🚨BREAKING: Montana judge STRIKES DOWN 3 voter suppression laws that ban Election Day registration, limit ballot collection and increase restrictions on acceptable photo ID to vote, ruling that they violate the Montana Constitution. More info to come. democracydocket.com/cases/montana-…
#SB169 restricted the use of student IDs to vote: "It is no accident that the Legislature passed SB 169 just months after MT’s youngest voters turned out to vote at record rates. MT’s legislators passed the bill to prevent some young Montanans from exercising their right to vote"
"The 'interests' the Secretary and the Legislature had in the implementation of SB 169 include an interest in addressing voter fraud. There have been no instances of voter fraud concerning the use of student IDs in Montana."
#HB176 eliminated Election Day registration: "By eliminating EDR, HB 176 severely burdens the right to vote of Montana voters, particularly Native American voters, students, the elderly, and voters with disabilities."
"HB 176 also does not combat voter fraud. EDR has not been implicated in a single instance of voter fraud in Montana...Because HB 176 burdens the right to vote and does not further a compelling state interest through the least onerous path, it is unconstitutional"
#HB530 restricted ballot collection efforts: "HB 530, § 2 is a solution in search of a problem. It furthers no legitimate, let alone compelling, state interest, and constitutes a disproportionate, severe, and unconstitutional burden on Plaintiffs’ constitutional right to vote."
"the Secretary cannot justify...ballot collection restrictions under any standard because she has failed to provide any evidence that MT has a problem of voter fraud or voter confidence related to ballot collection, or that HB 530, § 2 would improve those purported problems."
"There is no evidence of any voter fraud in Montana associated with EDR, student IDs, or third-party ballot assistance, and not even the Secretary’s own witnesses
believe voter fraud is a problem in Montana."
.@marceelias isn't exaggerating — this week will be incredibly busy for voting rights and democracy in the courts. Here's what will be happening, what you need to know and how you can stay updated.⤵️🧵
⚖️Monday, Oct. 3: The North Carolina Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in a lawsuit claiming that a state law requiring photo ID to vote was passed with the intent to discriminate against Black voters in violation of the NC Constitution. democracydocket.com/cases/north-ca…
Oral arguments will start at 1:00 pm ET tomorrow. We'll be live tweeting the court proceedings, and you can watch along here.👇 youtube.com/channel/UCWo6z…
On Tuesday, Oct. 4, the U.S. Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in Merrill v. Milligan, a case that could effectively eliminate the power behind Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act, which protects against racial vote dilution.
Here’s what you need to know.👇🧵
Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act (VRA) — the most litigated provision of the VRA — currently prohibits any law that has the intent or effect of denying or abridging the right to vote “on account of race or color.”
Since the VRA was enacted in 1965, Section 2 has been used in redistricting litigation to strike down maps that dilute the voting strength of minority voters by “packing” and “cracking” them across districts to prevent minority groups from electing preferred candidates.
A hearing was scheduled for next week in a lawsuit from conservatives seeking to limit the use of drop boxes in Lehigh County, Pennsylvania: democracydocket.com/cases/pennsylv…
A motion to dismiss a lawsuit challenging Georgia’s legislative and congressional maps was denied. The fight for fair maps in the Peach State continues: democracydocket.com/cases/georgia-…
SEN. KLOBUCHAR (D-Minn.): Enacted in 1887...the ECA was largely overlooked for over 100 years, but it was at the center of a plan to overturn the 2020 election and the will of the American people that, as we all know who work here, culminated in a violent mob.
We have tracked 20 voter suppression cases filed since 2018 where Raffensperger has been a named defendant. Let’s go through them. democracydocket.com/cases/state/ge…
🚨COURT ALERT: This morning at 10:00 am ET, the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania will hold a hearing in a Republican lawsuit challenging the authority of county boards of elections to develop cure procedures for mail-in ballots.
Earlier this month, Republican groups filed a lawsuit alleging that PA county BOEs were violating state election code by implementing curing procedures. Curing is a process that allows voters to fix small mistakes on their mail-in ballots to ensure their vote is counted.