If you put on your own mask when you see a masked person enter the room:
1) Thank you for trying to be supportive. Truly. It's nice to be cared for & not harassed.
and
2) Let's talk about how airborne transmission works... (I PROMISE this isn't a "mask always" tweet) 🧵1/16
There's a lot of misinformation and confusion about COVID transmission, and that isn't your fault. It's a complicated history, but here's the upshot:
Some viruses are in big droplets & fall quickly to the ground removing them from the air. Plus, your mask can catch some.
2/16
But much of the virus are in tiny virus aerosols that DON'T fall quickly. They float for hours.
So your unmasked exhalations from the past hours you've been in the room are STILL THERE & still infectious. (Even after you leave the room!!)
They can even move to other rooms.
3/16
Distance helps because these virus aerosols get diluted.
Imagine smoking a cig & stubbing it out as someone else comes in. Close up, it's very smoky. Across the room, it's still smoky. Down the hall, you can probably still smell it, bc some smoke particles are out there.
4/16
Putting on a mask when someone walks in is like stubbing out your smoke indoors.
It's definitely a nice courtesy. It helps people feel cared for. It reduces total amount of smoke.
But you are still exposing them to smoke. (Or COVID, at high enough amounts to infect)
5/16
And if you are wearing a baggy or non-filtering mask, the improvement is more like leaving the burning cigarette in the ashtray for occasional puffs, rather than stubbing it out.
It needs to be N95+/KN94+ or similar to do much good w/ new variants.
Step 2: Get a GOOD 'mask'. Since you are nice enough to bother to wear it sometimes, you might as well use one that will actually make a big difference.
You need a respirator, like N95 or KN94. It needs to fit snugly with no gaps.
10/16
Step 3: Prepare for your masked friend BEFORE they arrive.
Even just 5-10 minutes before they come, you can put your good respirator on, and make sure it seals well.
Then open a window, turn on extra filters, cycle the air.
11/16
Think about trying to "secretly" smoke indoors. How would you hide it from someone about to arrive and "bust" you? (Air-fresheners do NOT count!)
You'd stop creating more smoke (mask) & try to blow the old air outside + filter it away for several min before they arrive.
12/16
Step 4: Keep your distance.
You are more likely to be infected than someone already carefully masking all the time. Give them a fighting chance & lots of extra air space to further dilute any virus that might still be slipping past your mask.
13/16
Step 5: Keep it small, short and sweet.
The less time you share air, the less chance of infection. The fewer people, the better as well.
If it needs to be big or long, consider going outside or ask them if there is anything more you can do to make it safer for them.
14/16
Bonus options:
Upper-room UV can kill virus in the air. You still need to distance & aim for good filtration/mixing but it is very effective.
Far-UVC (222 nm) is even safe on the skin. Put it around your room & kill most virusols almost instantly.
@ScienceUpFirst If you happen to find this message appropriate, would you consider sprucing it up in your special social-media-friendly way and sharing it along? I think there are still quite a few ppl out there who want to be supportive, but don't get the details right.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I'd be very glad if we stopped using the word "hysterical", especially to describe "excessive negative emotion".
It's mysogynist, ableist and usually intellectually dishonest.
🧵 1/9
Hysteria means "wandering uterus". It was a diagnosis for women deemed "neurotic" in antiquity-1900s. Incl. misdiagnosed physical illness, claiming they're imagined/faked/mental.
It ONLY applied to women
bc women were less rationale, controlled, intelligent & mature. (/s)
2/9
It was also a way to reinforce the idea that their experiences are less worthy of consideration and belief.
And literally used as justification for locking them away, indefinitely, in asylums. (Or sometimes, treating with vibrators, but that's a WHOLE different thread.)
3/9
Do not reply unless you're ready to treat these data in rigorous, scientific, dispassionate ways. It won't make you or your msg look good, it will just drive traffic to my argument.
But if you *do* have legit, scientifically-rigorous rebuttals or questions, pls give feedback.
Main Argument:
Where vaccination does not affect LC symptoms, lacking vaccination also cannot have a statistically-significant effect.
And where vaccination improves certain outcomes, it cannot simultaneously worsen them.
Other scientists suggest basic safety precautions. (#BringBackMasks)
Immediately trolls blame the vax & use slurs & ableist language.🧵
It's shocking to me how vitriolic, irrational, ignorant & frankly crap-tastic these people's behavior is.
Most folx here are in societies where even basic precautions have been abandoned. Yet trolls come hunting to vilify & belittle those providing real medical science. Why?
Is it ego preservation? Can they not cope w/ those "sanctimonious" medical experts who know better and act to avoid infecting themselves/others?
Do they fear, deep down, "What if I've been wrong about everything? What if infecting my family by ignoring safety was a bad choice?"
I had a discussion in another thread that gave me pause. I am sharing it as a good reminder to science-types that we, as mere humans, see the world through our own experience.
So we must periodically take a moment to examine our own biases. /1 A Thread🧵
The "coping mechanism" and religion parts discomfited & reminded me of similar arguments from opposite perspective (denial as coping mechanism). It seemed kindly meant. Science requires we actively challenge our own hypotheses.
So I did. /2
We ARE all victims of this virus & we have limited control in a dangerous world.
Masking IS an (active-approach) coping mechanism like most safety/health measures. Med, Agriculture, Law, etc all attempt to control our world & cope w/ capricious Nature. /3 ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/P…
This independent volunteer group also aggregates officially-reported data for each province and from PHAC to make it easier for everyone to get up-to-date data and compare it around the country.
You can help make good data available. They need more data from self-reported RAT testing (positive, negative and inconclusive results - if you test, just take a moment to report it).
You can also help by sharing with your contacts. More reports➡️ more reliable data & trends.
/2 Gov of AB wants us to believe COVID cases are not so high comparatively, and anyway it's "just" Omicron, the 'mild' one, right? Seems safe enough, esp for those who vaxxed and/or were recently infected (the combination being over 80% of all Albertans) alberta.ca/stats/covid-19…
/3 It's a trick. An optical illusion.
Low prevalence leads to low case numbers.
But so does low testing. AB cut testing to ludicrously low rates. AB has the lowest per capita testing of all the large provinces in Canada, 1/2 the national avg.