Garry Kasparov Profile picture
Sep 28 8 tweets 2 min read
This is the same argument for “lowering risk” that was used when Putin invaded Ukraine in 2014: Don’t fight him and he’ll go away. Today, because of that mistake, the costs and risks are far higher, but you want to repeat the blunder.
Making concessions to Putin to relieve short-term pressure only guarantees greater escalation later—a time span that will grow shorter each time. It gives Putin more time and resources and convinces him you’ll fold again over bigger threats next time.
Many in the West are so eager to declare a false peace with a war criminal dictatorship, to be hailed as a voice of reason and diplomacy in the moment, that they fail to achieve real peace. It’s just kicking the can, appeasement poorly disguised as diplomacy.
Ukrainians are fighting and dying, sacrificing in a way a generation of Western nations refused to despite being far more powerful. Those nations, including the US, instead made deals with Putin, gave him trillions, held summits. Abandon Ukraine again?
The “diplomatic” cognitive error is not understanding, or not wanting to understand, that reducing your perceived tension with a dictator increases the actual risks, including nuclear risk. This should not need to be explained again after what happened this year.
Read Russia–West news from 2021, up until Putin started massing forces on Ukraine’s border. Despite Navalny, there were summits, pipeline deals, etc. all during Russia’s brutality in occupied Ukraine since 2014. Putin attacked because of all that, not in spite of it.
Saying “let’s stop the violence” or “peace now,” sounds so nice. It’s also music to a dictator’s ears because of course Putin won’t stop his violence when you stop fighting. And he’ll have time to consolidate and rearm for his next attack. Learn from experience, for once.
The risks for Putin have increased for once, thanks to Ukraine’s bravery and skill plus Western allies who found an unexpected leader in faraway Kyiv. Putin is losing, the only road to a real peace, to lower risks. Don’t throw him a lifeline again. Glory to Ukraine.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Garry Kasparov

Garry Kasparov Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Kasparov63

Sep 26
It's time again to talk about goals of the war. To say loud and clear that Ukraine's territory must be 100% liberated of Russian invaders. That there can be no way back to normalcy for Russia with Putin the war criminal still in charge. 1/5
Russians are resisting Putin's desperate mobilization and Ukraine is winning. It's time to finish the job, to give Ukraine everything and Putin nothing. But Western allies are still holding back despite Russia's open transformation into a fascist dictatorship. 2/5
The winds of freedom are drifting across the globe. Iran, Dagestan, people are inspired directly and indirectly. If Ukraine can defeat Putin, dictators aren't invincible. Even Serbia won't recognize Putin's illegal annexations, not wanting to back a loser. 3/5
Read 5 tweets
Sep 21
Putin's mobilization is more pathetic than partial, and Russian recruitment will continue to target poor regions, migrants, & others without resources to leave or push back. That works until one day, in one place and then another, it doesn't.
War but not a war. A defensive invasion. A weak enemy that requires all our resources. Be angry and afraid but ignore it. Etc. The Kremlin has tried to have it all ways and the contradictions will keep piling up until they collapse on Putin's head.
Putin has had two decades to build up a militarized police state with countless billions in energy money from Europe. The tipping point will come when those around him decide he is risking their fortunes, families, and skins.
Read 10 tweets
Sep 20
As I wrote on July 7, more illegal annexations of Ukrainian territory are Putin's next desperate escalation. After successfully bluffing the West for so long, he hopes that calling occupied territory "Russia" will intimidate the cowards and aid the appeasers.
Putin will also use fake referenda and annexations for internal propaganda, to push his unpopular war by saying NATO and the US [sic] are attacking Russia, another predictable escalation. This rhetoric has already been used.
Ukraine is up to the challenge. Europe, US, and the rest of Ukraine's allies must prove themselves again, however. There are always appeasers looking for excuses to sell out Ukrainian lives & sovereignty for another fake peace and cheaper gas.
Read 4 tweets
Sep 8
I will not delve into the ugly insinuations of the matter now, but must remark on what we do know: World chess champion Magnus Carlsen withdrew from the world's premier tournament in St. Louis, an act with no precedent in the past 50 years, and his explanation is required.
Carlsen's withdrawal was a blow to chess fans, his colleagues at the tournament, the organizers, and, as the rumors and negative publicity swirl in a vacuum, to the game. The world title has its responsibilities, and a public statement is the least of them here.
Apparently Chess.com has banned the young American player who beat Carlsen, which prompted his withdrawal and the cheating allegations. Again, unless the chess world is to be dragged down into endless pathetic rumors, clear statements must be made.
Read 4 tweets
Sep 5
Bingo. Ukraine fighting for its survival isn’t the problem. Helping Ukraine fight isn’t a favor. Russia’s unprovoked invasion is the problem, and Ukrainians are fighting for the entire free world, as well as those who would be free. They must win.
Don’t complain about gas prices when you are only spending the money you saved for 20 years by funding Putin’s dictatorship. You didn’t care when we begged you to stop as he crushed our democracy, and warned you not become dependent on a mafia dictatorship.
Putin is responsible. Russians are responsible, even those who fought the regime almost from the start. We failed. But Europe and the free world gave Putin every advantage. Open markets, political capital. They fed this monster, empowered him. Now they talk about gas?
Read 5 tweets
Sep 4
My article on Mikhail Gorbachev in @NYDailyNews. I met him once, on 20 Jan 1985, the day he sent Soviet troops into my home city of Baku, where they shot protesters. Gorbachev is best described as a successful failure. nydailynews.com/opinion/ny-ope…
Did Gorbachev smother the Communist state with his reforms, or did it die of natural causes despite his best attempts to resuscitate it? How much do cause and motive matter when the results were undeniably good? To those of us in the USSR, very little.
Gorbachev was the conductor of a steam train that was headed off a cliff when it ran out of coal. He was hailed as a hero by onlookers, but the train’s passengers, we all watched in horror as Gorbachev tossed his cap and jacket into the furnace. My op-ed: nydailynews.com/opinion/ny-ope…
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(