BREAKING: The American Medical Association is asking Big Tech and the Department of Justice to censor, deplatform, investigate, and prosecute journalists who question the orthodoxy of radical gender surgeries for minors, arguing that public criticism is "disinformation."
This is now the Left's playbook: last year, the National School Board Association, Department of Justice, and F.B.I. worked together to label parents who opposed critical race theory "domestic terrorists." They want to stifle dissent, suppress speech, and criminalize opposition.
We need to our local fascism expert @jasonintrator to let us know if a collaboration between the state security services and the largest corporations to silence political opposition is "fascism"—or if that's moot because the current president isn't orange-colored.
The morality of this situation is blindingly clear:
• Threatening hospitals is wrong.
• Censoring journalists is wrong.
• Criminalizing political opposition is wrong.
• Surgically removing a child's genitalia is wrong.
If "gender-affirming care" is so good, the activists and doctors who promote it—and profit from it—should defend their practices in the realm public opinion. In a democracy, everyone gets to weigh in on important issues, not just regime-approved apparatchiks.
Children's hospitals: "We give children puberty blockers, hormones, and gender surgeries."
Conservatives: "They give children puberty blockers, hormones, and gender surgeries."
The regime: "That's harmful disinformation and should be censored, criminalized, and suppressed."
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The Left has made a strategic mistake in calling for the DOJ to prosecute journalists who oppose radical gender surgeries for minors. Conservatives should frame this as government suppression and focus the debate on the facts and images, which are horrific—and make a 70/30 issue.
I want to see every conservative news program play the videos, show the photos, reference the studies, and quote the queer theorists. Show the public exactly what they're doing and raise the stakes with the line that "the Left wants the DOJ to prosecute us for questioning this."
Remember: according to the NYT, 70% of the public opposes teaching gender theory in elementary school—including approximately two-thirds of women and Latinos. These same demos will be *shocked* when they see radical gender theory's medical conclusions.
SCOOP: San Francisco Unified School District has released a guidebook encouraging teachers to facilitate secret child sexual transitions and to affirm students who use the gender pronoun "it" at school—which, the district says, is the gender-identity version of the "n-word."
🧵
According to documents I've obtained from a whistleblower, the district has implemented a radical gender theory curriculum and celebrated "International Pronouns Day," teaching students that they can adopt a wide range of genders and sexual identities.
The district teaches students that they can diverge from from "vanilla sexuality" and become part of the "bisexual umbrella," with sexual identity options including "fluid," "pansexual," "omnisexual," "homo-curious," and "hetero-flexible."
EXCLUSIVE: The national teachers union’s "LGBTQ+ Caucus" has created a website and badge for public school employees that promotes a how-to guide for "anal sex," "bondage," "rimming," "domination," "sadomasochism," "muffing," and "fisting."
Let's review the documents. 🧵
According to local news reporting, the National Education Association and its local affiliate in Hilliard, Ohio, have been providing staff in the Hilliard City School District with the QR code-enabled badges, which point to the "NEA LGBTQ+ Caucus" website. archive.ph/PyBzW
One of the resources is Teen Health Source’s guide to "Queering Sexual Education," which promises to "empower youth" and features a manual on "Sex Acts That Don't Get Enough Play. archive.ph/mq17X
NEW: The Michigan Department of Education instructed public school teachers how to facilitate child sexual transitions and recommended that teachers keep a child's "chosen name and pronouns" a secret from parents, even if the child is suicidal.
It's all on video. 🧵
The training program follows the basic narrative of radical gender theory: the presenters claim the West has created a false notion that “gender is binary” in order to oppress racial and sexual minorities. In response, teachers should work to “dismantle systems of oppression.”
Trainer Amorie Robinson, who says she is a “Black, masculine-identified, cisgendered lesbian” and uses the “African name” Kofi Adoma, says that gender is an infinite spectrum, including identities such as “genderfluid,” “genderqueer,” “butch,” “stud,” and “questioning.”
UPDATE: I spoke with Boston Police Department about the bomb threat at Boston Children's Hospital. A spokesman told me "the threat itself did not get reported to police. It came secondhand." But he refused to say who alerted BPD, telling me it was part of the investigation file.
I have submitted a public records request asking for a transcript of the communication alerting Boston Police Department about the bomb threat. The Washington Post jumped to conclusions without substantiating the facts. The public has a right to know what happened.
It's entirely possible that the official narrative is correct. But we need answers to a few questions: Who alerted BPD about the bomb threat? How did they communicate this info? And where is the evidence to substantiate claims of threats and harassment against Boston Children's?
Uju Anya is a critical race theorist at Carnegie Mellon University.
She believes that "white women consistently vote to protect white supremacy" and that white mothers of biracial children have "Mandingo bbc fantasies of Black men" and regularly call their own children the n-word.
And yes, this woman helps design school curricula and DEI programs.