Thomas C. Theiner Profile picture
Oct 4, 2022 โ€ข 17 tweets โ€ข 6 min read โ€ข Read on X
As things are moving fast on the Kherson front I drew up a few maps to explain the situation.

A short thread๐Ÿงต:

In Kherson the russians hold a sizeable bridgehead on the right bank of the Dnipro river (shaded red), which could only be supplied by two bridges, one
1/n Image
just a bit North of Kherson and the other over the dam at Nova Kakhovka (purple pentagons).
Since the arrival of M142 HIMARS both crossing have been pounded heavily by Ukrainian forces.
Since August the Antonovsky bridge near Kherson is impassable for vehicles (photo), while
2/n Image
the dam at Nova Kakhovka is still passable for trucks, but not heavy vehicles (photo).

Over the last month Ukraine has been wearing the russian forces in Kherson down: through artillery fire, constant probing attacks, drone attacks, and by destroying their ammo and supplies.
3/n Image
russia brought in pontoons to supply its forces in the South near Kherson (photo), but thanks to HIMARS Ukraine has been hitting and sinking these pontoons.

Now Ukraine went on the offensive in the North and quickly overran the starving, demoralized russian forces there.
4/n Image
This is the same map as in tweet 1, but seeing this map makes it easier to understand Ukraine's initial attacks (blue arrows):
One attack pierced the russian line near the Dnipro, using the 5 km wide river to cover its eastern flank. At the same time Ukrainian troops attacked
5/n Image
from their Inhulets bridgehead - thus fixing the russians forces there in place.
Meeting little resistance Ukrainian forces pushed South to Dudchany. This meant that the russian troops still holding the front in the North are now at risk of being encircled. The latest news
6/n
indicate that these russians are already fleeing from there (red arrows).
Kherson is steppe = a flat landscape with some thin treelines as only cover. There are no natural barriers, which makes it impossible for the russians to set up an improvised defensive line.
7/n Image
The russians can't stop retreating until the next natural barrier: either the Dnipro river or the Inhulets river

Retreating over the Dnipro Nova Kakhovka would make more sense for the russians, as

(Photo of the landscape in northern Kherson - ideal armored warfare country)
8/n Image
here their trucks and light vehicles can still cross and once on the left bank the russians could set up a defensive line to secure the rear of their forces fighting in Zaporizhzhia.

The other option is to retreat South to the Inhulets river (blue line).
9/n Image
Retreating to the Inhulets would be what a complete moron does... so the russians will do it.

Let's look again at the map with the second phase of the operation in Kherson: the russians retreat either over the Nova Kakhovka dam or over the Inhulets river:
10/n Image
if they retreat over the dam they will have to leave all their heavy vehicles behind, if they retreat over the Inhulets they will have to abandon most of their vehicles for lack of fuel.
And if the russians retreat over the Inhulets, the Ukrainians can cross the Dnipro and
11/n
establish a bridgehead on the left bank, from which they can attack towards Crimea and Melitopol. At Kakhovka they can also cut the water to Crimea.

In short the russians only have bad options (putin the "strategic genius" at it again).

Some russians will flee over the
12/n
Nova Kakhovka dam, but most will retreat over the Inhulets... and as said that's the most moronic option, because then the russians there will be boxed in by Ukrainian troops from three sides, with M777 howitzers able to hit almost every spot, and
13/n Image
AHS Krab, PzH 2000, Zuzana 2 and CAESAR able to hit every spot. And the only supply line will be pontoons, whose landing spots on both sides of the Dnipro are in Ukrainian artillery range.
Retreating over the Inhulets is retreating into a death trap. Once Ukrainian M777 can
14/n
hit the pontoons no ammo, no fuel, no food - nothing will reach the 15,000 russians stuck there. It's starve to death or freeze to death or surrender for them.

And they can't flee across the Antonovsky bridge as Ukrainian spotters will see them & artillery will shred them.
15/n
And in fall/winter they can't swim across the 1 km wide Dnipro river with its freezing water, as that would mean death by hypothermia.

putin just annexed Kherson, so he refuses to give it up... which means he has doomed all the russian troops there to death.
16/n
This is a textbook example how a smart, capable, flexible, motivated army can use terrain, enemy incompetence, and operational art to beat a cretinously led army.

We're gonna see more of this, because putin is a moron and General Zaluzhnyi is a genius.

17/end Image

โ€ข โ€ข โ€ข

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
ใ€€

Keep Current with Thomas C. Theiner

Thomas C. Theiner Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @noclador

Feb 1
This is Ireland.

A beautiful, green island, inhabited by the North Irish and to their South the worst defence scroungers of the continent.

With just 0.25% of GDP for defence the Republic of Ireland is the lowest defence spender in all of Europe.

Even the Vatican spends
1/41 Image
GDP-wise ten times more on the Swiss Guard.

Ireland is shamelessly scrounging off the UK for its defence.

Even more infuriating: the Irish had a budget surplus of โ‚ฌ25 billion in 2024. That's +8% of GDP. And yet they expect the UK to deploy its limited military resources
2/41 Image
to defend Ireland's air and sea for free.

Ireland is the worst of the worst of the worst.

With a GDP of over โ‚ฌ500 billion and a budget surplus of โ‚ฌ41.1 billion in three years (2022 โ‚ฌ8.6 billion; 2023 โ‚ฌ7.5 billion; 2024 โ‚ฌ25 billion as Apple now finally pays taxes),
3/41
Read 41 tweets
Jan 29
As many people do not realize the importance of ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ฑ Greenland for the defence of the ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ US, I will explain it:

โ€ข ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ chinese nuclear submarines

If you watched The Hunt for Red October, you already know the reason the US has been, is, will be worried about enemy submarines.
1/24 Image
Enemy submarines operating off the US East Coast would sink US ships, blockade US ports, launch cruise missiles at US cities, and disrupt US supply and reinforcement transports to Europe.

Today russia's Northern Fleet has 5ร— cruise missile and 9ร— attack submarines at
2/24 Image
Murmansk, which in case of war would sail towards the central Atlantic.

But to get there the russian submarines must pass the GIUK gap or Greenland-Iceland-UK gap.

During the Cold War the US Navy and US Air Force operated P-3C Orion Maritime Patrol Aircraft (MPA) and
3/24 Image
Read 24 tweets
Jan 29
Top 3 countries in Europe:

Ordering new main battle tanks:
๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ฑ Poland: 180ร— K2, 250ร— M1A2 SEPv3
๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡น Italy: 240ร— KF51 Panther
๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ช Germany: 123ร— Leopard 2A8, 17ร— Leopard 2A7 A1
1/5
Ordering new infantry fighting vehicles:
๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ฑ Poland: 1,000+ Borsuk
๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡น Italy: 679ร— KF41 Lynx
๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฟ Czechia: 172ร— CV90 Mk IV
2/5
Ordering new fighter jets:
๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ช Germany: 38ร— Eurofighter, 35ร— F-35 Lightning II
๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ฎ Finland: 64ร— F-35 Lightning II
๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡น Italy: 24ร— Eurofighter, 25ร— F-35 Lightning II

(Sweden's order of 60ร— Gripen E happened more than 10 years ago)
3/5
Read 5 tweets
Jan 29
After the end of the Cold War ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ช Sweden demilitarized #Gotland island, the key strategic location in the Baltic Sea.

After russia invaded Ukraine in 2014, Sweden remilitarized the island. The new Gotland Regiment (P 18), an armored formation, is a signal to enemy and allies,
1/9 Image
that Sweden WILL DEFEND Gotland.

Sweden also formed a second amphibious battalion, ordered Blekinge-class submarines, bought Patriot air defence systems, grows its air force with Gripen E fighters, ordered modernized RBS 15 Mk. IV anti-ship missiles, etc. etc.
2/9 Image
In short: Sweden is investing in its defence, with equipment orders and upgrades, as well as unit formations and relocations that signal the country's intent to defend all of its territory.

Are the Swedish forces strong enough to defeat a russian invasion 4-5 years after the
3/9 Image
Read 9 tweets
Jan 27
๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ฐ Denmark

They last added a frigate to their Navy in 2011. They plan to add the next by around 2032 (!).

This is an unserious clown-show!

Alas, they are just as unserious as ๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ด๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ช. Governments in Europe refuse to accept that we are in an emergency far
1/14
worse than any in the last 80 years.

โ€ข russia is invading Ukraine, which will fall if we do not triple our military aid.
โ€ข China will invade Taiwan, which will cut off all trade with Japan and South Korea
โ€ข Trump is gonna break all bonds with Europe, and invade Panama
2/14
This means Europe can no longer rely on the highly trained and exquisitely equipped 100,000 US troops based in Europe to defend us.

Furthermore since russia invaded Ukraine the US Army has continuously two armored brigades and one light brigade on rotation in Europe, which
3/14
Read 15 tweets
Jan 25
Combat brigade reductions of #NATO nations 1989 vs. 2025:

๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ -52ร—
๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ช -40ร—
๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ท -27ร—
๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ช -25ร—
๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง -24ร—
๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡น -17ร—
๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ด -13ร—
๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ธ -11ร—
๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฑ -9ร—
๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ฐ -5ร—
๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ช -5ร—
๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ -1ร—

A detailed break down follows, and also details about the former Warsaw Pact members: ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฟ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ญ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡ด
1/28
๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ USA 1989: 110ร— brigades
โ€ข Army: 55ร— (34ร— Armor/Mech., 14ร— Infantry, 4ร— Airborne, 3ร— Air Assault)
โ€ข National Guard: 52ร— (30ร— Armor/Mech., 22ร— Infantry)
โ€ข Reserve: 3ร— (1ร— Mech., 2ร— Infantry)

Of the Army brigades 17ร— were based in Europe, 3ร— in South Korea, 1ร— in Panama.
2/28
๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ USA 2025: 58ร— brigades (-52ร— vs. 1989)
โ€ข Army: 31ร— (11ร— Armor/Mech., 6ร— Stryker, 6ร— Infantry, 5ร— Airborne, 3ร— Air Assault)
โ€ข National Guard: 27ร— (5ร— Armor/Mech., 2ร— Stryker, 20ร— Infantry)

The reduction of US Armor/Mech. brigades is staggering: from 65ร— to just 16ร—.
3/28
Read 30 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(