and its time to call the bluff by saying checkmate. To my readers, yeah, very depressing essay but it's the world we live in. All we can do is what we have been doing. Prepare now and pray. Keep donating to charities like @MriyaAid or @UkraineAidOps
support units like the @georgian_legion and help #NAFO combat Russian dis-info that is directly targeted to try and make people choose surrender and future slavery over resolution and the chance to live free. Promote Ukraine and Ukrainian voices into the other parts of your lives
be the sinew that connects your community to what is happening in Ukraine. This is no longer just Ukraine's war to win, we are all now combatants according to Russia. Act like it. Until Ukraine wins on Ukraine's terms: Slava Ukraini!
So in todays awesome sauce news roundup. I have two things to report, one is local-ish awesome sauce the other is spicy awesome sauce. First the local.
This local news report and the follow on comments on twitter show at least 3 other Arkansans who are #Fellas other than me. That warms my heart and adds weight to my daily reminders to @JohnBoozman, @SenTomCotton, and @RepFrenchHill that #NAFO
is alive and well in the Natural State: WPS! It's also a message to people like @lavern_spicer that we vote for Ukraine, not against it. America has a moral duty to oppose fascism and genocide, its a promise our grandparents made to the World when we fought Hitler and Tojo.
Did the US destroy the Nordstream pipelines? Seems to be a common question being pushed by Kleptograd's supporters. Although we can't know for sure since we won't have access to the forensic evidence who has the most to gain? Occam's Razor and the Socratic Method will have to
do. Some of the questions that need answering are: who had the most to gain, who had easiest access, who has the technical means. Why were they attacked in the way they were. Why was USN ASW aircraft so active over the area. What was that Kilo class SS doing? How would the US get
a SSN into the area. Ready set go! 1. Who had the most to gain? If you think about it, Russia has the most to gain by the destruction of the pipelines. Both were dead lines that were never coming back online at anything close to full capacity because Germany had already made
This short clip from @bayraktar_1love says more about the modern Russian way of war as it regards its own troops than anything else I have seen. Hooley phuq.... These guys are screwed six ways from Sunday. I don't feel bad for them, they voted for this shit after all when they
marched to the commissariat in September rather than in the streets in February. We should all be thankful they really are that stupid. Can you imagine the world of hurt we would all be in, if the Russian's were even half as efficient as their ideological warfighting inspiration
the Mongols were? When the Mongols showed up and taught the early Russian's what real war was like the steppe horsemen had world class officers and logistics, highly trained and well-equipped troops and a ruthlessness that would make anyone but a Roman legionnaire blanche. They
@mtracey, to answer your question in a longer more conversational format, yes I do see some issues here. Ok if anyone wants to follow along his post is here.
1. The first major issue is of course that 7 months in, Zelensky still does not have all the arms he needs to make sure his nation can fight and win a war against imperial aggression in order to stop a #GenocideOfUkrainians
2. The second major issue, Russia is moving to annex territories that she herself vouchsafed multiple times. Other than the genocide this is the big issue. If Russia cannot be a reliable partner because she steadfastly adheres to her legal obligations then she is at best a rouge
Todays post is a bit different. I am going to tackle the Russian myth that they won WWII and that the allies were bit players. This is a historic lie. Starting off let us admit, that most of the dying was done in the east, but dying is not how you win
wars. Second, most of the German army was tied down in the east but this is not in and of itself important. There was a lot of German kit that could have changed the course of the war in the East except for the allies. Take for example the 88mm gun. The German's in the East
never had enough of them because of the need to defend Germany from allied heavy bombers. Ditto the German air force that was forced to surrender the skies to the VVS in order to defend Germany and her logistics like Ploiesti? How much steel and diesel was diverted to the U-boat
Can't sleep so I guess I will get an early start on today's essay. Yesterday's blew up and caught me completely flatfooted as I did not consider it among my best works but it obviously resonated. That probably says more about you my readers than it does about me. Nuance is
important and the way I pointed out that Russia is using mobilization to affect an ethnic cleansing of its own minority populations hit a nerve. It shows that despite all the Russia Fuck OFF flying around twitter my readers at least realize that a big chunk of the Russian
population are actually captive peoples and only have value to Kleptograd in the provision of slave soldiers. WE see this idea that its someone else's duty to fight for Russia in the long lines of Russian men trying to flee. Now that they might get a notice (vs minorities being