Mark Hertling Profile picture
Oct 3 11 tweets 4 min read
A 🧵on recent media stories about US "planning reaction to Putin's potential use of nuclear weapons."

While Americans may have concerns about how Ukrainian successes may cause Putin to do more dumb things (use nukes), the US does extensive planning on these (& other) issues. 1/
I just discussed this - in shorter terms - with @AlisynCamerota on @cnn.

Some background:

1. @DeptofDefense, the Joint Staff, and several combatant commands develop "contingency plans" based on strategic guidance for all threats. See chart ⬇️ 2/
COCOM Contingency Plans (at the bottom) are written based on @POTUS & DOD guidance. Those span a spectrum of actions the military must execute, including humanitarian efforts, combat, & deterrence of/reaction to enemy use of nuclear weapons.

There's even a planning manual.⬇️3/
These contingency plans (some call them "war plans," though not all address war) are developed by Combatant Commanders & their staffs throughout the world & are approved by the @SecDef. The CJCS's staff maintains these coordinated & approved plans in the Pentagon. 4/
These plans are reviewed often, are subject to "war gaming" & "red teaming" on a recurring basis.

There is always a "plan" (with multiple courses of actions, depending on the enemy) for deterring or countering RU (and other's) use of Nuclear Weapons on the shelf. 5/
In fact, back in March, the @nytimes published this story (which truthfully, made me smile for several reasons)....6/

nytimes.com/2022/03/23/us/…
The reporters stated: "The WH has quietly assembled a team of national security officials to sketch out scenarios of how the United States and its allies should respond [to] Putin unleashes....chemical, biological or nuclear weapons."

They also said... 7/
"The Tiger Team, as the group is known, is also examining responses if Mr. Putin reaches into NATO territory."

I smiled because these teams ALWAYS exist & sketch out scenarios (what the military calls "courses of action") & they are almost always called a "TIGER TEAM."
8/
Anyway...

During conflict, contingency plans -especially those involving deterrence or reaction to potential nuclear strikes- generate dozens of potential actions/reactions.

Having been involved in these, there is surely a contingency plan for anything RU may consider. 9/
The contingency plans are further and constantly refined by intelligence from multiple sources the US government receives...signal, satellites, human sources, movement of forces, etc.

The only wild card is...Putin's decision making. 10/
Bottom line: There are all sorts of contingencies of what *might* happen, and there are NO pundits anywhere who can predict - with certainty - what Putin will do.

But gathering intel, watching closely, and prudent planning mitigates & prepares the US/NATO for response. 11/

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Mark Hertling

Mark Hertling Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @MarkHertling

Oct 5
Interestingly, RU State TV now claiming it will take “two months” to get recently mobilized to the front lines in Ukraine.

Great. But will they be able to do anything? No friggin’ way.

RU may be able to train the basics of soldiering in 2 months.

But…. 1/5
-You can’t “train” combined arms warfare, especially for large formations, in 2 months
-You can’t “teach” Generals, Colonels and new Sergeants the tenets of leadership in 2 months
-You can’t “fix” a supply system that has been plagued with corruption for years in 2 months. 2/
-You can’t “coordinate” tankers, infantry, arty, intel, engineers, air forces & others for battlefield operations in 2 months
-you can’t “counter distrust” soldiers have in RU govt in 2 months
-after 60,000 dead soldiers, you can’t reverse the loss felt by RU mothers & wives 3/
Read 5 tweets
Sep 27
Fascinating story. Russians "trapped" into serving in the military. A recommended read.

A discussion I heard compared the current Russian protest to what the US experienced during Vietnam.

And that's like comparing apples to tennis rackets! 1/6

nytimes.com/2022/09/27/opi…
US society (& young men) protested the Vietnam war because they believed it was immoral and most believed it was not in the national interest.

There is more to why RU men are refusing service:

1. Most haven't been trained (they served in RU army because they had to...2/
...the choice was service or jail
2. They have no trust in RU's way of war.
3. These are not "reservist" as the US knows them. US reserves train with their units, have skills. RU have not, do not.
3. These men have seen RU's soldiers killed in droves in Ukraine. 3/
Read 6 tweets
Sep 22
"Everything is very simple in war, but even the simplest thing is difficult. These difficulties accumulate and produce a friction, which no man can imagine exactly who has not seen war." Clausewitz, chapter 1, book 7.

Because it's Friday, here's a short 🧵 1/
I'm a big fan of Clausewitz, was introduced to him when attending the US Army's School of Advanced Military Studies @us_sams as a young major in 1988.

An extremely formative 1-year course.

4 small groups of majors intensely studying theory, doctrine, history, battles & war. 2/
We debated & discussed Clausewitz, Sun Tzu, Jomini, Mahan, Douhet, du Picq, and others ad nauseam. We called it the "book a day club."

But "Old Dead Carl" (as we called Clausewitz) came alive for me. as it was interesting applying his Napoleonic thoughts to today's problems. 3/
Read 10 tweets
Sep 21
Putin's announced mobilization of 300,000 "reservists" was jaw-dropping to me this morning, but not for the reason some might suspect.

Why? Because know how Russian soldiers are trained, in basic training & in their units.

A brief 🧵 on some fun facts. 1/
While I commanded US Army Europe before retiring, before that I commanded all basic & advanced soldier training for the Army (2009-11).

During that period,≈150,000 new soldiers/year at (then) 5 basic training sites & 21 advanced training locations, received training.2/ Image
Most new US soldiers get 10 weeks of basic training (some get more at one-station unit training (OSUT) sites, like infantry, artillery, MPs). Those that don't go to OSUT travel off to different length courses for advanced training in a "specialty" (logistics, intel, etc). 3/ Image
Read 12 tweets
Sep 20
Let me get this straight:
1. Russia thought their "special operation" would last 3 days.
2. After 2 months of fighting with Spetsnaz, Airborne & 190+ BTGs, they achieved NONE of their Strategic, Operational or Tactical Objectives.
3. Based on #2, they decided to shift... 1/8
...their main effort to the Donbas, where they expended 70+% of their precision munitions hitting civilian targets, while failing to gain any significant military objectives.
4. Then, Putin announced RUF would secure Luhans'k & Donetsk by 15 September.
5. RU "mobilized"...2/
... the LPR & DPR militias, "recruited" prisoners, "drafted" locals, asked for soldiers from other countries & brought in the Wagner Group to execute #4.
6. But, after announcing & then delaying the Kherson referendum & under threat of a UKR offensive in Kherson...3/
Read 8 tweets
Sep 16
Warning: This will NOT be a popular thread. I anticipate a high degree of pushback from those who follow me.

But...I thought it might be useful to provide some thoughts as to why the US may be "rebuffing" the request to provide ATACMS to Ukraine.
1/15
cnn.com/2022/09/15/pol…
This topic will be a topic as @POTUS announces the next Presidential Drawdown Authority (PDA) for Ukraine military aid, which may occur in 2-3 days, with a new tranche figure somewhere between $500-750M.

The package will likely consist of mostly HIMAR pods & artillery 2/
Many will ask: "Why no longer range ATACMS?"

Most of those asking may not know the difference - besides the extended range - of ATACM missiles versus HIMAR rockets. So here's some details comparisons: 3/
Read 15 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(