@ETHWarsaw The first executive vote of September also raised the WSTETH-B Debt Ceiling to 200 million ↗️
This is the only volatile-collateral vault type with a 0% Stability Fee, and the increase in its Debt Ceiling pumped the DAI minted from it to 120 million DAI!
@ETHWarsaw Maker Governance voted to greenlight $GNO 🗳
That means risk, collateral, and oracle assessments will be posted soon on the Maker Forum to evaluate the actual viability of onboarding $GNO as a new collateral type in the Maker Protocol.
This MIP aims to invest up to 500 million USDC from the PSM in traditional financial assets with variable APY of the SOFR interest rate, payable in USDC.
The initiative aims to contribute to MakerDAO 1.25% APY for any GUSD in the PSM, as long as the average monthly balance on the last day of the month is over 100 million GUSD 🤝
In recent months, the Maker community has seen multiple proposals pursuing initiatives to invest the stablecoins allocated in the PSM with the aim of diversifying MakerDAO's revenue streams.
What are these proposals and how are they doing?
🧵↓
1/
1️⃣ MIP65: Monetalis Clydesdale: Liquid Bond Strategy & Execution
This MIP aims to onboard a real-world asset (RWA) Maker Vault with a debt ceiling of 500 million DAI that will acquire USDC via the PSM and invest them in approved bond strategies.
But not because of how it is backed or because of its peg mechanism.
It is because of the decentralized, open-source, and resilient infrastructure that sustains it.
Here are the 5 essential points to understand why DAI is a different stablecoin.
🧵↓
1/
1️⃣ Because of Maker Vaults
Maker Vaults are the lending core of Maker.
By opening a Maker Vault, users can deposit their crypto as collateral, such as ETH, and generate DAI against it as a loan.
As a result, the user created a DAI-denominated collateralized debt position.
2/
The Maker Protocol will establish specific parameters for all new vaults in order to maintain the over-collateralization of DAI at all times and thus protect its users.
This is why every Maker Vault has a yearly stability fee and minimum collateralization ratio.
3/
Once the Merge takes place, a forked Ethereum PoW chain appears to be imminent, with a non-zero chance that it will use the same chainId as the PoS chain.
What are the implications of this risk for the Maker Protocol, Dai, and MKR holders?
🧵↓
1/
The Protocol Engineering Core Unit published a document called “Maker Protocol, the Merge and Future Forks of Ethereum ” outlining the potential risks of replay attacks.
The following changes are ready to be executed if MKR holders and Delegates support them with their vote.
↓
1/
📊 MOMC Parameter Changes
The following vault parameter changes recommended by the Maker Open Market Committee - Parameter Proposal Group will be made if this executive proposal passes:
2/
The Merge is approaching, and some users may be worried about what will happen after this historic Ethereum upgrade.
As a user, you don't have to take any specific action to keep your Maker Vault up and running or to hold your Dai.
Here is why.
🧵↓
1/
The Merge is an Ethereum upgrade, and the Maker Protocol will continue to work as it does today, with the same smart contract system, once the migration to Proof of Stake is complete.
This is basically because the Merge won’t affect the existing execution layer of Ethereum.
2/
The execution layer is where accounts, balances, smart contracts, and the blockchain state are.
The Merge will only replace Proof of Work with the new Proof of Stake consensus mechanism.
3/