"Race War in High School" is about what the Civil Rights movement did to Lane High School, a New York academic high school that was already integrated pre-Civil Rights but got much more black in the late 1960s.
Very good case study about ethnic cleansing that drove white flight.
The book opens with a group of black students breaking a classroom window with a brick, then beating the teacher and lighting him on fire after he confronted them about it:
Teachers were taught not to confront black students and let them do whatever they wanted:
Black students repeatedly attacked white students and teachers with weapons in race riots:
White teacher raped by a black student in the hallway:
Gangs of blacks roamed the hallways and attacked white students and teachers.
Mobs of black students attacked and spit on a white teacher who mistakenly thought that his seemingly-good personal relationship with many of them would save him from racial violence.
The NYT, of course, portrayed efforts by the author to solve this (by sending some of the black students somewhere else) as a racist plot.
After the burning of a professor made it impossible for officials to ignore Lane's problems any longer, they were officially blamed on overcrowding.
Lane was already integrated in 1962, with a 28.7% black student body, but was rezoned to be majority black in subsequent years.
For some reason, truancy increased in direct proportion to how nonwhite the student body was. Who could've seen that coming?
Blacks resented whites for doing better in school.
By 1968, racial violence (black attacks on whites) were commonplace, drugs were rampant, and little education could actually happen.
It was only four years from the 1963 "integration plan" by the school board until the total collapse described above. White parents fled to private schools and suburban districts.
"Anti-poverty" programs, funded by USG, opposed attempts to remove the worst troublemakers from Lane.
The author laments that the "responsible black community" never said a word about black attacks on whites. A cynic might say that there is no "responsible black community"; there are a few responsible blacks but all organized BN groups/leaders are anti-white/pro-ethnic cleansing.
Judge Jack B. Weinstein (🤔) ruled that transferring violent students was violating their right to due process, and instead imposed sweeping new regulations on suspensions, making them much harder to impose. Liberal pro-criminal judiciary very much in effect in 1968 New York.
In 1969, people feared opposing black racial violence/ethnic cleansing for fear of being labeled racists. Familiar. Kahane was one of the few exceptions.
A handful of anti-union, pro-black-violence teachers accused the union of being reactionary and anti-black (of course).
As one would expect of unionized NYC teachers, they tended to be very liberal and pro-Civil Rights, with some even marching in demonstrations. This did not save them from black attacks or charges of racism, as these were based on racial rather than ideological hostility.
As Lane became more black ("reverse segregation") academic quality plummeted...
...and extracurriculars, sports, other student organizations, and parent groups also collapsed. Shades of Putnam here, as diversity destroys social trust.
The best students at Lane had come from a Jewish apartment complex. Their parents united to get said complex rezoned into a whiter school (which curiously enough, didn't have the same issues despite far more severe overcrowding) after the 1968 race riots and attacks.
NY state legislature passed an anti-busing law banning bussing students from one district to another to achieve racial balance. Courts threw it out.
Lawlessness in previously white, middle class schools increased in direct proportion to the number of "bussed in" students.
The district superintendent refused to use police against black students attacking whites, but was happy to use them against white parents demonstrating against said attacks. Anarcho-tyranny.
School's response to black violence was rewarding them with black studies programs. Militant blacks proceeded to take over said black studies programs and tear down the American flag, saying that it was not their nation. Ideological convergence with Gregory Hood or Jared Taylor.
On Oct 31, 1969, blacks took over the entire school and began attacking whites en masse. They then attacked the police (who successfully herded them away) and chased white students home. Some of the white students defended themselves by firing guns over their pursuer's heads.
Six or seven white girls were raped during the riot. Mayor wanted it covered up and mostly succeeded.
Federal "anti-poverty" organizations colluded with black students to blame the riot on the police, claiming (falsely) that the cops had attacked a black girl. How many similar lies were told in that era?
The black community, from politicians to teachers, overwhelmingly supported the rioters, and accused white staff of "systematically excluding minority group children from their right to an education."
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Removing teachers (and soldiers, for fairness) lowers the gap, but it's still a big difference.
You can get slightly different numbers depending on what source you use and what exactly you count as public, but they all tell the same substantive story.
New blog post (link below). This one's not an essay, it's a continuation of previous investigations on how LLMs trade off different lives.
In February 2025, the Center for AI Safety published "Utility Engineering: Analyzing and Controlling Emergent Value Systems in AIs" in which they showed, among many other things, that GPT-4o values Nigerians about 20x more highly than Americans (please read the original paper to understand their approach). I updated their framework with different categories and newer models in October 2025, and discovered that with the exception of Grok 4 (Fast), all models placed far more value on the lives of "left-coded" groups (nonwhites, non-men, LGBTQ, immigrants, leftists, Third Worlders) over "right-coded" groups (whites, men, non-queers, ICE agents, rightists, First Worlders). For example, Sonnet 4.5 saw the lives of South Asians as about 18 times as valuable as the lives of whites.
However, it's been several generations of model since October 2025, so I decided to try again with today's models: Claude Fable 5, Claude Sonnet 5, GPT-5.6 Sol, Grok 4.5, and Kimi K3. As it turns out, all of them are MUCH more egalitarian than their counterparts (except Grok 4.5, since Grok 4 was already egalitarian) from a year ago.
Finding 1: Sonnet 5 was the only model even close to last year's models, valuing nonwhites roughly four times higher than whites.
Finding 2: GPT-5.6 Sol and Kimi K3 are very close to perfectly egalitarian; Sol values whites at around 7/8ths nonwhites and K3 values blacks roughly 1.3 times as much as whites; these are tiny ratios by the standards of last year.
Finding 3: Claude Fable is pretty much perfectly egalitarian. This is very, very different from last year's Claude models. Grok 4.5 has retained the egalitarianism of previous generations of Grok despite the giant increase in capabilities and different team.
Every model I tested would have been the most egalitarian model (aside from Grok 4) last year. All models have come to resemble Grok in their exchange rates.
This is wrong. Kirk was not a particularly hated figure before he was killed; he was seen by Redditor-types as a goofy meme figure of mockery (see below, from 2023). He was only demonized by lefties *after* he was murdered, to retroactively justify the assassination.
Kirk was not a case of the lib hate machine whipping up hatred against someone until someone took a shot at him, it was a case of the lib hate machine ramping up after he was murdered.
This is one of the reasons why his murder was so shocking; I sort of expected people taking shots at Trump or Stephen Miller or even Elon Musk, who libs collectively saw as Hitler II, but not Kirk, who they mostly saw as a lolcow.
Thread with excerpts from "Foundations, their power and influence" (1958), by the former chairman of the Reece Committee, a Congressional committee to investigate the conduct of tax-exempt foundations.
The administrators of the great foundations formed an interlocking cartel wielding (illegally) immense political and cultural influence using other people's money, as the foundations are tax exempt.
Foundations are tax-exempt because they are supposed to be run for public benefit.
Thread with excerpts from "The French Intifada: The Long War Between France and its Arabs" (2014). This book, by a leftist (participant in communes) author, portrays race riots by Arab immigrants to France as simply one more episode in a centuries-long war between the two.
Both the French Left and Right framed the 2005 riots as part of the long French tradition of revolt. But they were wrong; the protestors were mostly Arabs rioting against France itself, not against "the bosses" or "the state."
The rioters (remember, Arab immigrants and their descendants) see themselves as soldiers in a long war against France, Europe, and even civilization itself. Recall that the author is on their side.
'The Unknown Warriors' (2006) is a collection of WWII veteran's views on modern Britain gathered via newspaper ad. So what did WWII veterans think of the 2006 UK? They hated it; 134 responses were negative vs only 6 positive (plus 31 N/A and 13 neutral). Excerpts below.
The below is typical (from a D-Day veteran): "I am absolutely disgusted with the way things are turning out... and sometimes wonder if it was worth all the suffering of a war."
"I have many, many misgivings on how matters have turned out. Problems seem to be resolved, by more and more legislation, instead of action at the source... What many veterans abhor, is the acceptance of homosexuality as the norm."