🌳👾 Sending these rhododendrons out of the ancient woodland and straight back to hell. #BiodiversityCrisis
It’s hard to show the size of that rhododendron. I’d say this monster was two single decker buses. This photo is after legend volunteers bashed about half of it. Image
People defend rhododendrons because they’re pretty, but look at the difference of the surrounding woodland and the area we are cutting. Biodiversity inside their perimeter is absolutely nothing. Not a sausage. Just rhododendron.
Thankfully the volunteers today went on a mission. We removed two huge piles of bamboo and dug them out. Got two small cherry Laurel and probably 10-15 smaller rhododendrons before this beast.

You plant it in your garden, your nearby countryside gets it all too. ImageImageImage
With these fast spreading monocultures removed, other species will have a chance to thrive. Species that our native birds and wildlife know how to interact with, use as habitat, or as food.

Rewilding cannot happen if these invasive species are present, they’re mutually exclusive
Generally I don’t want to be breathing this shit in either tbh. I’m pretty annoyed I have to as it’s carcinogenic.

Needs to be got rid off so it doesn’t reroot. The alternatives are spraying/drilling chemicals like glyphosate around the woods and that’s horrendous too. Image
If you’ve got Cherry Laurel, Rhododendrons, Bamboo, or any other invasive plants, either dig it out, get a professional to dig it out, or maybe @ProtectEarthUK can help you. Regardless, everyone please go and demand your local garden centre stop selling this crap.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Tree Sturgeon 🚴🔥🌍

Tree Sturgeon 🚴🔥🌍 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @philsturgeon

Oct 3, 2021
This old thread is doing the rounds again so I’ll give a few thoughts as somebody who plants trees in the U.K, because y’all keep asking me to. A lot of good points are raised, but I’m not sure who the target audience is. Maybe politicians? Anyway.
First off “it’s not just about trees” tbh most tree planting organisations are well aware of this. Even @GrowingTheTrees is planting shrubs, hedgerows, and wildflower meadows. We need to leave clearings and create woodland edges too. Different species thrive in these habitats.
I think there’s a big difference between “tree plantations” and a woodland designed by an ecologist and a forester with the intent purpose of creating a biodiverse forest. Just saying the phrase plantation incorrectly conjures images of rows, monoculture, timber harvesting, etc.
Read 13 tweets
Apr 12, 2021
🌍 If we want to get to carbon neutrality we have to emit some carbon to do it. Construction creates emissions. Solar panels, wind turbines, electric trains, all of these things have a cost/benefit analysis and lifecycle analysis needs to be considered. 🧵
The argument “we cannot build wind/solar because of the construction emissions” is clearly utter nonsense, but it’s popular nonsense. It was the main premise of the “documentary” Planet of the Humans, and its right from the fossil fuel industry handbook. ecologi.com/articles/clima…
Here’s a chart comparing the CO2 emissions per kilowatt-hour that we get from each power source, compared to how much greenhouse gas was created to make it. See if you can notice a difference between renewables and fossil fuels. Way less. But still emissions. So... good or bad?
Read 14 tweets
Apr 11, 2021
🌍 Hell yes! Banning domestic flights that are already served by high-speed rail is exactly how you decarbonise transport. Cannot wait to do this in the UK once we’ve overhauled our train network. Roll on 2033. reuters.com/article/us-cli…
Woah France also nailing it with taking literal trucks off the road. This “rail motorway” will cut some truck journeys from 36 hours by road to 20 hours by train, saving time, money, and emissions. If only the U.K. was working on a way to increase rail freight!
Thankfully train ticket prices in France are pretty reasonable. They’re usually outright cheaper than flights, but sometimes they’re a little more on certain days/times/short-notice. You don’t book summer holiday flights day of either right? via @rome2rio
Read 6 tweets
Apr 10, 2021
🌍 The way we talk about infrastructure projects in the U.K. is utterly broken. HS2 receives nationwide coordinated attacks on the project as a whole, but the drastically more destructive road construction (#RIS2) is left to be fought separately by small local efforts.
I suspect much of this is because “cars are normal”, and partly that the cost benefit analysis of HS2 has been warped so badly by disinformation. that people think there’s barely any benefits, and the environmental costs have been presented with no context.
There’s the other concern that I hear a lot. The dreaded HS2 Ltd.

Can we for a moment separate the two ideas of:

1. HS2 (high speed rail releasing capacity on the existing network to reduce road/air passengers and freight)

2. HS2 Ltd the company managing the project
Read 12 tweets
Apr 6, 2021
🌍 There are so many scammers in the carbon offset space. Protecting woodlands that were never threatened is an incredibly common scam, along with getting paid for planting timber plantations being planted anyway, then they just cut them later. 🤬
Then there’s this shite. Nigel Farage has nobody’s best interests at heart ever. Maybe he feels bad that Brexit trashed the UK’s reforestation efforts, but more likely he’s cashing in on the tsunami of corporate greenwashing. thisismoney.co.uk/money/markets/…
I know for-profit companies in reforestation, rewilding, and carbon sequestration. Being for profit isn’t the problem, they’re actually saving the planet a little bit and making money, which helps them scale (and get more investment), not just lying to generate carbon credits.
Read 9 tweets
Mar 24, 2021
🌍 Now people in my mentions are saying that because slow trains haven’t stopped people flying domestically there’s no reason to build faster trains along the routes people commonly fly because they’re quicker than trains. 🙃 #whyHS2
The fun part about this graphic is that it says domestic trains are 41g. Yeah that’s a fair average when so many are diesel (and can’t be electrified due to limitations of the surrounding environment) but HS2 advertises 8g/km. closer to Eurostar levels of emissions.
These same people are acting like trains are inherently making people drive more, because some people drive to a train.
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(